Literature DB >> 27303904

Crystal structures of two monomeric triosephosphate isomerase variants identified via a directed-evolution protocol selecting for L-arabinose isomerase activity.

Mirja Krause1, Tiila Riikka Kiema2, Peter Neubauer1, Rik K Wierenga2.   

Abstract

The crystal structures are described of two variants of A-TIM: Ma18 (2.7 Å resolution) and Ma21 (1.55 Å resolution). A-TIM is a monomeric loop-deletion variant of triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) which has lost the TIM catalytic properties. Ma18 and Ma21 were identified after extensive directed-evolution selection experiments using an Escherichia coli L-arabinose isomerase knockout strain expressing a randomly mutated A-TIM gene. These variants facilitate better growth of the Escherichia coli selection strain in medium supplemented with 40 mM L-arabinose. Ma18 and Ma21 differ from A-TIM by four and one point mutations, respectively. Ma18 and Ma21 are more stable proteins than A-TIM, as judged from CD melting experiments. Like A-TIM, both proteins are monomeric in solution. In the Ma18 crystal structure loop 6 is open and in the Ma21 crystal structure loop 6 is closed, being stabilized by a bound glycolate molecule. The crystal structures show only small differences in the active site compared with A-TIM. In the case of Ma21 it is observed that the point mutation (Q65L) contributes to small structural rearrangements near Asn11 of loop 1, which correlate with different ligand-binding properties such as a loss of citrate binding in the active site. The Ma21 structure also shows that its Leu65 side chain is involved in van der Waals interactions with neighbouring hydrophobic side-chain moieties, correlating with its increased stability. The experimental data suggest that the increased stability and solubility properties of Ma21 and Ma18 compared with A-TIM cause better growth of the selection strain when coexpressing Ma21 and Ma18 instead of A-TIM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TIM barrel; enzyme engineering; non-natural enzymes; structure-based rational design; triosephosphate isomerase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27303904      PMCID: PMC4909251          DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X16007548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun        ISSN: 2053-230X            Impact factor:   1.056


  42 in total

1.  L-arabinose isomerase.

Authors:  J Patrick; N Lee
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  L-Arabinose binding, isomerization, and epimerization by D-xylose isomerase: X-ray/neutron crystallographic and molecular simulation study.

Authors:  Paul Langan; Amandeep K Sangha; Troy Wymore; Jerry M Parks; Zamin Koo Yang; B Leif Hanson; Zoe Fisher; Sax A Mason; Matthew P Blakeley; V Trevor Forsyth; Jenny P Glusker; Horace L Carrell; Jeremy C Smith; David A Keen; David E Graham; Andrey Kovalevsky
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Structures of Plasmodium falciparum triosephosphate isomerase complexed to substrate analogues: observation of the catalytic loop in the open conformation in the ligand-bound state.

Authors:  S Parthasarathy; Hemalatha Balaram; P Balaram; M R N Murthy
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-11-23

4.  Structural determinants for ligand binding and catalysis of triosephosphate isomerase.

Authors:  I Kursula; S Partanen; A M Lambeir; D M Antonov; K Augustyns; R K Wierenga
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2001-10

Review 5.  Triosephosphate isomerase: a highly evolved biocatalyst.

Authors:  R K Wierenga; E G Kapetaniou; R Venkatesan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Refined 1.83 A structure of trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase crystallized in the presence of 2.4 M-ammonium sulphate. A comparison with the structure of the trypanosomal triosephosphate isomerase-glycerol-3-phosphate complex.

Authors:  R K Wierenga; M E Noble; G Vriend; S Nauche; W G Hol
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Decision making in xia2.

Authors:  Graeme Winter; Carina M C Lobley; Stephen M Prince
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-06-18

8.  How good are my data and what is the resolution?

Authors:  Philip R Evans; Garib N Murshudov
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-06-13

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.