| Literature DB >> 27302925 |
Jiazhu Wu1,2,3, Xiaojing Xu4, Eun-Joon Lee3, Austin Y Shull3,5, Lirong Pei3, Farrukh Awan6, Xiaoling Wang4, Jeong-Hyeon Choi3, Libin Deng7, Hong-Bo Xin7, Wenxun Zhong8, Jinhua Liang1,2, Yi Miao1,2, Yujie Wu1,2, Lei Fan1,2, Jianyong Li1,2, Wei Xu1,2, Huidong Shi3,5.
Abstract
Immunosuppression is a prevalent clinical feature in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, with many patients demonstrating increased susceptibility to infections as well as increased failure of an antitumor immune response. However, much is currently not understood regarding the precise mechanisms that attribute to this immunosuppressive phenotype in CLL. To provide further clarity to this particular phenomenon, we analyzed the T-cell profile of CLL patient samples within a large cohort and observed that patients with an inverted CD4/CD8 ratio had a shorter time to first treatment as well as overall survival. These observations coincided with higher expression of the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 in CLL patient CD8+ T cells when compared to age-matched healthy donors. Interestingly, we discovered that increased PD-1 expression in CD8+ T cells corresponds with decreased DNA methylation levels in a distal upstream locus of the PD-1 gene PDCD1. Further analysis using luciferase reporter assays suggests that the identified PDCD1 distal upstream region acts as an enhancer for PDCD1 transcription and this region becomes demethylated during activation of naïve CD8+ T cells by anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies and IL2. Finally, we conducted a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis comparing CD8+ T cells from CLL patients against healthy donors and identified additional differentially methylated genes with known immune regulatory functions including CCR6 and KLRG1. Taken together, our findings reveal the occurrence of epigenetic reprogramming taking place within CLL patient CD8+ T cells and highlight the potential mechanism of how immunosuppression is accomplished in CLL.Entities:
Keywords: CD8+ T-cells; DNA methylation; PD-1; chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27302925 PMCID: PMC5130028 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The inverted CD4/CD8 ratio is associated with poor outcome in CLL patients
(A) and (B) Histograms illustrating the absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 234 Chinese CLL patients, respectively. (C) CD4/CD8 ratio was determined for the same group of CLL patients with the threshold between normal and inverted ratio being 1. (D and E) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of TTFT and OS according to CD4/CD8 ratio; inverted ratio group referring to those below the cut-off value of 1, and normal ratio group as those above the cut-off value of 1 (p = 0.031 and p = 0.039, respectively).
Clinical characteristics of patients grouped by the CD4/CD8 ratio (cut off 1.0)
| Patient characteristics | CD4:CD8 ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1 | > 1 | |||
| Age (years) | 61 (20–86) | |||
| Gender (%) | ||||
| Male | 159 (67.95%) | |||
| Female | 75 (32.05%) | |||
| Binet stage (%) | ||||
| A/B | 167 (71.37%) | 32 | 135 | 0.039 |
| C | 67 (28.63%) | 22 | 45 | |
| IGHV (%) | ||||
| Mutated | 122 (61.93%) | 32 | 90 | 0.298 |
| Unmutated | 75 (38.07%) | 14 | 61 | |
| CD38 (%) | ||||
| Positive (> 30%) | 48 (21.33%) | 16 | 32 | 0.054 |
| Negative (< 30%) | 177 (78.67%) | 35 | 142 | |
| ZAP70 (%) | ||||
| Positive (> 20%) | 88 (43.56%) | 16 | 72 | 0.098 |
| Negative (< 20%) | 114 (56.44%) | 33 | 81 | |
| With TP53 mutation or del (17 p) | 23 (13.69%) | 8 | 15 | 0.105 |
| Without TP53 mutation or del (17 p) | 145 (86.31%) | 28 | 117 | |
Figure 2The surface expression of PD-1 in CD8+ T-cell subsets from CLL patients and normal donors
PD-1 protein expression was measured by flow cytometry in primary CLL samples using an anti-PD-1 antibody.
Figure 3The distal upstream region of PDCD1 is hypomethylated in CD8+ T cells from CLL patients
(A) Illustration of the PDCD1 gene from UCSC genome browser. The ChIP-seq tracks of H3K27ac and H3K4me1 marks in human CD8+ memory T cells were downloaded from the NIH Epigenome Roadmap dataset. Three candidate regulatory regions were selected for pyrosequencing analysis. (B) Bisulfite pyrosequencing results of first intron (+ 0.5 kb), promoter (−1 kb), and distal upstream (−4.7 kb) regions in CD8+ T cells from CLL and ND samples. Each dot represents a sample; red dots denote CD8+ T cells from CLL (n = 15) and blue dots represent ND samples (n = 10). *p < 0.05. (C) Correlation between the relative expression of PDCD1 mRNA and the average methylation level of the first intron, promoter and distal upstream locus. Quantitative RT-PCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing analyses were performed on the matched CLL samples.
Figure 4CpG methylation regulates enhancer activity of a distal upstream sequence of PDCD1
(A) Luciferase reporter assays: a 677 bp PDCD1 distal upstream DNA fragment was cloned into luciferase reporter vector pGL4.23 with a minimal promoter. Additionally, a version of the reporter plasmid was methylated by the M.SssI enzyme in vitro. The methylated, unmethylated, and empty reporter plasmids were then transfected into Jurkat cells to determine enhancer-mediated transcription. Schematic diagrams of experiment designs were shown on the left. (Errors bars = S.E.M.; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). (B) Surface expression of PD-1 was upregulated in normal CD8+ T cells upon stimulation by PMA/ionomycin. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was measured by flow cytometry. (C and E) DNA methylation level of the PDCD1 distal upstream region was measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing in purified naïve, memory CD8+ T cells and activated naïve CD8+ T cells from two independent ND samples. The first 7 CpG sites are the same CpGs analyzed in the far right panel of Figure 3B. (D and F) qRT-PCR analysis of PDCD1 mRNA expression in purified naïve, memory CD8+ T cells and activated naïve CD8+ T cells from two ND samples. The relative expression of PDCD1 is calculated as fold changes using the ΔΔCt method. Naïve CD8+ T cells were activated by anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies in the presence of IL2 for 6 days and then harvested for methylation and gene expression analysis.
Figure 5Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies differentially methylated CpG sites in CD8+ T cells from CLL patient (n = 10) and ND (n = 5) samples
(A) Volcano plot illustrates the 312 differentially methylated CpGs (DMCs) between CD8+ T cells from CLL and ND samples with 199 hypermethylated and 113 hypomethylated CpG sites that are associated with 206 genes. (B) Pie charts show distribution of DMCs among different annotation categories. (C) Heatmap shows a supervised cluster analysis of the 312 DMCs between CD8+T cells from CLL and ND samples. (D) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed the enrichment of immune related pathways involved by 206 differentially methylated genes.(E) Representative DMCs associated with 8 genes related to immune function.
Figure 6Bisulfite pyrosequencing confirmed the decrease in methylation levels of CpG sites associated with TCRA, CCR6, and KLRG1 in CD8+ T cells from CLL patients as compared to healthy donors
(A, B, and C) A representative set of DMCs from the TCRA, CCR6, and KLRG1 genes identified by 450 K methylation-array analysis was validated by pyrosequencing. Red dots denote CD8+ T cells from CLL (n = 13–14) and blue dots represent ND samples (n = 10). (D) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed inverse correlation between KLRG1 mRNA and promoter methylation in CD8+ T cells from CLL patients.