| Literature DB >> 27302715 |
Sun Ok Song1, Yong Ho Lee2, Dong Wook Kim3, Young Duk Song4, Joo Young Nam1, Kyoung Hye Park1, Dae Jung Kim5, Seok Won Park6, Hyun Chul Lee2, Byung Wan Lee2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data is useful to estimate the necessary manpower and resources used for disease control and prevention of prevalent chronic diseases. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of diabetes and identify its trends based on the claims data from the National Health Insurance Service database over the last decade.Entities:
Keywords: Claims data; Diabetes; Incidence; Korea
Year: 2016 PMID: 27302715 PMCID: PMC4923414 DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.2.292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) ISSN: 2093-596X
Trends in the Number of Diabetes Claim Patients by Year
| Year | Men, | Women, | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 673,393 (48.89) | 703,926 (51.11) | 1,377,319 |
| 2004 | 744,819 (49.53) | 758,870 (50.47) | 1,503,689 |
| 2005 | 887,835 (49.59) | 902,613 (50.41) | 1,790,448 |
| 2006 | 949,990 (49.6) | 965,468 (50.4) | 1,915,458 |
| 2007 | 1,007,135 (49.94) | 1,009,588 (50.06) | 2,016,723 |
| 2008 | 1,057,393 (50.18) | 1,049,732 (49.82) | 2,107,125 |
| 2009 | 1,103,528 (50.38) | 1,087,072 (49.62) | 2,190,600 |
| 2010 | 1,168,993 (50.64) | 1,139,352 (49.36) | 2,308,345 |
| 2011 | 1,253,620 (50.96) | 1,206,332 (49.04) | 2,459,952 |
| 2012 | 1,320,715 (51.37) | 1,250,352 (48.63) | 2,571,067 |
Trends in the Number of Total Diabetes Claim Cases by Year
| Year | Men, | Women, | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 3,968,411 (47.52) | 4,383,263 (52.48) | 8,351,674 |
| 2004 | 4,510,704 (48.28) | 4,832,272 (51.72) | 9,342,976 |
| 2005 | 5,379,721 (49.14) | 5,567,347 (50.86) | 10,947,068 |
| 2006 | 6,105,981 (48.74) | 6,422,251 (51.26) | 12,528,232 |
| 2007 | 7,704,612 (47.90) | 8,381,517 (52.10) | 16,086,129 |
| 2008 | 9,006,979 (47.73) | 9,862,716 (52.27) | 18,869,695 |
| 2009 | 9,449,227 (48.07) | 10,207,780 (51.93) | 19,657,007 |
| 2010 | 9,875,313 (48.44) | 10,510,536 (51.56) | 20,385,849 |
| 2011 | 10,506,851 (49.03) | 10,923,602 (50.97) | 21,430,453 |
| 2012 | 11,355,282 (49.85) | 11,421,828 (50.15) | 22,777,110 |
| Total | 77,863,081 (48.55) | 82,513,112 (51.45) | 160,376,193 |
Incidence of New Diabetes Claim Patients by Year and Gender
| Year | Total population | Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Newly claimed patients, | Number | Newly claimed patients, | Age, yr, mean±SD | Number | Newly claimed patients, | Age, yr, mean±SD | |
| 2004 | 48,583,805 | 562,440 (1.16) | 24,363,083 | 280,629 (1.15) | 64±19 | 24,220,722 | 281,811 (1.16) | 68±21 |
| 2005 | 48,782,274 | 643,395 (1.32) | 24,456,234 | 313,527 (1.28) | 63±19 | 24,326,040 | 329,868 (1.36) | 68±20 |
| 2006 | 48,991,779 | 549,090 (1.12) | 24,557,004 | 266,983 (1.09) | 62±19 | 24,434,775 | 282,107 (1.16) | 68±21 |
| 2007 | 49,268,928 | 495,668 (1.01) | 24,691,249 | 243,714 (0.99) | 61±20 | 24,577,679 | 251,954 (1.03) | 66±21 |
| 2008 | 49,540,367 | 495,668 (1.00) | 24,822,897 | 227,069 (0.92) | 60±20 | 24,717,470 | 234,465 (0.95) | 66±21 |
| 2009 | 49,773,145 | 444,452 (0.89) | 24,929,939 | 219,945 (0.88) | 59±19 | 24,843,206 | 224,507 (0.90) | 64±21 |
| 2010 | 50,515,666 | 429,256 (0.85) | 25,310,385 | 214,112 (0.85) | 59±19 | 25,205,281 | 215,144 (0.85) | 63±21 |
| 2011 | 50,734,284 | 441,361 (0.87) | 25,406,934 | 222,630 (0.88) | 58±19 | 25,327,350 | 218,731 (0.86) | 62±20 |
| 2012 | 50,948,272 | 423,935 (0.83) | 25,504,060 | 215,791 (0.85) | 57±19 | 25,444,212 | 208,144 (0.82) | 61±20 |
| Total | 447,138,520 | 4,451,131 (1.00) | 224,041,785 | 2,204,400 (0.98) | - | 223,096,735 | 2,246,731 (1.01) | - |
Fig. 1Changes in the age of new claim patients from 2004 to 2012. Age distribution of new claim patients from 2004 to 2012.
Fig. 2Observed and predicted annual numbers of diabetes claim patients and cases. (A) Observed and predicted annual numbers of total diabetes claim patients. (B) Observed and predicted annual numbers of total diabetes claim cases. (C) Observed and predicted annual incidence of new diabetes claim patients. CI, confidence interval.