Karl E Minges1, Robin Whittemore1, Ariana M Chao2,3, Vanessa Jefferson1, Kathryn M Murphy4, Margaret Grey1. 1. School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, Connecticut, USA (Dr Minges, Dr Whittemore, Ms Jefferson, Dr Grey) 2. School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (Dr Chao) 3. Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (Dr Chao) 4. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (Dr Murphy).
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to examine the differences in clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors by sex and weight status. METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed from 318 adolescents (mean age = 12.3 ± 1.1 years, 55.0% female, 62.7% white) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from a multisite clinical trial. Differences were examined between normal weight (body mass index ≥5th and <85th percentile) and overweight/obese (body mass index ≥85th percentile) boys and girls with T1D in clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS:Overweight/obesity was prevalent (39.0%) and common in girls (42.6%) and boys (33.1%). In bivariate analyses, overweight/obese girls had parents with lower educational attainment, longer diabetes duration, and significantly worse self-management and psychosocial health as compared with normal weight girls. There were no differences between overweight/obese and normal weight girls in A1C, therapy type, race/ethnicity, or household income. No significant differences were found between normal weight and overweight/obese boys. In multivariate analysis, parental educational attainment (master or higher vs high school diploma or less) and perceived stress were significantly associated with overweight/obesity in girls. Longer duration of T1D bordered statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS:Overweight/obesity is prevalent among adolescents with T1D. Clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors are associated with overweight/obesity in girls but not boys. Greater attention to weight status and aspects of health that are germane to adolescents with T1D is warranted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to examine the differences in clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors by sex and weight status. METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed from 318 adolescents (mean age = 12.3 ± 1.1 years, 55.0% female, 62.7% white) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from a multisite clinical trial. Differences were examined between normal weight (body mass index ≥5th and <85th percentile) and overweight/obese (body mass index ≥85th percentile) boys and girls with T1D in clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Overweight/obesity was prevalent (39.0%) and common in girls (42.6%) and boys (33.1%). In bivariate analyses, overweight/obesegirls had parents with lower educational attainment, longer diabetes duration, and significantly worse self-management and psychosocial health as compared with normal weight girls. There were no differences between overweight/obese and normal weight girls in A1C, therapy type, race/ethnicity, or household income. No significant differences were found between normal weight and overweight/obeseboys. In multivariate analysis, parental educational attainment (master or higher vs high school diploma or less) and perceived stress were significantly associated with overweight/obesity in girls. Longer duration of T1D bordered statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight/obesity is prevalent among adolescents with T1D. Clinical, psychosocial, and demographic factors are associated with overweight/obesity in girls but not boys. Greater attention to weight status and aspects of health that are germane to adolescents with T1D is warranted.
Authors: Karl E Minges; Robin Whittemore; Stuart A Weinzimer; Melinda L Irwin; Nancy S Redeker; Margaret Grey Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2017-02-04 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Kimberly A Driscoll; Karen D Corbin; David M Maahs; Richard Pratley; Franziska K Bishop; Anna Kahkoska; Korey K Hood; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Anna R Kahkoska; Madison E Watts; Kimberly A Driscoll; Franziska K Bishop; Paul Mihas; Joan Thomas; Jennifer R Law; Nina Jain; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis Journal: Obes Med Date: 2018-02-22
Authors: Anna R Kahkoska; Christina M Shay; Sarah C Couch; Jamie Crandell; Dana Dabelea; Evgenia Gourgari; Jean M Lawrence; Angela D Liese; Catherine Pihoker; Beth A Reboussin; Natalie The; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.409
Authors: Regina L T Lee; Wai Tong Chien; Jason Ligot; Jennifer M Nailes; Keiko Tanida; Sachi Takeuchi; Masanori Ikeda; Sachiyo Miyagawa; Toshisaburo Nagai; Rutja Phuphaibul; Chatsiri Mekviwattanawong; Ing-Ya Su; Rui Xing Zhang; Paul H Lee; Stephen W H Kwok Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 3.390