| Literature DB >> 27302108 |
Luigi Scietti1, Katia Sampieri1, Irene Pinzuti1, Erika Bartolini1, Barbara Benucci1, Alessia Liguori1, Andreas F Haag1, Paola Lo Surdo1, Werner Pansegrau1, Vincenzo Nardi-Dei1, Laura Santini1, Seguinde Arora2, Xavier Leber2, Simonetta Rindi3, Silvana Savino1, Paolo Costantino1, Domenico Maione1, Marcello Merola1,4, Pietro Speziale3, Matthew J Bottomley1, Fabio Bagnoli1, Vega Masignani1, Mariagrazia Pizza1, Meike Scharenberg2, Jean-Marc Schlaeppi2, Mikkel Nissum1, Sabrina Liberatori1.
Abstract
During bacterial pathogenesis extensive contacts between the human and the bacterial extracellular proteomes take place. The identification of novel host-pathogen interactions by standard methods using a case-by-case approach is laborious and time consuming. To overcome this limitation, we took advantage of large libraries of human and bacterial recombinant proteins. We applied a large-scale protein microarray-based screening on two important human pathogens using two different approaches: (I) 75 human extracellular proteins were tested on 159 spotted Staphylococcus aureus recombinant proteins and (II) Neisseria meningitidis adhesin (NadA), an important vaccine component against serogroup B meningococcus, was screened against ≈2300 spotted human recombinant proteins. The approach presented here allowed the identification of the interaction between the S. aureus immune evasion protein FLIPr (formyl-peptide receptor like-1 inhibitory protein) and the human complement component C1q, key players of the offense-defense fighting; and of the interaction between meningococcal NadA and human LOX-1 (low-density oxidized lipoprotein receptor), an endothelial receptor. The novel interactions between bacterial and human extracellular proteins here presented might provide a better understanding of the molecular events underlying S. aureus and N. meningitidis pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27302108 PMCID: PMC4908583 DOI: 10.1038/srep27996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Conceptual organization of the workflow.
We divided the work in three main steps: the protein identification and production, the protein microarray preparation and screening, and the hits validation. The two different approaches applied to S. aureus and to N. meningitidis are shown.
Figure 2Protein microarray applied to S. aureus: design and results.
(a) Classification of the 75 human proteins tested in the microarray screening based on their biological function and (b) of the S. aureus proteins spotted on the chip based on their predicted localization. (c) Schematic overview of the grid resulting from the screening. S. aureus proteins (lines) spotted on the chip were plotted against human proteins (columns) tested in overlay. Cells contain MFI value for each pair. Color code is used for visual information and to identify the three MFI cut-off thresholds (grey: MFI < 5%; yellow: 5% < MFI < 25%; orange: 25% < MFI < 50%; red: 50% < MFI < 100%. Human complement factor H and ficolin-2 and the bacterial fHbp v 1, 2 and 3 (neisserial proteins used as control), SpA, FLIPr and Csa1D are highlighted. (d) Plotting of MFIs of the 75 human proteins on the spotted LytM. Inset table shows MFI values, protein name and gene symbol of the 4 human proteins displaying fluorescence intensities above 50% MFI. (e) Plotting of MFIs of the 75 human proteins on the spotted FLIPr. Inset table shows MFI values, protein name and gene symbol of the first 20 human proteins. C1qB subcomponent is highlighted in green.
Figure 3Biophysical and functional characterization of the FLIPr-C1q interaction.
Bio-layer interferometry (BLI) blank subtracted sensograms of (a) C1qA (200-3.1 nM), (b) C1qB (200-3.1 nM) and (c) C1qC (200-12.5 nM) subcomponents tested on covalently immobilized FLIPr. (d) BLI blank subtracted sensograms of FLIPr (5-0.15 μM) on immobilized C1q complex and (e) of C1q complex (3-0.09 nM) on immobilized FLIPr. The amount of ligand associating with the analyte was measured in nanometres (nm). Association and dissociation curves were fitted in a 1:1 model. (f) Summary table of the measured affinity constants (KD). (g) Complement classical pathway influence by FLIPr in WiELISA assay. Relative % of complement activation is shown for each sample. Results are mean of three replicates. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. (h) FLIPr-mediated dose dependent increase of S. aureus survival in whole blood assay. Relative survival was monitored through CFU count. (i) Survival in human blood of S. aureus USA 300 LAC wt, flipR deletion mutant (ΔflipR) and flipR deletion mutant complemented with empty (ΔflipR + pOS1) and with plasmid bearing the flipR insert (ΔflipR + pOS1-flipR). Results are mean of three replicates. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.
Figure 4Screening for NadA interactors.
(a) Plotting of MFIs relative percentage of spotted human proteins tested against NadA at 150 nM and (b) 1 μM. Red bars represent human proteins above the 25% cut-off threshold defining relevant interactions. Blue bars represent human proteins above the 4% cut-off threshold. Inset table shows gene symbol, protein name and MFI values of the relevant interactions.
Figure 5Biophysical characterization of the NadA/LOX-1 interaction.
(a) Blank subtracted sensograms of NadA (500 - 7.8 nM) tested on covalently immobilized LOX-1 and (b) of LOX-1 (250 - 7.8 nM) tested on biotinylated NadA immobilized on SA biosensors. Association and dissociation curves were fitted in a 1:1 model. (c) Schematic representation of the NadA constructs used to determine NadA binding site on LOX-1. NadA gene, NadA (green), NadA24–170 (blue) and NadA91–342 (yellow) structure are shown. NadA24–89 head construct is represented only as a cartoon (rectangles) since it is not trimeric and not folded. Signal peptide (light blue) and membrane anchor (orange) are shown in the cartoon. (d) Blank subtracted sensograms of LOX-1 (200 nM) on biotinylated NadA (blue), NadA24–170 (green), NadA91–342 (yellow) and NadA24–89 (red). (e) Binding competition between LOX-1 and anti-NadA mAbs. Binding between NadA and LOX-1 is shown (blue). mAb 9F11 mapping NadA stalk does not inhibit the binding with NadA (red). mAb 3C11/H7 (violet) and mAb 1C9/A9 (green) mapping on NadA head abrogated NadA binding on LOX-1.
Figure 6NadA binds CHO cells expressing hLOX-1.
FACS plots representative of LOX-1 (YFP) expression in CHO cells and cells able to bind NadA (APC). The gating strategy was designed to separate the cells of interest from large aggregates and debris [initial gate on forward scatter (FSC) versus side scatter (SSC) plot], deplete dead cells (Live/Dead Aqua staining) and doublets/aggregates (standard gates on both FSC-width and SSC-width) (data not shown). Simple gating by quadrants allowed defining the absolute percentages of cells positive for LOX-1 only (32%, bottom left) and double positive cells (30%, bottom right) representing the cells able to bind recombinant NadA. The upper right panel shows that not-transfected cells are not able to bind NadA. The upper left panel shows the non-transfected cells.
Primers used in this study.
| Primer name | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| NWMN_1067_−998_KpnI_F2 | AAGCTGGGTACCCCATTGAATTAAATGCTCTAAAACGAC |
| NWMN_1067_+6_R | GTATGTTTTTTAATATTTCATAATAAGTTCTCCCTGTAAAATAAATTTG |
| NWMN_1067_+397_F | CTTATTATGAAATATTAAAAAACATACTGAATTAAATAGTTGTACGC |
| NWMN_1067_ +1425_SacI_R2 | GAATTGGAGCTCGATAACCCTATATGGTTGAATCATGTTG |
| NWMN_1067_−313_EcoRI_F | ATCCGGGAATTCGGAGTGTTTGTCTATCCAACTTAGCAAAC |
| NWMN_1067_+467_PstI_R | GCTTGGCTGCAGGCACGCCAATACGTTAGCATTG |
| NWMN_1067_−1144_F | GTGACCCAGCTAATGATTAACGTTG |
| NWMN_1067_+1542_R | GGAGGTCGTGTCATGAATGTTTG |