Dimitrios Stefanidis1, Brittany Anderson-Montoya2, Robert V Higgins3, Manuel E Pimentel4, Patrick Rowland2, Madison O Scarborough2, Danelle Higgins2. 1. Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC; Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC. Electronic address: dimitrios.stefanidis@carolinashealthcare.org. 2. Division of Quality, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC. 3. Department of OB/Gynecology, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC. 4. Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While performance feedback and assessment are hallmarks of surgical training, they abruptly cease after training is completed. In their absence, performance may stagnate and poor habits persist. Our aim was to develop a coaching mechanism for practicing surgeons with feedback provision based on objective performance assessment. METHODS: Technical and nontechnical intraoperative video recordings from laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomies, colectomies, and hysterectomies were assessed by a blinded surgeon and a human factors expert, respectively. Aspects of performance in need of improvement were noted, and a coaching session was developed for feedback provision to participating surgeons. This 4-hour coaching session consisted of a didactic lecture with video review and hands-on practice using procedural and mannequin-based simulation. RESULTS: Thirty-two practicing surgeons (18 general; 14 gynecologists) from 6 different hospitals were assessed, and 9 of them participated in coaching. Technical aspects identified for performance improvement included suboptimal trocar placement, inadequate critical view achievement during laparoscopic cholecystectomies, poor visualization of the operating field, bimanual dexterity, and dissection techniques, while nontechnical aspects included inappropriate handling of distractions and interruptions, poor ergonomic positioning and situational awareness, and inadequate mitigation of delays. Most surgeons appropriately accomplished some of the objectives of the distraction scenario, but none was able to achieve expert levels on Fundamentals of Laparoscopy tasks. Participants perceived the coaching sessions as highly valuable. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several technical and nontechnical skill sets of practicing surgeons in need of improvement and provided support for the implementation of coaching programs for surgeons on an ongoing basis.
BACKGROUND: While performance feedback and assessment are hallmarks of surgical training, they abruptly cease after training is completed. In their absence, performance may stagnate and poor habits persist. Our aim was to develop a coaching mechanism for practicing surgeons with feedback provision based on objective performance assessment. METHODS: Technical and nontechnical intraoperative video recordings from laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomies, colectomies, and hysterectomies were assessed by a blinded surgeon and a human factors expert, respectively. Aspects of performance in need of improvement were noted, and a coaching session was developed for feedback provision to participating surgeons. This 4-hour coaching session consisted of a didactic lecture with video review and hands-on practice using procedural and mannequin-based simulation. RESULTS: Thirty-two practicing surgeons (18 general; 14 gynecologists) from 6 different hospitals were assessed, and 9 of them participated in coaching. Technical aspects identified for performance improvement included suboptimal trocar placement, inadequate critical view achievement during laparoscopic cholecystectomies, poor visualization of the operating field, bimanual dexterity, and dissection techniques, while nontechnical aspects included inappropriate handling of distractions and interruptions, poor ergonomic positioning and situational awareness, and inadequate mitigation of delays. Most surgeons appropriately accomplished some of the objectives of the distraction scenario, but none was able to achieve expert levels on Fundamentals of Laparoscopy tasks. Participants perceived the coaching sessions as highly valuable. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several technical and nontechnical skill sets of practicing surgeons in need of improvement and provided support for the implementation of coaching programs for surgeons on an ongoing basis.
Authors: Jason C Pradarelli; Steven Yule; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nikhil Panda; Molly Craig; Kurt W Lowery; Stanley W Ashley; Denise W Gee; Peter M Waters; Jim Knight; Douglas S Smink Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Anand Malpani; S Swaroop Vedula; Henry C Lin; Gregory D Hager; Russell H Taylor Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Mary E Byrnes; Tedi A Engler; Sudha Pavuluri R Quamme; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 13.787