Literature DB >> 2730191

Carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of the results of transhiatal versus transthoracic resection.

J R Hankins1, S Attar, T R Coughlin, J E Miller, J R Hebel, C M Suter, J S McLaughlin.   

Abstract

The cases of 78 patients with primary esophageal carcinoma treated from 1977 to mid-1987 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two of the patients underwent transthoracic esophagogastrectomy (TTE) and 26, transhiatal esophagectomy (THE). The two groups were statistically similar in preoperative characteristics except that more of the THE group had received chemotherapy; this group had relatively more tumors of the upper esophagus; and 20 (77%) of the THE group, compared with 50 (96%) of the TTE group, had tumors in stages III and IV. The incidence of major postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were five (19%) anastomotic leaks in the THE group, but only one led to a prolongation of hospital stay by more than 14 days, whereas all three (6%) of the leaks in the TTE group caused hospital stay to be prolonged several weeks. Overall morbidity was high: 75% (39/52) for the TTE patients and 85% (22/26) for the THE patients (p greater than 0.10). Hospital mortality was 6% (3/52) in the TTE group and 8% (2/26) in the THE patients (p greater than 0.10). There was no significant difference in actuarial survival either between the two groups as a whole or between those patients in each group who had stage III or IV tumors. We conclude that THE, among the types of patients for whom we used the procedure, provides long-term survival comparable with that provided by TTE without causing a significant increase in hospital mortality or morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2730191     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90121-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  [Resection of esophageal cancer without thoracotomy by manual dissection and eversion stripping].

Authors:  J M Müller; U Zieren; A S Jerke; C Jacobi; M Adili; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

2.  Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications.

Authors:  Sumanta Dutta; Grant M Fullarton; Matthew J Forshaw; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents.

Authors:  Michael Hünerbein; Christian Stroszczynski; Kurt T Moesta; Peter M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Surgical management of esophageal cancer. A decade of change.

Authors:  J S Bolton; J L Ochsner; A A Abdoh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus. Technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  R Bumm; A H Hölscher; H Feussner; M Tachibana; H Bartels; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with the sump drainage tube.

Authors:  Qifan Yin; Shaohui Zhou; Yongbin Song; Xuejiao Xun; Nana Liu; Lijun Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  A Comparative Study between the Postoperative Complications of Stripping Esophagectomy and Classic (Orringer's Technique) Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Mozaffar Hashemi; Abbas Tabatabai
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 8.  Diagnosis and treatment of esophageal neoplasms.

Authors:  H Kato
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.