Literature DB >> 27301363

Why abandoning sustained implantation rate may be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Eric J Forman1, Jason M Franasiak2, George Patounakis3, Richard T Scott1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27301363      PMCID： PMC5007576          DOI： 10.1093/humrep/dew138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN： 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Beware of the 'implantation rate'! Why the outcome parameter 'implantation rate' should be abandoned from infertility research.

Authors:  G Griesinger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Zabeena Pandian; Allan Templeton; Gamal Serour; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Kathleen M Ferry; Xin Tao; Deanne Taylor; Brynn Levy; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 7.329
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein seropositivity from vaccination or infection does not cause sterility.

Authors:  Randy S Morris
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-06-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.