Literature DB >> 27299013

The Use of a 3D Printer in Pre-operative Planning for a Patient Requiring Acetabular Reconstructive Surgery.

James M Duncan1, Samuel Nahas2, Kashif Akhtar2, Jasvinder Daurka2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of acetabular fractures is often highly complex, and a successful outcome depends upon an appreciation of the fracture pattern and the most appropriate approach to reduce and hold it. Currently, computed tomography (CT) images are used in conjunction with plain x-rays to identify the main fracture components and their spatial relationship to one another, and as such surgeons still have to make decisions based upon their ability to visualise the fracture from the images available. 3D printers have now become widely available and inexpensive, and can be used to rapidly produce life-size models based on CT scans of an individual patient. The availability of patient specific, accurate and detailed models of complex acetabular fractures can aid planning of surgical management on a patient specific basis. CASE REPORT: This report describes the use of a 3D printer to create a life-size model reconstruction of the pelvis of a 48 year old male patient who sustained a left sided associated both column acetabular fracture following a motorbike accident in the Sahara Desert. The model allowed visualisation of the multiple fracture fragments and their relative displacements. The tactile feedback allowed assessment of the different fracture fragments. The relative displacement of the quadrilateral plate and posterior column fragments could be assessed and the surgeon felt that these would be amenable to reduction from an ilioinguinal approach. An anatomic reduction was achieved and was held with the application of a pelvic brim plate with 2 screws lagging the posterior column/quadrilateral plate fragment.
CONCLUSION: There are previous examples of 3D models being used in orthopaedic surgery through the use of rapid prototyping, however this method is usually expensive and time consuming. Advances in 3D printer technology offer surgeons a number of advantages when treating these complex fractures. With the ever-increasing economy, ease of use and speed of additive processing, the possible applications of this technology within orthopaedic surgery are numerous. Given the possible applications of this technology, and its ever increasing availability, we feel that its use can only improve patient outcomes and so should be explored further for use in orthopaedic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; acetabular reconstruction; trauma

Year:  2015        PMID: 27299013      PMCID: PMC4719345          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Introduction

Surgical management of acetabular fractures is often highly complex, and a successful outcome depends upon an appreciation of the fracture pattern and the most appropriate approach to reduce and hold it. The importance of the choice of approach as a prognostic indicator has been previously highlighted [1,2]. Currently, two- and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images are used in conjunction with plain x-rays to identify the main fracture components and their spatial relationship to one another. However, because these images are viewed on a screen, they give the surgeon limited insight into the physical configuration of the fracture and the optimal surgical management to be used [3,4]. Surgeons still have to make important decisions based upon a combination of their ability to visualise the fracture from the images available, and intraoperative direct fluoroscopy following fracture reduction [5]. 3D printers have now become widely available and inexpensive, and can be used to rapidly produce life-size models based on CT scans of an individual patient. The availability of patient specific, accurate and detailed models of complex acetabular fractures can aid planning of surgical management and allow a better appreciation of both the most appropriate approach and the reduction manoeuvres required on patient specific basis.

Case Report

This report describes the use of a 3D printer to create a life-size model reconstruction of the pelvis of a 48 year old male patient who sustained a left sided associated both column acetabular fracture following a motorbike accident in the Sahara Desert. The 3D print was created from the CT images taken of the patient, and was then used to help plan surgery and assist intra-operatively (Figs 1 & 2). The DICOM imaging files were converted to STL to enable printing on an Objet Eden 250 printer utilizing selective laser sintering of nylon (Stratasys Inc, Rehovot Israel).
Figure 1

AP image of the 3D print of the patients pelvis

Figure 2

Close up image of the acetabular fracture reconstructed in the 3D print

AP image of the 3D print of the patients pelvis Close up image of the acetabular fracture reconstructed in the 3D print The model allowed a visualisation of the multiple fracture fragments and their relative displacements. The tactile feedback allowed an assessment of the different fracture fragments. The relative displacement of the quadrilateral plate and posterior column fragments could be assessed and the surgeon felt that these would be amenable to reduction from an ilioinguinal approach. The confidence with which this could be decided preoperatively prevented the patient from undergoing a dual or an extensile approach. An anatomic reduction was achieved and this was held with the application of a pelvic brim plate with 2 screws lagging the posterior column/quadrilateral plate fragment (Fig 3).
Figure 3

AP radiograph of the patients pelvis following acetabular reconstructive surgery

AP radiograph of the patients pelvis following acetabular reconstructive surgery

Discussion

There are previous examples of 3D models being used in orthopaedic surgery through the use of rapid prototyping (6-8), however this method is usually expensive and time consuming, as the manufacturing process was much more difficult. Advances in 3D printer technology used in combination with user-friendly software and early CT scan assessment of injuries, offer surgeons a number of advantages when treating these complex fractures. It can allow better assessment of the nature of the injuries sustained, and give the surgeon better visuospatial appreciation of the relation of fracture fragments to one another, and therefore aid the decision regarding optimal approach to be used, and fixation technique including size of implants and trajectories of screws. This reduces over-all surgical time by assisting pre-operative planning, which in turn reduced the risk of a multitude of complications. With the ever-increasing economy, ease of use and speed of additive processing, the possible applications of this technology within orthopaedic surgery are numerous. There is also scope for the development of custom made implants and pre-contoured plates that are unique to a patient’s anatomy and fracture type and this has already been explored in maxillofacial surgery where direct laser metal sintering has been used to produce custom titanium miniplates (9). Clinical Message Given the possible applications of 3D printing technology in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, and its ever increasing availability, we feel that its use can only improve patient outcomes and so should be explored further for use in orthopaedic surgery.
  9 in total

1.  Rapid prototyping: the future of trauma surgery?

Authors:  George A Brown; Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh; Thomas A DeCoster; José R Reyna; Moheb Moneim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement.

Authors:  S P Krishnan; A Dawood; R Richards; J Henckel; A J Hart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11

3.  Custom-made prefabricated titanium miniplates in Le Fort I osteotomies: principles, procedure and clinical insights.

Authors:  B Philippe
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results.

Authors:  Jürgen Fornaro; Marius Keel; Matthias Harders; Borut Marincek; Gábor Székely; Thomas Frauenfelder
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Soheil Najibi; Joel M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  P V Giannoudis; M R W Grotz; C Papakostidis; H Dinopoulos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-01

Review 7.  Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Shirish Deshpande; Darshana D Rasalkar; Abhay Kuthe; Bhawan K Paunipagar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Application of computer-generated stereolithography and interpositioning template in acetabular fractures: a report of eight cases.

Authors:  George A Brown; Brenton Milner; Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction.

Authors:  Musa Citak; Michael J Gardner; Daniel Kendoff; Ségolène Tarte; Christian Krettek; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Tobias Hüfner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.494

  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in creating dissectible anatomical 3D prints for surgical teaching.

Authors:  Ratheesraj Ratinam; Michelle Quayle; John Crock; Michelle Lazarus; Quentin Fogg; Paul McMenamin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Anıl Murat Öztürk; Onur Süer; Suzan Şirintürk; Kemal Aktuğlu; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asım Özer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Utku Kandemir; Binfei Zhang; Chen Fei; Yan Zhuang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  [Application of three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of limb bone tumors].

Authors:  Xiaohui Niu; Tao Jin; Hairong Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

5.  Applications of 3D printing in healthcare.

Authors:  Helena Dodziuk
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 6.  A Review of Current Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Alan Varkey Job; Jing Chen; Jung Hwan Baek
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

7.  Digital anatomical study and clinical application of screw placement for quadrilateral plate fractures in the danger zone.

Authors:  Bei Zhao; Zhongye Sun; Wei Zhang; Zhongbao Xu; Xiaofei Yang; Weidong Mu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A novel 3D technique to assess symmetry of hemi pelvises.

Authors:  Peyman Bakhshayesh; Ahmed Zaghloul; Benjamin Michael Sephton; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Preoperative Planning Using 3D Printing Technology in Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Dereje Gobena Alemayehu; Zhi Zhang; Elena Tahir; Djovensky Gateau; Dang-Feng Zhang; Xing Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  3D printing in designing of anatomical posterior column plate.

Authors:  Lalit Maini; Abhishek Mishra; Gaurang Agarwal; Tarun Verma; Amit Sharma; Amit Tyagi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.