| Literature DB >> 27298729 |
Anne-Madeleine Bau1, Andrea Ernert1, Heiko Krude1, Susanna Wiegand1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Weight loss improves cardiovascular risk factors and "quality of life". Most therapeutic approaches fail to induce a sustained weight loss and most individuals undergo weight regain. In this paper the comprehensive design of the "MAINTAIN" study, all assessments as well as the one year lifestyle intervention will be outlined in detail. METHODS/Entities:
Keywords: Childhood obesity; Hormonal regulation; Lifestyle intervention; Residential weight reduction
Year: 2016 PMID: 27298729 PMCID: PMC4901466 DOI: 10.1186/s40608-016-0110-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Obes ISSN: 2052-9538
Fig. 1General study flow chart
Fig. 2BABELUGA lifestyle monitoring map with target values
Fig. 3Flow diagram of participant trial children and adolescents November 2015
Fig. 4Randomization allocation sequence
Frequency distribution of baseline study population (in total) and intervention and control group (after residential weight reduction programme), (N = 137)
| Total | Intervention | Control | p-values. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=137 | N=65 | N=72 | |||||
| sex | male | N(%) | 65 (47.4) | 32 (49.2) | 33 (45.8) | 0.691*** | |
| female | N(%) | 72 (52.6) | 33 (50.8) | 39 (54.2) | |||
| age (years) | at recruitment (T-3) | mean (±sd) | 13.65 (±1.88) | 13.85 (±1.94) | 13.47 (±1.82) | 0.236* | |
| at randomisation (T0) | mean (±sd) | 13.97 (±1.86) | 14.17 (±1.93) | 13.79 (±1.80) | 0.237* | ||
| pubertal stage | at recruitment (T-3) | prepubertal | N(%) | 16 (11.7) | 7 (10.8) | 9 (12.5) | 0.368** |
| interpubertal | N(%) | 51 (37.2) | 22 (33.8) | 29 (40.3) | |||
| postpubertal | N(%) | 70 (51.1) | 36 (55.4) | 34 (47.2) | |||
| at randomisation (T0) | prepubertal | N(%) | 10 (7.3) | 4 (6.2) | 6 (8.3) | 0.203** | |
| interpubertal | N(%) | 42 (30.7) | 17 (26.2) | 25 (34.7) | |||
| postpubertal | N(%) | 85 (62.0) | 44 (67.7) | 41 (56.9) | |||
| Migration background | German | N(%) | 67 (48.9) | 30 (46.2) | 37 (51.4) | 0.639*** | |
| Turkish | N(%) | 39 (28.5) | 18 (27.7) | 21 (29.2) | |||
| other | N(%) | 31 (22.6) | 17 (26.2) | 14 (19.4) | |||
| Education background (parents) | No certificate | N(%) | 6 (4.4) | 2 (3.1) | 4 (5.6) | 0.797*** | |
| General education | N(%) | 17 (12.4) | 6 (9.2) | 11 (15.3) | |||
| Secondary modern school | N(%) | 58 (42.3) | 28 (43.1) | 30 (41.7) | |||
| Grammar school | N(%) | 29 (21.2) | 14 (21.5) | 15 (20.8) | |||
| college of higher education, university | N(%) | 19 (13.9) | 11 (16.9) | 8 (11.1) | |||
| other | N(%) | 8 (5.8) | 4 (6.2) | 4 (5.6) | |||
| Education background (parents) | lower level | N(%) | 23 (16.8) | 8 (12.3) | 15 (20.8) | 0.587*** | |
| middle level | N(%) | 58 (42.3) | 28 (43.1) | 30 (41.7) | |||
| higher level | N(%) | 48 (35.0) | 25 (38.5) | 23 (31.9) | |||
| others | N(%) | 8 (5.8) | 4 (6.2) | 4 (5.6) | |||
| BMI-SDS | at recruitment (T-3) | mean (±sd) | 2.52 (±.40) | 2.51 (±.38) | 2.52 (±.42) | 0.851* | |
| at randomisation (T0) | mean (±sd) | 2.10 (±.47) | 2.06 (±.47) | 2.14 (±.47) | 0.333* | ||
*t-test for independent samples/ ** Man-Whitney-U-test/ *** Chi-square-test
Intervention Group Attendance
| Group attendance | |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | 29.2 % ( |
| 4–7 | 40.0 % ( |
| 8–10 | 30.8 % ( |
Modules description regarding relevant BABELUGA lifestyle monitoring map, learning target, methods and instruments
| Module and title | BABELUGA lifestyle monitoring item | Learning targets | Methods and instruments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.“How to do your shopping”: Food- and drink selection in the supermarket | “Food choice” and “Beverage selection” | Participants know how a healthy and balanced diet can be realised with the right selection of food, drinks and meal-composition. | Introducing lecture on food labelling, declarations, health claims, listing of ingredients and processed vs. natural foods. |
| 2. “Fast Lunch: quick and easy recipes to cook for yourself” | “Food choice”, “Portion size and food intake”, “Meals and In-Between-eating” | Participants clearly understand the advantages of regular mealtimes and commonly shares at least one regular meal daily, where new strategies, such as trying new foods or cooking smaller portions, are realised. | After a short introduction about food preparation, suitable serving size, right choice of ingredients considering energy intake, as well as time management and a lecture on how to integrate the preparation and the consumption of a warm meal for lunch into the day, parents and children are separated in groups. |
| 3. “Family: Thrilling teamwork” | “Moods and feelings” | Participants accept and understand that child obesity is a family issue, which can only be approached successfully if the whole family cooperates. | Parents and children are separated and each participant obtains a work sheet with “Power-questions” referring to positive aspects of life in general and specifically of family life. Parents, for example, are asked, what fills them with pride about their child and children are asked what makes them feel content about their parents. The task is completed individually and will not be discussed in the group. |
| 4. “No food all day, until facing the fridge in the afternoon alone”: Meal-distribution and planning. Recipes for healthy snacks and spreads. | “Food choice”, “Beverage selection”, “Portion size and food intake”, “Meals and In-between eating”, “Sweets, Fast Food and Snacks” | Participants are familiar with the concept of performance curves and know how to optimise their daily activity level by planning meal intake accordingly. | Timeline: each participant reflects on his or her own scheduling of daily meals and marks times and type of meal on a timeline |
| 5. “How to REALLY ENJOY YOUR MEAL and how to deal with cravings”: Training joyful eating and development of strategies to deal with cravings effectively | “Food choice”, “Beverage selection”, “Portion size and food intake”, “Meals and In-between eating”, “Sweets, Fast Food and Snacks” | Feelings of hunger, appetite and satiety can be appropriately differentiated by participants. | Parents and children are separated in groups and each group works on finding “reasons to eat and drink”. Answers are collected and sorted into categories: physical requirements, psychological requirements. Differences are accentuated and discussed. The importance of avoiding ravenous hunger and craving is discussed and prevention methods are elaborated. |
| 6. “Eating on the way: How to prepare healthy Fast Food” | “Food choice” “Beverage selection”, “Sweets, Fast Food and Snacks” | Children and parents correctly recognise sweets, snacks and fast food. | Each participant presents his or her favourite fast food. In small groups participants collect preferred fast foods and then reflect on situations when these foods are eaten mostly. |
| 7. “Getting fitter with each step”: Exercise and recreation | “Daily activity”, “Sports” “Moods and feelings” | Children experience and accept sports and daily activity as part of daily routine. | Based on the |
| 8. “Need a holiday? Dealing with stress and preventing relapse. | “Moods and feelings” | Participants understand to what extent moods, emotions and psychosocial strains can influence eating- and physical behaviour. | In small groups parents and children discuss difficult and stressful situations in which the risk of reviving old habits becomes apparent. |
| 9. “Don’t miss the fun: How to celebrate every party the right way” | “Food choice”, “Beverage selection”, “Portion size and food intake” | Participants learn to resist temptation in difficult situations such as celebrations and holidays, where daily routine is disrupted and acquired patters are put on hold. | Practical examples of tempting situations are discussed: Buffets, Parties |
| 10. “Creative Cooking: How to modify recipes, creating your own style” | “Food choice”, “Beverage selection”, “Portion size and food intake” | Participants know how to modify recipes, reducing amounts of sugar and fat as well as using alternatives, such as whole grain flour instead of white flour. | An introductory lecture is given on healthy alternatives to meat and dishes containing a high amount of recommended foods are presented. |
Summary of assessments (children/adolescents)
| Measure | T-3 | T0 | T12 | T18, T24 | T36, T48 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Recruitment) | (Randomisation) | (12 months) | (18 and 24 months) | (36 and 48 months) | |
| In-depth medical evaluation | |||||
| Individual medical history | X | X | X | X | X |
| Family-related medical history | X | ||||
| Growth and development in infancy | X | ||||
| Demographic status (social and migration background) | X | ||||
| Performance at school | X | X | X | X | X |
| Exercise/sports per week | X | X | X | X | X |
| Meal times during week and weekend | X | X | X | X | X |
| BABELUGA lifestyle monitoring items | X | X | X | X | |
| Anthropometry | |||||
| General physical examination | X | X | X | X | X |
| Height and weight, skin wrinkle | X | X | X | X | X |
| Waist and hip circumference | X | X | X | X | X |
| Blood pressure | X | X | X | X | X |
| Physical Performance | |||||
| Resting energy expenditure (REE) | X | X | X | X | X |
| Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) | X | X | X | X | X |
| Leonardo GRFP Mechanography Measurement | X | X | X | X | |
| Hand Dynamic | X | X | X | X | |
| Munich fitness test (mMFT) | X | X | X (at T24) | ||
| Intima media thickness (IMT) | X | X | X | ||
| Laboratory tests | |||||
| Fasting blood sample (Chem and Endo Lab) | X | X | X | X | X |
| Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, 3h) | X | X | X | X | X |
| Cortisol kinetics | X | ||||
| Salivary profile/ Cortisol | X | X (at T24) | |||
| 24-hour urine collection | X | ||||
| Diet history interview (DISHES-98) ( | X | X | X | X ( at T24) | |
| Psychological diagnostic Children/ adolescent | |||||
| Child Behavior Checklist (Parents, CBCL/4-18 ( | X | X | |||
| Youth self report (YSR/11-18) ( | X | X | |||
| Fear Survey Schedule for Children-Revised (FSSC-R, PHOKI) | X | X | X | ||
| Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI, DIKJ) von J. Stiensmeier-Pelster, M. Braune-Krickau, M. Schürmann, K. Duda | X | X | X | X | |
| the Beck Depression Inventory (for adults >18 years, BDI II) von A.T. Beck, R.A. Steer, G.K. Brown, M. Hautzinger, F. Keller, C. Kühner | X | X | |||
| Questionnaire about Health status and quality of life (for adults >18 years, SF 36) (M. Morfeld, I. Kirchberger, M. Bullinger) | X | X | |||
| General quality of life – KIDSCREEN-52 (self-report) | X | X | X | X | |
| Obesity-related quality of life - KINDL® Obesity Module (self-report) | X | X | X | X | X |
| General self-efficacy – | X | X | X | X | X |
| Body size/shape perception based on a child-specific adaptation and Figure Rating Scale | X | X | X | X | |
| Family Affluence Scale II, adolescent self-report measure | X | X | X (at T24) | X | |
| General quality of life – KIDSCREEN-52 (parent-proxy) | X | X | X | ||
| Obesity-related quality of life - KINDL® Obesity Module (parent-proxy) | X | X | X | ||
| Body size/shape perception based on a child-specific adaptation and Figure Rating Scale | X | X | X |