| Literature DB >> 27297241 |
Michal Rolinski1, Ludovica Griffanti2, Paola Piccini3, Andreas A Roussakis3, Konrad Szewczyk-Krolikowski1, Ricarda A Menke2, Timothy Quinnell4, Zenobia Zaiwalla5, Johannes C Klein6, Clare E Mackay7, Michele T M Hu8.
Abstract
SEE POSTUMA DOI101093/AWW131 FOR A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY ON THIS ARTICLE: Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging dysfunction within the basal ganglia network is a feature of early Parkinson's disease and may be a diagnostic biomarker of basal ganglia dysfunction. Currently, it is unclear whether these changes are present in so-called idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, a condition associated with a high rate of future conversion to Parkinson's disease. In this study, we explore the utility of resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging to detect basal ganglia network dysfunction in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder. We compare these data to a set of healthy control subjects, and to a set of patients with established early Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we explore the relationship between resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging basal ganglia network dysfunction and loss of dopaminergic neurons assessed with dopamine transporter single photon emission computerized tomography, and perform morphometric analyses to assess grey matter loss. Twenty-six patients with polysomnographically-established rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, 48 patients with Parkinson's disease and 23 healthy control subjects were included in this study. Resting state networks were isolated from task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging data using dual regression with a template derived from a separate cohort of 80 elderly healthy control participants. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging parameter estimates were extracted from the study subjects in the basal ganglia network. In addition, eight patients with rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, 10 with Parkinson's disease and 10 control subjects received (123)I-ioflupane single photon emission computerized tomography. We tested for reduction of basal ganglia network connectivity, and for loss of tracer uptake in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder and Parkinson's disease relative to each other and to controls. Connectivity measures of basal ganglia network dysfunction differentiated both rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder and Parkinson's disease from controls with high sensitivity (96%) and specificity (74% for rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, 78% for Parkinson's disease), indicating its potential as an indicator of early basal ganglia dysfunction. Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder was indistinguishable from Parkinson's disease on resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging despite obvious differences on dopamine transported single photon emission computerized tomography. Basal ganglia connectivity is a promising biomarker for the detection of early basal ganglia network dysfunction, and may help to identify patients at risk of developing Parkinson's disease in the future. Future risk stratification using a polymodal approach could combine basal ganglia network connectivity with clinical and other imaging measures, with important implications for future neuroprotective trials in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; imaging; rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27297241 PMCID: PMC4958897 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Comparison of clinical characteristics in RBD, Parkinson’s disease and control groups
| Variable | RBD ( | Parkinson’s disease | Controls ( |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | RBD versus PD versus Controls | RBD versus PD | RBD versus Controls | |||
| UPDRS III | 3.3 (3.5) | 26.4(12.3) | 0.7 (1.1) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.067 |
| BDI | 9.1 (8.6) | 7.7 (4.6) | 4.9 (5.6) | 0.035 | 0.40 | 0.020 |
| Leeds Depression | 3.9 (3.6) | 3.7 (3.0) | 2.9 (3.0) | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.17 |
| Leeds Anxiety | 2.9 (2.3) | 2.6 (2.4) | 1.9 (2.7) | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.022 |
| MoCA | 25.3 (2.9) | 27.4 (2.3) | 28.2 (1.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| MMSE | 27.3 (1.7) | 28.5 (1.5) | 29.3 (1.0) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Phonemic fluency | 10.9 (4.7) | 12.9 (3.8) | 15.0 (3.0) | 0.006 | 0.046 | <0.001 |
| Semantic fluency | 9.8 (3.1) | 11.3 (2.9) | 13.2 (3.0) | 0.003 | 0.048 | <0.001 |
PD = Parkinson’s disease; BDI = Becks Depression Inventory; MoCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination
aKruskal-Wallis.
bDunn’s test for pairwise comparisons.
cAdjusted for education years.
dFluencies are age adjusted.
Data shown are mean (SD).
Clinical characteristics of SPECT participants
| RBD patients | Healthy controls | Parkinson’s disease patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 8 | 10 | 10 |
| Sex ratio (male:female) | 6M:2F | 5M:5F | 6M:4F |
| Age at the time of the scan (years) | 68.5 ± 6.80 | 60.5 ± 8.90 | 68.6 ± 6.10 |
| MMSE score | 28.4 ± 1.30 | 29.7 ± 0.67 | 28.5 ± 1.08 |
| Hoehn and Yahr stage | n/a | n/a | 1 ± 0 |
| Disease duration from onset (years) | 6.3 ± 3.20 | n/a | 1.5 ± 0.62 |
| Disease duration from diagnosis (years) | 5.3 ± 3.01 | n/a | 0.4 ± 0.59 |
Data represent mean ± 1 SD.
MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; n/a = not applicable
Figure 1Results of resting state functional MRI analysis. Group difference maps illustrate clusters of significantly reduced connectivity (blue) in patients with (A) Parkinson’s disease and (B) RBD, when compared to healthy controls. Clusters are thresholded at P < 0.05 after TFCE correction. A map of the BGN in shown in orange (thresholded at Z < 2.6).
Regions showing significantly lower basal ganglia network activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease and RBD, compared to healthy controls
| Cluster location | Cluster size (voxels) | Most significant voxel (MNI coordinates: |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| L putamen | 1583 | −24, 4, 0 |
| R paracingulate gyrus | 1493 | 4, 26, 42 |
| R putamen | 1127 | 24, 12, 8 |
| L inferior temporal gyrus | 324 | −58, −52, −12 |
| R putamen | 216 | 28, 0, −10 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus | 133 | −50, 10, 12 |
| L frontal pole | 105 | 48, 26, 28 |
|
| ||
| L putamen (extending into R putamen) | 11 639 | −24, 6, 0 |
| R frontal orbital cortex | 703 | 50, 28, −12 |
| L frontal orbital cortex | 455 | −26, 18, −12 |
| R middle frontal gyrus | 133 | 42, 16, 36 |
| R cingulate gyrus | 66 | 16, −38, 32 |
| L middle temporal gyrus | 36 | −54, −16, −16 |
| L middle temporal gyrus | 16 | −62, −46, 0 |
L = left; R = right.
P < 0.05 FWE corrected, cluster ≥10 voxels.
Figure 2Mean parameter estimates extracted from significant clusters that appeared in both the healthy controls versus Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls versus RBD comparisons. Each boxplot represents (from bottom to top) quartile 1, median, and quartile 3, with whiskers representing the minimum and maximum mean parameter estimate (P.E.) values for the group.
Figure 3Mean parameter estimates extracted from anatomical regions. The mean parameter estimate (P.E.) values were significantly lower in both the Parkinson’s disease and RBD groups, when compared to the healthy control group, in all four areas tested. There was no significant difference in any of the regions when RBD patients were compared to those with established Parkinson’s disease. The bars represent the group mean and the standard error of the mean. P-values corrected using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Uptake values of 123I-ioflupane SPECT
| RBD patients | Healthy controls | Parkinson’s disease patients | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Striatum | 2.93 ± 0.45 | 3.26 ± 0.30 | 2.15 ± 0.52***,† |
| Caudate | 3.19 ± 0.70 | 3.43 ± 0.43 | 2.47 ± 0.53**,† |
| Putamen | 2.69 ± 0.39 | 3.10 ± 0.29 | 1.86 ± 0.54***,† |
| Anterior putamen | 3.03 ± 0.46 | 3.50 ± 0.33 | 2.20 ± 0.63*** |
| Posterior putamen | 2.32 ± 0.44 | 2.67 ± 0.32 | 1.30 ± 0.44***,† |
Data represent mean ± 1 SD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Comparison to *controls, or †RBD at P < 0.05
Figure 4Each boxplot represents (from bottom to top) quartile 1, median, and quartile 3, with whiskers representing the minimum and maximum 123I–ioflupane binding for the group. HC = healthy controls; PD = Parkinson’s disease.