Literature DB >> 27295181

Quantifying lip-read-induced suppression and facilitation of the auditory N1 and P2 reveals peak enhancements and delays.

Martijn Baart1,2.   

Abstract

Lip-read speech suppresses and speeds up the auditory N1 and P2 peaks, but these effects are not always observed or reported. Here, the robustness of lip-read-induced N1/P2 suppression and facilitation in phonetically congruent audiovisual speech was assessed by analyzing peak values that were taken from published plots and individual data. To determine whether adhering to the additive model of AV integration (i.e., A+V ≠ AV, or AV-V ≠ A) is critical for correct characterization of lip-read-induced effects on the N1 and P2, auditory data was compared to AV and to AV-V. On average, the N1 and P2 were consistently suppressed and sped up by lip-read information, with no indication that AV integration effects were significantly modulated by whether or not V was subtracted from AV. To assess the possibility that variability in observed N1/P2 amplitudes and latencies may explain why N1/P2 suppression and facilitation are not always found, additional correlations between peak values and size of the AV integration effects were computed. These analyses showed that N1/P2 peak values correlated with the size of AV integration effects. However, it also became apparent that a portion of the AV integration effects was characterized by lip-read-induced peak enhancements and delays rather than suppressions and facilitations, which, for the individual data, seemed related to particularly small/early A-only peaks and large/late AV(-V) peaks.
© 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords:  Audiovisual integration; ERPs; Language/speech; Meta analyses

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27295181     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  13 in total

1.  Cross-modal effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Megan Keough; Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Avril Treille; Coriandre Vilain; Sonia Kandel; Marc Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The impact of when, what and how predictions on auditory speech perception.

Authors:  Serge Pinto; Pascale Tremblay; Anahita Basirat; Marc Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.

Authors:  Elina Kaplan; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Combined predictive effects of sentential and visual constraints in early audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Heidi Solberg Økland; Ana Todorović; Claudia S Lüttke; James M McQueen; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Musical Expertise Affects Audiovisual Speech Perception: Findings From Event-Related Potentials and Inter-trial Phase Coherence.

Authors:  Marzieh Sorati; Dawn Marie Behne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 7.  Development of the Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Speech Perception Benefit.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-05

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for differences between fusion and combination illusions in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Alma Lindborg; Tobias S Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Audiovisual Modulation in Music Perception for Musicians and Non-musicians.

Authors:  Marzieh Sorati; Dawn Marie Behne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-29

10.  Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual Speech Processing and the Role of Orofacial Effectors for Cross-Modal Predictions.

Authors:  Maëva Michon; Gonzalo Boncompte; Vladimir López
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.