Literature DB >> 27294718

Lipreading and audiovisual speech recognition across the adult lifespan: Implications for audiovisual integration.

Nancy Tye-Murray1, Brent Spehar1, Joel Myerson2, Sandra Hale2, Mitchell Sommers2.   

Abstract

In this study of visual (V-only) and audiovisual (AV) speech recognition in adults aged 22-92 years, the rate of age-related decrease in V-only performance was more than twice that in AV performance. Both auditory-only (A-only) and V-only performance were significant predictors of AV speech recognition, but age did not account for additional (unique) variance. Blurring the visual speech signal decreased speech recognition, and in AV conditions involving stimuli associated with equivalent unimodal performance for each participant, speech recognition remained constant from 22 to 92 years of age. Finally, principal components analysis revealed separate visual and auditory factors, but no evidence of an AV integration factor. Taken together, these results suggest that the benefit that comes from being able to see as well as hear a talker remains constant throughout adulthood and that changes in this AV advantage are entirely driven by age-related changes in unimodal visual and auditory speech recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27294718      PMCID: PMC4910521          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  51 in total

1.  Perceptual fusion and stimulus coincidence in the cross-modal integration of speech.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Auditory filters measured at neighboring center frequencies.

Authors:  M A Fagelson; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Raquel K Zemtsov; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-13

7.  Effects of aging on audio-visual speech integration.

Authors:  Aurélie Huyse; Jacqueline Leybaert; Frédéric Berthommier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

9.  Longitudinal study of changes in speech perception between 70 and 81 years of age.

Authors:  K E Pedersen; U Rosenhall; M B Møller
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991

10.  Speech-associated gestures, Broca's area, and the human mirror system.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  21 in total

1.  Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Face viewing behavior predicts multisensory gain during speech perception.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Kira Wegner-Clemens; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

3.  Effects of age and left hemisphere lesions on audiovisual integration of speech.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelis; Laura C Erickson; Mackenzie E Fama; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Shihui Xing; Elizabeth H Lacey; Zainab Anbari; Gina Norato; Josef P Rauschecker; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Julie I Cohen; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; ZhaoBin Li; Lucia Ray; Ellen Mamantov; Kristin J Van Engen; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Hannah M Willison; Maya S Freund
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Predicting Audiovisual Word Recognition in Noisy Situations: Toward Precision Audiology.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Sandra Hale; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension.

Authors:  Louise Schubotz; Judith Holler; Linda Drijvers; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-05

10.  Shifts in Audiovisual Processing in Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.