| Literature DB >> 27294367 |
Jin Yong Hong1, Mun Kyung Sunwoo2, Jungsu S Oh3, Jae Seung Kim3, Young H Sohn4, Phil Hyu Lee4,5.
Abstract
Functional neuroimaging for the dopamine transporter (DAT) is used to distinguish drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) from subclinical Parkinson's disease (PD). Although DIP patients who show a normal DAT image are expected to recover completely, some do not. We investigated whether these patients showed changes in striatal DAT activity using semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FP-CIT PET data. DIP patients with visually normal DAT images were selected from medical records. The subjects were classified as patients who recovered partially (PR) or completely within 12 months (CR). The 18F-FP-CIT uptake in each striatal subregion was compared between the CR and the PR groups. In total, 41 and 9 patients of the CR and PR groups were assessed, respectively. The two patient groups were comparable in terms of clinical characteristics including age, sex, and severity of parkinsonism. From semi-quantitative analysis of the PET image, the PR patients showed a relatively lower ligand uptake in the ventral striatum, the anterior putamen and the posterior putamen compared with the CR patients. This result suggests that persistent DIP in patients with visually normal DAT imaging may be associated with subtle decrement of DAT activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27294367 PMCID: PMC4905632 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Normal data of 18F-FP-CIT uptake.
Mean value and standard deviation (SD) of each striatal subregions were from 68 healthy controls. Patient who showed uptake lower than mean-2SD in any subregion was excluded from this study.
| Caudate | Ventral striatum | Whole putamen | Anterior putamen | Posterior putamen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.53 | 3.12 | 3.43 | 3.75 | 3.23 |
| SD | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.63 |
| Mean-2SD | 1.23 | 1.84 | 2.05 | 2.13 | 1.97 |
SD: standard deviation
Demographic characteristics of the subjects.
| PR (n = 9) | CR (n = 41) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female, n | 5/4 | 10/31 | 0.106 | |
| Age at PET scan, yr | 70.7 (66.0–77.0) | 71.5 (67.8–77.0) | 1.000 | |
| Age at onset of parkinsonism, yr | 69.9 (64.9–75.9) | 70.3 (66.7–75.5) | 0.882 | |
| Time from onset to PET scan, yr | 1.0 (0.4–1.6) | 0.4 (0.2–1.4) | 0.921 | |
| UPDRS motor score | 27 (20–36) | 27 (20–33) | 0.637 | |
| Offending drugs | 0.878 | |||
| Antiemetic | 5 (56%) | 18 (44%) | ||
| Flunarizine | 2 (22%) | 7 (17%) | ||
| Diltiazem | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | ||
| Valproate | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | ||
| Antipsychotic | 1 (11%) | 2 (5%) | ||
| SSRI | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | ||
| Two or more | 1 (11%) | 8 (20%) |
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or n (%).
PR: patients who recovered partially; CR: patients who recovered completely, PET: Positron emission tomography; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale; N/A: not applicable.
a Chi-square test
b Mann-Whitney U test
Clinical information for partially recovered patients with drug-induced parkinsonism.
| Patients | sex | Age of onset (yr) | Starting offender–onset (mo) | Onset—visit hospital (mo) | Initial symptoms | Follow-up symptoms | Follow-up (mo) | Offending drug | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPDRS III | RT | PT | R | BK | PI | UPDRS III | RT | PT | R | BK | PI | |||||||
| 1 | M | 65 | 10 | 12 | 20 | -/- | ++/++ | ++/++ | +/+ | + | 10 | -/- | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | - | 60 | Amitriptyline, mirtazapine |
| 2 | M | 65 | 6 | 3 | 40 | -/- | ++/+++ | ++/++ | +++/+++ | + | 7 | -/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | - | 27 | Flunarizine |
| 3 | M | 70 | 4 | 9 | 32 | -/+ | +/++ | ++/++ | ++/++ | - | 7 | -/- | -/- | -/+ | -/+ | - | 26 | Flunarizine |
| 4 | M | 75 | 2 | 1 | 25 | -/++ | +/+ | -/+ | ++/++ | - | 9 | -/- | -/+ | -/+ | -/+ | - | 41 | Levosulpiride |
| 5 | M | 83 | 2 | 1 | 27 | -/- | -/- | ++/+++ | ++/+++ | + | 9 | -/- | -/- | -/+ | -/+ | - | 38 | Levosulpiride |
| 6 | F | 53 | 1 | 12 | 56 | ++/+ | +++/+++ | +++/++ | +++/+++ | + | 9 | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | - | 26 | Metoclopramide |
| 7 | F | 67 | 24 | 26 | 20 | +/+ | ++/+ | +/+ | ++/+ | + | 10 | -/- | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | - | 57 | Perphenazine |
| 8 | F | 75 | 1 | 2 | 32 | -/- | +/+ | -/+ | +/++ | ++ | 10 | -/- | +/+ | -/+ | -/+ | - | 42 | Levosulpiride |
| 9 | F | 77 | 12 | 24 | 19 | +/- | +/+ | +/- | +/+ | - | 6 | -/- | +/- | +/- | +/- | - | 12 | Levosulpiride |
RT: rest tremor; PT: postural tremor; R: rigidity; BK: bradykinesia; PI: postural instability
The 18F-FP-CIT uptake in striatal subregions.
| PR | CR | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate | 2.20 (1.74–2.61) | 2.54 (2.18–3.11) | 0.069 | |
| Ventral striatum | 2.85 (2.19–3.39) | 3.38 (2.92–3.76) | 0.018 | |
| Putamen | 2.85 (2.31–3.39) | 3.39 (2.96–4.05) | 0.016 | |
| Anterior | 3.13 (2.46–3.74) | 3.67 (3.19–4.39) | 0.018 | |
| Posterior | 2.67 (2.16–3.18) | 3.21 (2.82–3.83) | 0.017 |
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
PR: patients who recovered partially; CR: patients who recovered completely
Fig 1The 18F-FP-CIT uptake in the striatal subregions of partially (PR) and completely recovered (CR) patients and healthy controls (HC).