Literature DB >> 27294034

Current status of breast reconstruction in China: an experience of 951 breast reconstructions from a single institute.

Nai-Si Huang1, Chen-Lian Quan1, Lin-Xiao-Xi Ma1, Jing Si1, Jia-Jian Chen1, Ben-Long Yang1, Xiao-Yan Huang1, Guang-Yu Liu1, Zhen-Zhou Shen1, Zhi-Min Shao1, Jiong Wu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since mastectomy remained the primary strategy for treating breast cancer in China, post-mastectomy reconstruction is of great importance in the Chinese population. The current study aimed to assess the current status of breast reconstruction in China.
METHODS: We reviewed all patients who received breast reconstruction from August 2000 to July 2015 in the Department of Breast Surgery in our institute. Patients' baseline characteristics, reconstruction strategy, final pathology and loco-regional recurrence (LRR) information were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 951 breast reconstructions were conducted during the past 15 years, among which 247 (27.0%) were abdominal flap reconstruction; 471 (51.5%) were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous ± implant; and 233 (25.5%) were prosthesis-based reconstruction. The majority of cases (78.1%) were invasive breast cancer and up to 894 cases (94.0%) were immediate reconstruction. Prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly increased in recent years, and was associated with bilateral reconstruction, contralateral augmentation and higher complications. 18 patients (2.0%) developed local-regional recurrence at the median follow-up time of 26.6 months (range, 3.7-62.0 months). A total of 66 nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) (6.9%) were performed, none of which developed recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction cases increased over the 15 years with the change of paradigm. Most strikingly, prosthesis-based reconstruction rapidly gained its prevalence and became the most common strategy. NSM was only performed for highly selected patients. Patients with breast reconstruction were able to achieve satisfactory loco-regional control in our cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; China; breast cancer; current status

Year:  2016        PMID: 27294034      PMCID: PMC4884702          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.03.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  23 in total

1.  A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.

Authors:  Yeliz Cemal; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  [Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China: a survey report].

Authors:  Ying Chen; Jiajian Chen; Jiaying Chen; Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Xiaoyan Huang; Zhimin Shao; Zhenzhou Shen; Peirong Yu; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi       Date:  2014-11

3.  Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Aslin Gurunluoglu; Susan A Williams; Seth Tebockhorst
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Paget's disease as a local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Visnu Lohsiriwat; Stefano Martella; Mario Rietjens; Edoardo Botteri; Nicole Rotmensz; Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Maria Sommario; Benedetta Barbieri; Maximiliano Cassilha; Ilaria Minotti; Jean Yves Petit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Nipple sparing mastectomy: Surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period.

Authors:  Lorenzo Orzalesi; Donato Casella; Caterina Santi; Lorenzo Cecconi; Roberto Murgo; Stefano Rinaldi; Lea Regolo; Claudio Amanti; Manuela Roncella; Margherita Serra; Graziano Meneghini; Massimiliano Bortolini; Vittorio Altomare; Carlo Cabula; Francesca Catalano; Alfredo Cirilli; Francesco Caruso; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Luigi Cataliotti; Marco Bernini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?

Authors:  F Didier; D Radice; S Gandini; R Bedolis; N Rotmensz; A Maldifassi; B Santillo; A Luini; V Galimberti; E Scaffidi; F Lupo; S Martella; J Y Petit
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  No difference in dose distribution in organs at risk in postmastectomy radiotherapy with or without breast implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Annelie Liljegren; Dmytro Unukovych; Giovanna Gagliardi; Judith Bjöhle; Marie Wickman; Hemming Johansson; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: From an Oncologic Safety Perspective.

Authors:  Nai-Si Huang; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes between immediate implantbased and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Shanshan He; Bowen Ding; Gang Li; Yubei Huang; Chunyong Han; Jingyan Sun; Qingfeng Huang; Jing Liu; Zhuming Yin; Shu Wang; Jian Yin
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.347

2.  The Effect of Low and High Vacuum Drainage on the Postoperative Drainage of Breast Cancer: Insights from a Prospective, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Wanyi Lin; Yaping Yang; Wenjing Zhong; Qun Lin; Nanyan Rao; Gehao Liang; Yun Ling; Zihao Liu; Qing Luo; Zhenluan Tian; Chang Gong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study from China.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Xiaorong Zhong; Wei Zhang; Ting Luo; Ping He; Hong Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer through endoscopic approach combined with the implant after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction of mastectomy patients.

Authors:  Jian-Xun Ma; Bi Li; You-Chen Xia; Wei-Tao You; Jie Zhang; Yi-Mou Sun; Xu Chang; Yue Lang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Assessing the relationship between body image and quality of life among rural and urban breast cancer survivors in China.

Authors:  Jinghua An; Kaina Zhou; Minjie Li; Xiaomei Li
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Comparison between ultrasound-guided aspiration performed using an intravenous cannula or a conventional needle in patients with peri-prosthetic seroma.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Wan Wook Kim; Chan Sub Park; Ryu Kyung Lee; Jung Dug Yang; Joon Seok Lee; Jin Hyang Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.