Literature DB >> 27290639

New perspective in diagnostics of mitochondrial disorders: two years' experience with whole-exome sequencing at a national paediatric centre.

Ewa Pronicka1,2, Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk3, Elżbieta Ciara3, Joanna Trubicka3, Dariusz Rokicki4, Agnieszka Karkucińska-Więckowska5, Magdalena Pajdowska6, Elżbieta Jurkiewicz7, Paulina Halat3, Joanna Kosińska8, Agnieszka Pollak9, Małgorzata Rydzanicz8, Piotr Stawinski9, Maciej Pronicki5, Małgorzata Krajewska-Walasek3, Rafał Płoski10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has led to an exponential increase in identification of causative variants in mitochondrial disorders (MD).
METHODS: We performed WES in 113 MD suspected patients from Polish paediatric reference centre, in whom routine testing failed to identify a molecular defect. WES was performed using TruSeqExome enrichment, followed by variant prioritization, validation by Sanger sequencing, and segregation with the disease phenotype in the family.
RESULTS: Likely causative mutations were identified in 67 (59.3 %) patients; these included variants in mtDNA (6 patients) and nDNA: X-linked (9 patients), autosomal dominant (5 patients), and autosomal recessive (47 patients, 11 homozygotes). Novel variants accounted for 50.5 % (50/99) of all detected changes. In 47 patients, changes in 31 MD-related genes (ACAD9, ADCK3, AIFM1, CLPB, COX10, DLD, EARS2, FBXL4, MTATP6, MTFMT, MTND1, MTND3, MTND5, NAXE, NDUFS6, NDUFS7, NDUFV1, OPA1, PARS2, PC, PDHA1, POLG, RARS2, RRM2B, SCO2, SERAC1, SLC19A3, SLC25A12, TAZ, TMEM126B, VARS2) were identified. The ACAD9, CLPB, FBXL4, PDHA1 genes recurred more than twice suggesting higher general/ethnic prevalence. In 19 cases, variants in 18 non-MD related genes (ADAR, CACNA1A, CDKL5, CLN3, CPS1, DMD, DYSF, GBE1, GFAP, HSD17B4, MECP2, MYBPC3, PEX5, PGAP2, PIGN, PRF1, SBDS, SCN2A) were found. The percentage of positive WES results rose gradually with increasing probability of MD according to the Mitochondrial Disease Criteria (MDC) scale (from 36 to 90 % for low and high probability, respectively). The percentage of detected MD-related genes compared with non MD-related genes also grew with the increasing MD likelihood (from 20 to 97 %). Molecular diagnosis was established in 30/47 (63.8 %) neonates and in 17/28 (60.7 %) patients with basal ganglia involvement. Mutations in CLPB, SERAC1, TAZ genes were identified in neonates with 3-methylglutaconic aciduria (3-MGA) as a discriminative feature. New MD-related candidate gene (NDUFB8) is under verification.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest WES rather than targeted NGS as the method of choice in diagnostics of MD in children, including neonates with 3-MGA aciduria, who died without determination of disease cause and with limited availability of laboratory data. There is a strong correlation between the degree of MD diagnosis by WES and MD likelihood expressed by the MDC scale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-methylglutaconic aciduria; Basal ganglia involvement; Candidate gene; Leigh syndrome; Mitochondrial disease criteria scale; Mitochondrial disorders; Neonates; Novel mutation; Whole-exome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27290639      PMCID: PMC4903158          DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0930-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med        ISSN: 1479-5876            Impact factor:   5.531


Background

The diagnostics of mitochondrial disorders (MD) remains a challenge due to clinical heterogeneity [1] and the constantly expanding amount of gene candidates [2] as well as new phenotypes of these conditions [3]. There are eight published studies evaluating diagnostic utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) in mitochondrial patient cohorts, selected either based on particular biochemical signatures of disease [4-8] or centre/cohort-based studies [9-11]. However, of these only four used whole exome sequencing (WES) [7-10]. A particular challenge is the diagnosis of MD in neonates below 3 months of age as these patients may account for up to 30 % of all MD cases [12, 13]. However, so far, this group has not been specifically focused on in terms of diagnostic effectiveness of WES. The prevailing majority (96.5 %) of cases with a molecular diagnosis of MD established at our national reference centre until 2013 included children older than 3 months, indicating considerable under-diagnosis rates in the youngest infants in the Polish population. We have achieved some improvement in neonatal MD detection by performing targeted DNA sequencing (frequently post mortem) in cases of neonates with lactic aciduria (LA-uria) found in selective GC–MS screening, including over 90 % of SCO2 [14] and DGUOK [15] deficiencies, and ~ 50 % of SURF1 deficiency [16]. The purpose of our study was to evaluate WES as a tool for diagnosis of MD depending on the disease probability assessed according to mitochondrial disease criteria (MDC) [17]. We considered both patients with full-range mitochondrial diagnostics (Leigh syndrome features in MRI and/or muscle biopsy evaluation) and those in whom only fragmentary clinical data e.g. abnormal result of GC–MS screening indicating the presence LA-uria and/or 3-methylglutaconic aciduria (3-MGA-uria) were available.

Methods

Patients

WES was performed in patients with probable or possible MD, in whom a molecular defect had not been identified within the analysed period. In the retrospective subgroup (88/113 patients) the lag time was 2–25 years (mean 7.5 +/5.9 years). Since 2013 WES has been considered in consecutive patients (25/113). To undergo WES, a patient had to fulfil at least one of the following criteria: 1/neonatal onset; 2/basal ganglia involvement (Leigh syndrome—LS, nonspecific basal ganglia involvement); 3/increased 3-MGA in urine (patients recruited from a group of >250 cases of 3-MGA aciduria identified by national selective GC–MS screening for metabolic disorders since 2000), and 4/genetic counselling demands. Access to biological material and informed consent of parents were sine qua non conditions for participation in the study. Details of criteria for patient selection and their clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1.
Table 1

Characteristics of 113 MD suspected patients; inclusion criteria

ID patientSexDate of birth (year)Neonatal onset3-MGA in urineBasal ganglia involvementDeathMDC scoreMuscle biopsyPeriod from onset to WES (year)
1F2009++55
2F2013++4Autopsy0
3M2012+5+2
4F20074+0
5F2013+++50
6F201140
7M2006+5+7
8M2008+20
9M2011+6+2
10M2004+5+7
11M200522
12M2005+3Autopsy7
13M2014+++4Autopsy0
14F2006+3+ Autopsy7
15F2008++4+5
16M2012+30
17F1992+3+21
18F2003+3+7
19M20095+3
20M200942
21F2006+6+8
22M2010++8+2
23M2011++4+3
24F2008+6+4
25M2010++7+3
26M2011++8+2
27M2008+++56
28M2004+++3+11
29F2007+5+7
30F2002++2+13
31F2005+6+9
32M2002++5Autopsy3
33F200632
34M2006+6+4
35M2012+6+2
36M2006++5+6
37M2003+++7+12
38M19853+12
39M19963+11
40M2010+++5Autopsy4
41F2011+4+3
42F201320
43M1967+210
44F195643
45F19952+11
46M20093+4
47M201320
48F200724
49M2012++6Autopsy2
50M2009++2Autopsy5
51M2003+++5+12
52F2011+53
53M20076+7
54M1990+6+25
55F19814+21
56F201240
57M2010+6+0
58M2012+6+0
59F2010+6+4
60M2003+++6+10
61M1989+8+23
62M1997++6+18
63F19894+16
64F2012++6+2
65M1991++4+23
66F2012+5+2
67F2014++40
68M2012+4+0
69M201330
70F2004+5+11
71M2001++5+14
72M2011++4Autopsy3
73F2002+3+11
74F19894+12
75M2008++5+6
76F2003+4+6
77F2011+++6+3
78M1994+317
79M20043+6
80F2012++20
81F1990++4+ Autopsy21
82F2000+32
83F2003++4+12
84M2010+3+4
85F2013++30
86M2008+25
87M201030
88M199720
89F2004+++4+11
90M2002+4+13
91M2009+6+5
92M1995+25
93M2011++3Autopsy3
94F2010++43
95F2011+4+3
96M2011+22
97M2005+ND4+10
98F2012+++2Autopsy2
99F197420
100M2009+3+5
101M2012+40
102F2006+30
103F2008+++3Autopsy4
104F1988+4+18
105F2014++50
106M2011+3+2
107M20064+8
108M2012+3+2
109M1997++4Autopsy18
110M20102+4
111F2014++40
112F2010++3Autopsy4
113M2013+4+0

F female, M male

Characteristics of 113 MD suspected patients; inclusion criteria F female, M male The study included cases with a high probability of MD and those in whom MD was considered possible. The level of probability was assessed according to the MDC score proposed by the Nijmegen mitochondrial team as follows: 2–4 points: MD possible; 5–8 points: MD probable [17]. The MDC scoring for this study did not include the results of muscle biopsy (panels A+B, without C). The mean MD score in the study group was 4.1 ± 1.5 (range 2–8). Muscle biopsy with subsequent OXPHOS evaluation was performed in 67 cases, and autopsy in 15 cases. The family history was positive in 26 cases and three couples were consanguineous. In the retrospective group, DNA was isolated from fibroblast cultures or frozen tissue samples obtained by muscle/liver biopsy or by autopsy. Whenever possible, skeletal muscle was preferred. In the remaining cases, DNA was isolated from blood. Throughout the paper the genes were classified as MD-related if they had a connection with mitochondrial disorders documented in the literature [9] or non MD-related when this was not the case. Parents of the patients gave informed consent for the WES analysis. The study protocol was in agreement with the Helsinki Convention and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Children’s Memorial Health Institute.

Whole-exome sequencing

WES was performed using TruSeqExome Enrichment Kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina). The samples were run on 1/4 of a lane on HiSeq 1500 using 2 × 100 bp paired-end reads. Bioinformatics analysis was performed as previously described [18]. Briefly, after initial processing with CASAVA, the sequencing reads were aligned to the hg19 reference genome with the Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Tool and further processed by Genome Analysis Toolkit [19]. Base quality score recalibration, indel realignment, duplicate removal, and SNP/INDEL calling were done as described [20]. The detected variants were annotated using Annovar and converted to MS Access format for final manual analyses. Alignments were viewed with Integrative Genomics Viewer [21, 22]. The complete results of WES, including VCF and/or FASTQ files, are available on demand to qualified researchers. All samples were sequenced so that min. 80 % of target was covered 20× or more. The presence of the variants identified by WES was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

Among 67 probands, we found 99 variants in 49 different genes with a Known disease link (Table 2). They were variants in mtDNA (6 patients) and nuclear DNA (nDNA): X-linked (9 patients), autosomal dominant (5 patients), and autosomal recessive (47 patients), including 11 homozygotes. In 50.5 % (50/99) the detected variants were novel (Table 3). Sixty-six of the variants found in the study group occurred in MD-related genes, whereas 31 were found in non MD-related loci. In addition, deleterious variants in a gene not previously linked to disease in humans were identified in one proband (Table 2).
Table 2

Molecular variants identified in 67 individuals of the study group

GeneChromosome:RefSeqVariant 1Variant 2Zygosity statusModeID patient
TypeStatusOriginTypeStatusOrigin
Mitochondrial disease gene
 ACAD9 chr3:NM_014049.4c.514G>A/p.Gly172ArgNovelmatc.803C>T/p.Ser268PheNovelpatcomphtzAR15
 ACAD9 chr3:NM_014049.4c.1552C>T/p.Arg518CysKnownmatc.1553G>A/p.Arg518HisKnownpatcomphtzAR23
 ACAD9 chr3:NM_014049.4c.728C>G/p.Thr243ArgNovelNDc.1552C>T/p.Arg518CysKnownmatcomphtzAR53
 ADCK3 chr1:NM_020247.4c.827A>G/p.Lys276ArgNovelmatc.1702delG/p.Gly568ArgfsNovelpatcomp htzAR61
 AIFM1 chrX:NM_004208.3c.1474T>C/p.Tyr492HisNovelmathemiXLR25
 CLPB chr11:NM_030813.4c.2045T>A/p.Ile682AsnKnownpatc.1937_1938insG/p.645Gly_646CysfsKnownmatcomphtzAR5
CLPB chr11:NM_030813.4c.1249C>T/p.Arg417a Knownpatc.748C>T/p.Arg250a KnownmatcomphtzAR27
 CLPB chr11:NM_030813.4c.1249C>T/p.Arg417a Knownpatc.1222A>G/p.Arg408GlyKnownmatcomphtzAR67
 COX10 chr17:NM_001303.3c.1030A>G/p.Met344ValNovelpatc.1270dupC/p.Leu424ProfsNovelmatcomphtzAR9
 COX10 chr17:NM_001303c.674C>T/p.Pro225LeuKnownmatc.674C>T/p.Pro225LeuKnownpathomAR36
 DLD chr7:NM_000108.4c.1123G>A/p.Glu375LysKnownmatc.1123G>A/p.Glu375LysKnown pathomAR31
 EARS2 chr16:NM_001083614.1c.164G>A/p.Arg55HisKnownmatc.325G>C/p.Gly109ArgNovelpatcomphtzAR7
 EARS2 chr16:NM_001083614.1c.164G>A/p.Arg55HisKnownpatc.1256C>T/p.Pro419LeuNovelmatcomphtzAR70
 FBXL4 chr6:NM_012160.4c.858+1G>T/p.?Novelpatc.585+5G>C/p.?NovelmatcomphtzAR3
 FBXL4 chr6:NM_012160.4c.1303C>T/p.Arg435a KnownNDc.64C>T/p.Arg22a NovelmatcomphtzAR52
 FBXL4 chr6:NM_012160.4c.64C>T/p.Arg22a Novelmatc.64C>T/p.Arg22a NovelpathomAR55
 MTATP6 chrM:NC_012920.1m.9185T>C/p.Leo220ProKnownmathomplM32
 MTFMT chr15:NM_139242.3c.994C>T/p.Arg332a KnownNDc.626C>T/p.Ser209LeuKnownNDcomphtzAR91
 MTND1 chrM:NC_012920.1m.3902_3908invACCTTGC/p.?Knownde novohetplM22
 MTND1 chrM:NC_012920.1m.3688G>A/p.Ala128ThrKnownNDhomplM64
 MTND3 chrM:NC_012920.1m.10254G>A/p.Asp66AsnKnownde novohetplM57
 MTND5 chrM:NC_012920.1m.12706T>C/p.Phe124LeuKnownde novohetplM34
 MTND5 chrM:NC_012920.1m.13513G>A/p.Asp393AsnKnownde novohetplM35
 NAXE chr1:NM_144772.2c.653A>T/p.Asp218ValKnownmatc.743_744delC/p.247Ala_248ThrfsKnownpat comphtzAR12
 NDUFS6 chr5:NM_004553.4c.313_315delAAAG/p.104Lys_106ThrfsNovelpatc.334_359del26ins13/p.Glu112 fsNovelmatcomphtzAR1
 NDUFS7 chr19:NM_024407.4c.376C>T/p.Leu126PheNovelNDc.504G>C/p.Arg168SerNovelNDhetAR75
 NDUFV1 chr11:NM_007103.3c.733G>A/p.Val245MetNovelpatc.383G>T/p.Arg128LeuNovelmatcomphtzAR10
 OPA1 chr3:NM_015560.2c.1146A>G/p.Ile382MetKnownmathtzAD33
 PARS2 chr1:NM_152268.3c.1091C>G/p.Pro364ArgNovelmatc.239T>C/p.Ile80ThrNovelpatcomphtzAR60
 PC chr11:NM_000920.3c.808C>T/p.Arg270TrpKnownpatc.2381_2383delTGG/p.Val794delNovelmatcomphtzAR29
 PC chr11:NM_000920.3c.1487G>A/p.Arg496GlnNovelNDc.584C>T/p.Ala195ValNovelNDcomphtzAR71
 PDHA1 chr X:NM_000284.3c.262C>T/p.Arg88CysKnownmathemiXLD19
 PDHA1 chrX:NM_000284.3c.856_859dupACTT/p. Arg288LeufsNovelde novohtzXLD56
 PDHA1 chrX:NM_000284.3c.933_935del/p.Arg311del lKnownde novohtzXLD66
 PDHA1 chrX:NM_000284.3c.291G>A/p.?Novelde novohemi, mosaicXLD68
 POLG chr15:NM_001126131.1c.2639C>A/p.Ala880AspNovelpatc.2243G>C/p.Trp748SerKnownmatcomphtzAR113
 RARS2 chr6:NM_020320.3c.1026G>A/p.Met342IleNovelmatc.622C>T/p.Gln208a NovelpatcomphtzAR41
 RRM2B chr8:NM_015713.4c.414_415delCA/p.Tyr138a Novelmatc.414_415delCA/p.Tyr138a  NovelNDhomAR21
 RRM2B chr8:NM_015713.4c.686G>T/p.Gly229ValKnownmatc.686G>T/p.Gly229ValKnownpathomAR51
 SCO2 chr22:NM_005138.2c.418G>A/p.Glu140LysKnownNDc.418G>A/p.Glu140LysKnownNDhomAR54
 SERAC1 chr6:NM_032861.3c.1822_1828+10delinsACCAACAGGKnownNDc.1822_1828+10delinsACCAACAGGKnownNDhomAR37
 SLC19A3 chr2:NM_025243.3c.68G>T/p.Gly23ValKnownPendingc.68G>T/p.Gly23ValKnown PendinghomAR58
 SLC19A3 chr2:NM_025243.3c.74dupT/p.Ser26LeufsKnownNDc.74dupT/p.Ser26LeufsKnown NDhomAR109
 SLC25A12 chr2:NM_003705.4c.1335C>A/p.Asn445LysNovelmatc.1335C>A/p.Asn445LysNovelpathomAR24
 TAZ chrX:NM_000116.3c.684_685insC/p.227Phe_228ProfsNovelNDhemiXLR28
 TMEM126B a chr11:NM_018480.4c.635G>T/p.Gly212ValKnownmatc.635G>T/p.Gly212ValKnown pathomAR59
 VARS2 chr6:NM_001167734.1.5c.1100C>T/p.Thr367IleKnownPendingc.1490G>A/p.Arg497HisNovelPendingcomphtzAR97
Non mitochondrial disease gene
 ADAR chr1:NM_001111.4c.3202+1G>A/p.?NovelNDc.577C>G/p.Pro193AlaKnownNDcomphtzAR18
 CACNA1A chr19:NM_001127221.1c.1997C>T/p.Thr666MetKnownmathtzAD39
 CDKL5 chrX:NM_003159.2c.1942C>T/p.Gln648a NovelmathemiXLD65
 CLN3 chr16:NM_001042432.1c.954_962+18del27/p.Leu313_Trp321delKnownpatc.461-280_677+382del966KnownPending comphtzAR88
 CPS1 chr2:NM_001875.4c.1837-8A>G/p.?Knownmatc.3691G>C/p.Ala1231ProNovelPaternalcomphtzAR13
 CPS1 chr2:NM_001875.4c.1289C>G/p.Ser430a Novelmatc.3971_3972delT/p.1323Ile_1324LeufsNovelpat comphtzAR40
 DMD chr X:NM_004006c.31+1G>A/p.?NovelmathemiXLR38
 DYSF chr2:NM_003494.3c.1180+5G>A/p.?KnownNDc.6124C>T/p.Arg2042CysKnownNDcomphtzAR45
 GBE1 chr3:NM_000158.3c.1621A>T/p.Asn541TyrNovelmatc.263G>A/p.Cys88TyrNovelpatcomphtzAR14
 GFAP chr17:NM_002055.4c.1100G>C/p.Arg367ThrNovelde novohtzAD42
 HSD17B4 chr5:NM_000414.3c.46G>A/p.Gly16SerKnownNDc.367C>T/p.His123TyrNovelNDcomphtzAR30
 MECP2 chrX:NM_004992.3c.89delA/p.Lys30ArgfsNovelde novohemiXLD106
 MYBPC3 chr11:NM_000256.3c.1351+1G>A/p.?KnownpathtzAD8
 PEX5 chr12:NM_001131025.1c.1669C>T/p.Arg557TrpKnownmatc.1799C>T/p.Ser600LeuNovelpatcomphtzAR20
 PGAP2 chr11:NM_001256240.1c.2T>G/p.Met1?Knownmatc.221G>A/p.Arg74HisKnownpatcomphtzAR73
 PIGN chr18:NM_176787.4c.932T>G/p.Leu311TrpKnownmatc.790G>A/p.Gly264ArgKnownpatcomphtzAR6
 PRF1 chr10:NM_001083116.1c.808_812delGGCAG/p.Gly270 fsNovelmatc.658G>A/p.Gly220SerKnownpatcomphtzAR2
 SBDS chr7:NM_016038.2c.258+2T>C/p.?Knownpatc.184A>T/p.Lys62a NovelmatcomphtzAR95
 SCN2A chr2:NM_021007.2c.2948T>G/p.Leu983TrpNovelde novohtzAD47
New candidate gene for mitochondrial disease
 NDUFB8 chr10:NM_005004.3c.432C>G/p.Cys144TrpNovelmatc.227C>A/p.Pro76GlnNovelpatcomphtzAR26

mat maternal, pat paternal, ND not determined (DNA not available), hom homozygote, htz heterozygote, comp htz compound heterozygote, hemi hemizygote, hompl homoplasmic, hetpl heteroplasmic, AR autosomal recessive inheritance, AD autosomal dominant inheritance, XLR X-linked recessive inheritance, XLD X-linked dominant inheritance, M mitochondrial inheritance

aData published on ESHG 2016 by Alston et al.

Table 3

Novel molecular variants identified in the study; pathogenicity status

GeneVariantMAFPathogenicity statusa Genotype–Phenotype correlationb Parental results statusFamily historyID patient
1000 GPOL 400
ACAD9 c.514G>A/p.Gly172Arg00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative15
ACAD9 c.803C>T/p.Ser268Phe00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative15
ACAD9 c.728C>G/p.Thr243Arg00PathogenicLowin-transNegative53
ADAR c.3202+1G>A/p.?00.0014PathogenicModerateNDAffected brother18
ADCK3 c.827A>G/p.Lys276Arg00PathogenicHighin-transNegative61
ADCK3 c.1702delG/p.Gly568Argfs00PathogenicHighin-transNegative61
AIFM1 c.1474T>C/p.Tyr492His00PathogenicModerateX-linkedNegative25
CDKL5 c.1942C>T/p.Gln648a 00PathogenicModerateX-linkedNegative65
COX10 c.1030A>G/p.Met344Val00.0007PathogenicModeratein-transNegative9
COX10 c.1270dupC/p.Leu424Profs00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative9
CPS1 c.3691G>C/p.Ala1231Pro00.0014PathogenicLowIn-transAffected sister13
CPS1 c.1289C>G/p.Ser430a 00.0014PathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother40
CPS1 c.3971_3972delT/p.1323Ile_1324Leufs00.0014PathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother40
DMD c.31+1G>A/p.?00PathogenicLowX-linkedAffected many males38
EARS2 c.325G>C/p.Gly109Arg00.0014Likely pathogenicHighin-transNegative7
EARS2 c.1256C>T/p.Pro419Leu00Likely pathogenicModeratein-transNegative70
FBXL4 c.858+1G>T/p.?00PathogenicHighin-transMiscarriage3
FBXL4 c.585+5G>C/p.?00PathogenicHighin-transMiscarriage3
FBXL4 c.64C>T/p.Arg22a 00PathogenicModeratein-transEmpty ovum52
FBXL4 c.64C>T/p.Arg22a 00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative55
GBE1 c.1621A>T/p.Asn541Tyr00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative14
GBE1 c.263G>A/p.Cys88Tyr00Possibly pathogenicModeratein-transNegative14
GFAP c.1100G>C/p.Arg367Thr00PathogenicModeratede novoNegative42
HSD17B4 c.367C>T/p.His123Tyr00.0014PathogenicModerateNDAffected brother30
MECP2 c.89delA/p.Lys30Argfs00.0PathogenicHighde novoNegative106
NDUFB8 c.432C>G/p.Cys144Trp00.0014Possibly pathogenicModeratein-transNegative26
NDUFB8 c.227C>A/p.Pro76Gln00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative26
NDUFS6 c.313_315delAAAG/p.104Lys_106Thrfs00PathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother1
NDUFS6 c.334_359del26ins13/p.Glu112 fs00PathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother1
NDUFS7 c.376C>T/p.Leu126Phe00PathogenicModerateNDSimilar symptoms in brother75
NDUFS7 c.504G>C/p.Arg168Ser00Likely PathogenicModerateNDSimilar symptoms in brother75
NDUFV1 c.733G>A/p.Val245Met0.00050PathogenicHighin-transNegative10
NDUFV1 c.383G>T/p.Arg128Leu00PathogenicHighin-transNegative10
PARS2 c.1091C>G/p.Pro364Arg0.00140.003PathogenicModeratein transAffected sibs60
PARS2 c.239T>C/p.Ile80Thr00PathogenicModeratein transAffected sibs60
PC c.2381_2383delTGG/p.Val794del00uncertain PathogenicHighin-transAffected brother29
PC c.1487G>A/p.Arg496Gln00PathogenicHighNDNegative71
PC c.584C>T/p.Ala195Val00PathogenicHighNDNegative71
PDHA1 c.856_859dupACTT/p. Arg288Leufs00PathogenicHighde novoNegative56
PDHA1 c.291G>A/p.?00.0000Uncertain pathogenicModeratede novoNegative68
PEX5 c.1799C>T/p.Ser600Leu00PathogenicLowin-transNegative20
POLG c.2639C>A/p.Ala880Asp00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative113
PRF1 c.808_812delGGCAG/p.Gly270 fs00.0000PathogenicLowin transNegative2
RARS2 c.1026G>A/p.Met342Ile00Likely pathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother41
RARS2 c.622C>T/p.Gln208a 00.0014PathogenicModeratein-transAffected brother41
RRM2B c.414_415delCA/p.Tyr138a 00.0014PathogenicHighNDNegative21
SBDS c.184A>T/p.Lys62a 00.002PathogenicLowin-transPI neural tube defect95
SCN2A c.2948T>G/p.Leu983Trp00.0013PathogenicHighde novoNegative47
SLC25A12 c.1335C>A/p.Asn445Lys00PathogenicModeratein-transNegative24
TAZ c.684_685insC/p.227Phe_228Profs00.0012PathogenicLowNDNegative28
VARS2 c.1490G>A/p.Arg497His00PathogenicLowNDSimilar disease in sibs97

ND not determined due to lack of clinical data or DNA not available

aPathogenicity status evaluated according to in silico prediction algorithms (CADD, MetaSVM, Polyphen2 HDIV, Polyphen HVAR, mutation assessor, LRT, MetaLR, SIFT, mutationtaster) and classified as: pathogenic—nonsense, frameshift, splicesite and missense variants with pathogenic status at least in 7 of used algorithms; likely pathogenic - missense variants with pathogenic status in 4–6 of used algorithms; possibly pathogenic—missense variants with pathogenic status <4 of used algorithms

bGenotype-Phenotypecorrelationassessed by two independent specialists in clinical genetics and metabolic medicine

Molecular variants identified in 67 individuals of the study group mat maternal, pat paternal, ND not determined (DNA not available), hom homozygote, htz heterozygote, comp htz compound heterozygote, hemi hemizygote, hompl homoplasmic, hetpl heteroplasmic, AR autosomal recessive inheritance, AD autosomal dominant inheritance, XLR X-linked recessive inheritance, XLD X-linked dominant inheritance, M mitochondrial inheritance aData published on ESHG 2016 by Alston et al. Novel molecular variants identified in the study; pathogenicity status ND not determined due to lack of clinical data or DNA not available aPathogenicity status evaluated according to in silico prediction algorithms (CADD, MetaSVM, Polyphen2 HDIV, Polyphen HVAR, mutation assessor, LRT, MetaLR, SIFT, mutationtaster) and classified as: pathogenic—nonsense, frameshift, splicesite and missense variants with pathogenic status at least in 7 of used algorithms; likely pathogenic - missense variants with pathogenic status in 4–6 of used algorithms; possibly pathogenic—missense variants with pathogenic status <4 of used algorithms bGenotype-Phenotypecorrelationassessed by two independent specialists in clinical genetics and metabolic medicine Mutations in MD-related genes were found in 47 probands. Identified pathogenic variants in 31 different genes included 27 located in nDNA and 4 in mtDNA (Table 2). Eleven genes were found defective more than once (PDHA1-4x, ACAD9, CLPB, and FBXL4-3x, COX10, EARS2, MTND1, MTND5, PC, RRM2B, SLC19A3-2x). The majority of these genes were not previously screened for in our mitochondrial diagnostic centre, with the exceptions of TAZ, PDHA1 [23], SCO2, and the genes encoding MTND and MTATP subunits. Below we present the results that were analysed according to selected phenotypic features (neonatal onset, basal ganglia involvement, 3-MGA) and MD likelihood.

Subgroup of neonates

WES yielded conclusive results in 63.9 % (30/47) of neonates studied (Fig. 1a). We found mutations in 23 different genes, including 16 MD-related (ACAD9, AIFM1, CLPB, FBXL4, NDUFS6, NDUFS7, PARS2, PC, PDHA1 [23], RRM2B, SERAC1, SLC19A3, SLC25A12, TAZ, TMEM126B, VARS2) and 7 non MD-related (CDKL5, CPS1, HSD17B4, MECP2, PGAP2, PRF1, SBDS). The majority of the neonates with positive WES results came from the first pregnancy of healthy unrelated parents. Twenty-nine neonates died before establishing a diagnosis; half in the early neonatal period. In 28 cases the mitochondrial testing was completed, including MR imaging and spectroscopy, muscle biopsy and fibroblast culture collection. In the remaining cases, mitochondrial diagnostics were absent or limited only to selective GC–MS screening showing increased excretion of lactate, Krebs cycle metabolites, 3-MGA and/or ketone bodies.
Fig. 1

The percentage of detected MD-related genes, non MD-related genes and non-conclusive WES results in (a) neonates (n = 47), b patients with 3-MGA-uria (n = 16) and c patients with basal ganglia involvement (n = 28)

The percentage of detected MD-related genes, non MD-related genes and non-conclusive WES results in (a) neonates (n = 47), b patients with 3-MGA-uria (n = 16) and c patients with basal ganglia involvement (n = 28)

Subgroup with 3-methylglutaonic aciduria

Positive WES results were obtained in seven of 16 patients with persisting 3-MGA (Fig. 1b). In two subjects [P28 and P37] we found mutations in TAZ and SERAC1 genes known to cause mitochondrial diseases with 3-MGA as a discriminative feature [24]. Ex post it was apparent that earlier some important clinical features, including hearing impairment in the patient with SERAC1 mutations and increased excretion of 3-MGA in the terminal stage in the boy with the TAZ mutation, had been overlooked. In three unrelated 3-MGA neonates included in this study, we identified mutations in the CLPB gene, whose link to human disease was subsequently established [25]. Two of them [P5 and P27] have already been reported in the first disease description [25]. Additionally, in two 3-MGA patients [P13, P40] we found molecular variants in the CPS1, a non MD-related gene linked to urea cycle disorder. In remaining patients in whom the reason for inclusion in the study group was a single GC–MS assessment (ACAD9 and MYBPC3 patients [P15, P8]), increased excretion of 3-MGA has been apparently transient or it was within normal limits after quantitative verification (Additional file 1: Table S1). Since traces of 3-MGA excretion were also found in a number of healthy siblings and parents of the patients the transient or mild increase in patients was most likely without a causal relationship.

Basal ganglia involvement (Leigh syndrome, Leigh-like, others)

In 15 of 28 patients from this group (Fig. 1c), molecular variants in LS-associated genes, including genes responsible for deficiency of complex I (MTND1, MTND3, MTND5, NDUFV1), complex IV (COX10), complex V (MTATP6), combined OXPHOS defect (EARS2, PARS2, RARS2, RRM2B, SERAC1, SLC19A3), and pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency (DLD, PDHA1) [23] were identified. In the remaining 13 patients with LS or other basal ganglia involvement WES did not reveal variants in MD-related genes as listed by Neveling [9]. In three patients with basal ganglia involvement one MD-related candidate (NDUFB8) and two known non MD-related genes (ADAR, CDKL5) were identified.

Defects in non MD-related genes

In 19 patients who were included in the study because of a possible (low probability) mitochondrial disease, mutations in various non MD-related genes (ADAR, CACNA1A, CDKL5, CLN3, CPS1, DMD, DYSF, GBE1, GFAP, HSD17B4, MECP2, MYBPC3, PEX5, PGAP2, PIGN, PRF1, SBDS, SCN2A) were identified (Table 2; Additional file 1: Table S1).

New MD-related disorders

While our project was ongoing new candidate genes found by us including PARS2 [26] and CLPB have been described by other research teams [25]. The causal role of another two of our candidates has been recognized even more recently. The NAXE gene (APOA1BP according to old nomenclature), a susceptibility locus for migraine [27], in which likely pathogenic variants were found by us in two brothers with a fatal encephalitis-like disorder [P12], has been described in April 2016 as the cause of lethal infantile leukoencephalopathy in a large consanguineous family [28]. A homozygous variant in the TMEM126B gene encoding a subunit required for mitochondrial complex I assembly [29, 30], found by us in a complex I deficient girl with extra-neurological presentation [P59], has been discovered and verified functionally as a cause of the disease in a subset of other patients (ESHG 2016, Alston et al.). The interesting remaining candidate for a novel disease gene identified in our study is NDUFB8. Compound heterozygosity for two variants in NDUFB8 was found in a boy with a typical course of LS and complex I deficiency in muscle homogenate [P26] (Additional file 1: Table S1). NDUFB8 [31] encodes a known subunit of complex I, but, to the extent of our knowledge, its association with complex I deficiency and LS in humans has not been published so far.

Mitochondrial disease criteria score

In the studied cohort there were 40 patients with high probability of MD, i.e., with an MDC score above 4 (5–8, criteria A+B, without C). Positive WES results were obtained in 36 of them (90 %). In this group, pathogenic variants were found mainly in MD-related genes (CPS1 being the exception). WES failed in four patients [P49, P62, P77, P105] with an MDC score above 4. Some of them were found to carry a deleterious variant in one of the known MD-related genes only on one allele. The definite diagnosis still remains open in these cases. Bioinformatics tools for identification of structural variants using NGS have not been applied to our data so it is possible that in some cases the disease may be caused by large deletions/duplications. The complete lists of variants detected in the subjects without fully conclusive results and/or the respective FASTQ files are available on demand to qualified researchers. Intermediate probability of MD (MDC = 4) was associated with the occurrence of variants in both MD-related and non MD-related genes, in ten (10/31) and six (6/31) patients, respectively. MD-related genes were represented in this subset twice by ACAD9 [P15, P23] and PDHA1 [P56, P68], and in single cases by CLPB [P67], FBLX4 [P55], POLG [P113], RARS2 [P41], SLC19A3 [P109], and VARS2 [P97]. In the subgroup with low probability of MD, i.e., a MDC score of 2–3 points, positive WES results were obtained in 15 of 42 cases (36 %). Three MD-related genes (7 %) including: OPA1 [P33], TAZ [P28] and NAXE [P12] were found. Non MD-related genes were identified in 12 of 42 cases (29 %). The percentage of positive results rose gradually as the likelihood of MD increased, as shown by the MDC score (Fig. 2). In the subset of high probability of MD (MDC above 4), the detection percentage reached 90 %. There was a broad range of MD-related genes (Table 2). Only one non MD-related gene (CPS1) was found in a neonate with a MDC score of 5.
Fig. 2

Efficacy of WES in 113 patients with possible or probable mitochondrial pathology depending on the level of probability expressed by MDC Nijmegen score

Efficacy of WES in 113 patients with possible or probable mitochondrial pathology depending on the level of probability expressed by MDC Nijmegen score The participation of detected MD-related genes as compared with non MD-related genes also grew as the likelihood of MD probability increased (from 20 to 97 %, data not shown).

WES diagnostics of current cases vs. archival DNA samples

Characteristics of the patients stratified by the waiting period between disease onset and WES qualification into archival material and current diagnostics subset is shown in Table 4. WES efficacy assessed as percentage of molecularly confirmed diagnoses was comparable being higher than 50 % in both subsets. Contribution of MD-related genes expressed by the ratio of MD-related/non MD-related genes was higher in the archival than current subset (3.4 vs. 1.0, respectively) indicating that this subset contained more patients with non-mitochondrial genetic disorders and that our current qualification for WES became less demanding.
Table 4

WES results related to the origin of the qualified material and to the specific inclusion criteria

Subgroups of patientsMD or non-MD genes loci of variantsDiagnostics based on archival materialCurrent diagnosticsTotal
Disease onset (year)1996–20122013–20141996–2014
Number of patients88 (5.5/year)25 (12.5/year)113
Period from onset to WES qualification (years)2–25 (mean 5.5 ± 5.9 )00–25
MDC scale (A+B, without C)4.2 ± 1.5 (2–8)3.6 ± 1.2 (2–6)4.1 ± 1.5
Ratio of MD-related/non MD related genes3.41.02.4
Patients deceasedTotal no.41844 %
MD 51.2 % (21) 2 47 % (23)
non MD (3) 2 (5)
Patients with neonatal onsetTotal no.41642 %
MD 53.7 % (22) 2 51 % (24)
non MD (5) 2 (7)
Patients with LS or other basal ganglia involvementTotal no.21725 %
MD 61.9 % (13) 3 57 % (16)
non MD (2) 0 (2)
3-methylglutaconic aciduriaTotal no.13314 %
MD 53.8 % (7) 2 53 % (9)
non MD 0 1 (1)
Muscle biopsyTotal no.62567/113
MD 56.4 % (35) (4) 58 % (39)
non MD (10) (0) (10)
Percentage of muscle biopsy70 %20 %59 %

aItalics in brackets indicates the number of patients in the given subset

LS Leigh syndrome, MD mitochondrial disorder, MD/non MD MD-related/non MD-related genes wherein variants were identified

WES results related to the origin of the qualified material and to the specific inclusion criteria aItalics in brackets indicates the number of patients in the given subset LS Leigh syndrome, MD mitochondrial disorder, MD/non MD MD-related/non MD-related genes wherein variants were identified

Muscle biopsy findings

OXPHOS assessment available for 67 muscle homogenates showed isolated complex I deficiency in 16 cases, complex IV deficiency in 6 cases and combined OXPHOS defect in 10 cases. There were unspecific changes in 22 bioptates and normal OXPHOS activity in 10. The results were not conclusive in three cases due to technical problems (too small muscle specimen, low protein concentration, low citric synthase activity). Complex I deficiency was found in 11 patients with molecular variants in MD-related genes (ACAD9 [P15, P23, P53], NDUFV1 [P10], NDUFS7 [P75], MTND1 [P64], MTND3 [P57], EARS2 [P7], SLC19A3 [P58], TMEM126B [P59]) and in one candidate (NDUFB8 [P26]. In one patient [P95] a defect in non MD-related gene (SBDS) was found. In 4 patients WES results were not conclusive. In the subset with complex IV deficiency molecular defects were confirmed in three patients including COX10 [P9, P36] and EARS2 [P70]) while three WES analyses were not conclusive. Combined OXPHOS defect occurred in 8 patients with variants identified in MD-related genes (FBXL4 [P3], ADCK3 [P61], RRM2B [P21, P51], AIFM1 [P25], TAZ [P28], PC [P71], MTND5 [P34]). In two cases WES results were not conclusive. Histological and histochemical data of the patients with positive WES showed presence of ragged red fibers in four cases (ADCK3 [P61], ACAD9 [P15, P23, P53]), “lipid storage myopathy” in four (PC [P71, P29], MTND5 [P35], PDHA1 [P66]) and SMA-like pattern in three (AIFM1 [P25], SCO2 [P54], RRM2B [P51]). Depletion of mitochondrial DNA (<30 % of reference value) was revealed in tissues of 8 patients. Molecular defect was established by WES in four of them (COX10 [P9], FBXL4 [3], RRM2B [P21, P51]).

Verification of mitochondrial genome variants

Interestingly, in six patients with typical MD phenotype the search for pathogenic variants in MD-related nuclear genes by WES was negative yet pathogenic variants were found in mtDNA. Each mtDNA variant identified by WES, was subsequently verified by Sanger sequencing using specific primers for mitochondrial genome. All detected changes are known and have been repeatedly reported. Examination of different tissues in probands and maternally related family members showed varying levels of heteroplasmy (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Family study in six probands with mtDNA known mutations

Family study in six probands with mtDNA known mutations

Discussion

Our results confirm that the implementation of WES led to a significant breakthrough in the diagnostics of MD in children [32]. This is expressed by both the increased number of identified genes and faster establishment of final diagnosis. The total number of genes with likely causative defects found in the present work was 47, a very satisfactory diagnostic yield when compared with 8 genes identified by us by single-gene Sanger sequencing before the introduction of WES (203 such diagnoses per ~1200 patients studied in the period from 1996 to 2013). In our study we observed a pronounced upward trend in the detection of the molecular background of mitochondrial diseases that was associated with increased MD probability (Fig. 2). According to the MDC scale that we used, a final genetic diagnosis was achieved in over 90 % of patients with the highest MDC scores (5–8 points). In all such cases (with one exception for a neonate with CPS1 mutation), variants were found exclusively in MD-related genes. The diagnostic yield was the lowest (36 %) in the patients with low MD suspicion (MDC score 2–3), and most of the variants in this group were present in non MD-related genes. A similar correlation between detection rate and the level of MD probability was described recently in a similar patient group studied by WES at the Nijmegen Mitochondrial Centre [10]. However, our results differed from that study in terms of the scope of detected defects. In our cohort, mutations in MTO1, TK2, C12orf65, COA6, TUFM, GFM1 were absent and the defects in nuclear encoded complex I subunits are different. This may be a result of random patient selection, but we should also take into account ethnic differences among European populations, e.g., the Slavonic vs. north-western European populations. In addition, we identified six rare mtDNA pathogenic variants, not included in the common mutations screening i.e. m.9185T>C in MTATP6 [33-35] and in mitochondrial DNA genes encoding complex I subunits, MTND1 [36-38], MTND3 and MTND5 [39-42]. One-third (15/47) of the identified gene defects were discovered during last 10 years and relatively poorly characterized in terms of phenotype. These included PGAP2 [43, 44], ACAD9 [45, 46], EARS2 [47], SERAC1 [48], SLC19A3 [49, 50], MTFMT [51], SLC25A12 [52] as well as VARS2 [53], AIFM1 [54], RARS2 [55], RRM2B [56], PIGN [44, 57], ADCK3 [58, 59] which were described in just individual cases. Notably, most of these genes are generally absent from commercial NGS panels available at present. It is worth emphasizing that in some cases WES allowed for a diagnosis in statu nascendi, that is, at the time of the first publication of the new gene. This concerned, for example, mutations in CLPB [25, 60], PARS2 [26], FBXL4 [61, 62] and recently added TMEM126B (data published on ESHG 2016 by Alston et al.), and NAXE [28] In one of the patients with the MD phenotype we identified potentially pathogenic variants in candidate NDUFB8 which role in human pathology is under verification [Piekutowska-Abramczuk et al. submitted to SSIEM 2016]. According to published literature, every third paediatric MD case (approximately 30 % of all MD diagnoses in this age group) manifests clinically shortly after birth [12, 13]. The fatal outcome in such cases precludes transport to a reference centre and proper mitochondrial diagnostics. We have previously shown significantly reduced (up to ten times, about 3 % of all diagnoses) recognition of MD in this age group in Poland [16]. Therefore, neonates with suspected MD intentionally constituted a significant proportion of patients (47/113) undergoing WES in the present study. Surprisingly, in the neonatal subgroup WES proved to be particularly useful, allowing identification of pathogenic variants in 24 various genes in 63.8 % of patients, including those without muscle biopsy or even autopsy. Our results extend the list recommended by Honzik [13] for neonatal MD diagnostics by at least 15 genes (MD-related: RRM2B, CLPB, ACAD9, FBXL4, PC, AIFM1, SLC25A12, MTND5, NDUFS6 and non MD-related: CPS1, PGAP2 and more). In the LS subgroup WES expanded the set of patients from our centre diagnosed with complex I deficiency by three known genes: NDUFS6 [63, 64], NDUFV1 [65, 66], NDUFS7 [67], a new candidate NDUFB8 [68] and five MTNDs mentioned above. Despite this, complex I deficiency continues to be underrepresented in our cohort in relation to complex IV deficiency because of the high carriage rate of SURF1 mutations in Poland [69]. In a number of cases with basal ganglia brain changes, WES failed to show mutations in known LS-associated genes. This was especially the case in patients without lactic acidaemia and MDC scores below 5 (MD possible but not likely). We speculate that other, still unknown, genes or non-genetic factors might influence the occurrence of LS-brain changes. Taken together, our results indicate that WES rather than targeted NGS should be the method of choice for MD testing, at least until all MD-associated genes are identified. Furthermore, the rationale for choosing WES in MD-suspected neonates is the non-specificity of symptoms and overlapping results of biochemical tests with non-mitochondrial errors of metabolism. In 50.5 % the molecular variants were novel (Table 3). However, a number of recurrent rare pathogenic variants found in some recently discovered MD genes (p.Arg22* in FBLX4, p.Arg518Cys in ACAD9, p.Arg417* in CLPB and c.1822_1828+10delinsACCAACAGG in SERAC1) may extend the ethnic specificity of MD in the Polish population reported earlier by us for variants p.Glu140Lys in SCO2 [14] and c.845_846delCT in SURF1 genes [69]. Confirmation of these findings could facilitate in-house diagnostics in selected suspected cases.

Conclusions

In a nationwide reference centre, WES provided positive results in >90 % of children with high likelihood of MD (MDC score above 4); WES should be recommended for diagnostics of mitochondrial pathology considering remarkable representation of non MD-related genes among causal factors in patients with lower likelihood of MD, as well as a possibility to discover new mitochondrial genes; WES significantly improves recognition of MD in newborns, even in the case of limited availability of appropriate diagnostic procedures; Despite being a sine qua non for certain diagnoses 3-MGA is not a universal marker of mitochondrial dysfunction; Recurrent variants recognized in some relatively new MD genes (FBLX4, ACAD9, and CLPB) may extend the known ethnic specificity of MD in the Polish population reported earlier for SCO2 and SURF1 variants.
  68 in total

1.  Molecular diagnosis of infantile mitochondrial disease with targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Sarah E Calvo; Alison G Compton; Steven G Hershman; Sze Chern Lim; Daniel S Lieber; Elena J Tucker; Adrienne Laskowski; Caterina Garone; Shangtao Liu; David B Jaffe; John Christodoulou; Janice M Fletcher; Damien L Bruno; Jack Goldblatt; Salvatore Dimauro; David R Thorburn; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  A post-hoc comparison of the utility of sanger sequencing and exome sequencing for the diagnosis of heterogeneous diseases.

Authors:  Kornelia Neveling; Ilse Feenstra; Christian Gilissen; Lies H Hoefsloot; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Richard J T Rodenburg; Helger G Yntema; Liesbeth Spruijt; Sascha Vermeer; Tuula Rinne; Koen L van Gassen; Danielle Bodmer; Dorien Lugtenberg; Rick de Reuver; Wendy Buijsman; Ronny C Derks; Nienke Wieskamp; Bert van den Heuvel; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Hannie Kremer; David A Koolen; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Frans P M Cremers; Carlo L M Marcelis; Jan A M Smeitink; Saskia B Wortmann; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Joris A Veltman; Han G Brunner; Hans Scheffer; Marcel R Nelen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  CLPB variants associated with autosomal-recessive mitochondrial disorder with cataract, neutropenia, epilepsy, and methylglutaconic aciduria.

Authors:  Carol Saunders; Laurie Smith; Flemming Wibrand; Kirstine Ravn; Peter Bross; Isabelle Thiffault; Mette Christensen; Andrea Atherton; Emily Farrow; Neil Miller; Stephen F Kingsmore; Elsebet Ostergaard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Does p.Q247X in TRIM63 cause human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Rafal Ploski; Agnieszka Pollak; Sonja Müller; Maria Franaszczyk; Ewa Michalak; Joanna Kosinska; Piotr Stawinski; Mateusz Spiewak; Hubert Seggewiss; Zofia T Bilinska
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Mutation of RRM2B, encoding p53-controlled ribonucleotide reductase (p53R2), causes severe mitochondrial DNA depletion.

Authors:  Alice Bourdon; Limor Minai; Valérie Serre; Jean-Philippe Jais; Emmanuelle Sarzi; Sophie Aubert; Dominique Chrétien; Pascale de Lonlay; Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger; Hirofumi Arakawa; Yusuke Nakamura; Arnold Munnich; Agnès Rötig
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Sporadic intragenic inversion of the mitochondrial DNA MTND1 gene causing fatal infantile lactic acidosis.

Authors:  Emma L Blakely; Katherine J Rennie; Linda Jones; Mattias Elstner; Zofia M A Chrzanowska-Lightowlers; Christopher B White; Julian P H Shield; Daniela T Pilz; Douglass M Turnbull; Joanna Poulton; Robert W Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  AGC1 deficiency associated with global cerebral hypomyelination.

Authors:  Rolf Wibom; Francesco M Lasorsa; Virpi Töhönen; Michela Barbaro; Fredrik H Sterky; Thomas Kucinski; Karin Naess; Monica Jonsson; Ciro L Pierri; Ferdinando Palmieri; Anna Wedell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  CABC1 gene mutations cause ubiquinone deficiency with cerebellar ataxia and seizures.

Authors:  Julie Mollet; Agnès Delahodde; Valérie Serre; Dominique Chretien; Dimitri Schlemmer; Anne Lombes; Nathalie Boddaert; Isabelle Desguerre; Pascale de Lonlay; Hélène Ogier de Baulny; Arnold Munnich; Agnès Rötig
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Mutations in FBXL4 cause mitochondrial encephalopathy and a disorder of mitochondrial DNA maintenance.

Authors:  Penelope E Bonnen; John W Yarham; Arnaud Besse; Ping Wu; Eissa A Faqeih; Ali Mohammad Al-Asmari; Mohammad A M Saleh; Wafaa Eyaid; Alrukban Hadeel; Langping He; Frances Smith; Shu Yau; Eve M Simcox; Satomi Miwa; Taraka Donti; Khaled K Abu-Amero; Lee-Jun Wong; William J Craigen; Brett H Graham; Kenneth L Scott; Robert McFarland; Robert W Taylor
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Assembly factors for the membrane arm of human complex I.

Authors:  Byron Andrews; Joe Carroll; Shujing Ding; Ian M Fearnley; John E Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  75 in total

1.  Primary Coenzyme Q deficiency Due to Novel ADCK3 Variants, Studies in Fibroblasts and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Adel Shalata; Michael Edery; Clair Habib; Jacob Genizi; Mohammad Mahroum; Lama Khalaily; Nurit Assaf; Idan Segal; Hoda Abed El Rahim; Hana Shapira; Danielle Urian; Shay Tzur; Liza Douiev; Ann Saada
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  NDUFS6 related Leigh syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Cécile Rouzier; Annabelle Chaussenot; Konstantina Fragaki; Valérie Serre; Samira Ait-El-Mkadem; Christian Richelme; Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger; Sylvie Bannwarth
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  NDUFB8 Mutations Cause Mitochondrial Complex I Deficiency in Individuals with Leigh-like Encephalomyopathy.

Authors:  Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk; Zahra Assouline; Lavinija Mataković; René G Feichtinger; Eliška Koňařiková; Elżbieta Jurkiewicz; Piotr Stawiński; Mirjana Gusic; Andreas Koller; Agnieszka Pollak; Piotr Gasperowicz; Joanna Trubicka; Elżbieta Ciara; Katarzyna Iwanicka-Pronicka; Dariusz Rokicki; Sylvain Hanein; Saskia B Wortmann; Wolfgang Sperl; Agnès Rötig; Holger Prokisch; Ewa Pronicka; Rafał Płoski; Giulia Barcia; Johannes A Mayr
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Mitochondrial energy generation disorders: genes, mechanisms, and clues to pathology.

Authors:  Ann E Frazier; David R Thorburn; Alison G Compton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A missense allele of PEX5 is responsible for the defective import of PTS2 cargo proteins into peroxisomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali; Shahid Y Khan; Tony A Rodrigues; Tânia Francisco; Xiaodong Jiao; Hang Qi; Firoz Kabir; Bushra Irum; Bushra Rauf; Asma A Khan; Azra Mehmood; Muhammad Asif Naeem; Muhammad Zaman Assir; Muhammad Hassaan Ali; Mohsin Shahzad; Khaled K Abu-Amero; Shehla Javed Akram; Javed Akram; Sheikh Riazuddin; Saima Riazuddin; Michael L Robinson; Myriam Baes; Jorge E Azevedo; J Fielding Hejtmancik; S Amer Riazuddin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  The utility of phenomics in diagnosis of inherited metabolic disorders.

Authors:  Joyeeta Rahman; Shamima Rahman
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.659

7.  Identification of extremely rare mitochondrial disorders by whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Go Hun Seo; Arum Oh; Eun Na Kim; Yeonmi Lee; Jumi Park; Taeho Kim; Young-Min Lim; Gu-Hwan Kim; Chong Jai Kim; Han-Wook Yoo; Eunju Kang; Beom Hee Lee
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  The nuclear background influences the penetrance of the near-homoplasmic m.1630 A > G MELAS variant in a symptomatic proband and asymptomatic mother.

Authors:  Martine Uittenbogaard; Hao Wang; Victor Wei Zhang; Lee-Jun Wong; Christine A Brantner; Andrea Gropman; Anne Chiaramello
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.797

9.  Novel NAXE variants as a cause for neurometabolic disorder: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Joanne Trinh; Sophie Imhoff; Marija Dulovic-Mahlow; Krishna Kumar Kandaswamy; Vera Tadic; Jochen Schäfer; Valerija Dobricic; Achim Nolte; Martin Werber; Arndt Rolfs; Alexander Münchau; Christine Klein; Katja Lohmann; Norbert Brüggemann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Neonatal encephalocardiomyopathy caused by mutations in VARS2.

Authors:  Fabian Baertling; Bader Alhaddad; Annette Seibt; Sonja Budaeus; Thomas Meitinger; Tim M Strom; Ertan Mayatepek; Jörg Schaper; Holger Prokisch; Tobias B Haack; Felix Distelmaier
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.