| Literature DB >> 27289422 |
Eva Rosa1, Manuel Perea2, Peter Enneson3.
Abstract
Do all visual features in a word's constituent letters have the same importance during lexical access? Here we examined whether some components of a word's letters (midsegments, junctions, terminals) are more important than others. To that end, we conducted two lexical decision experiments using a delayed segment technique with lowercase stimuli. In this technique a partial preview appears for 50ms and is immediately followed by the target item. In Experiment 1, the partial preview was composed of terminals+junctions, midsegments+junctions, or midsegments+terminals - a whole preview condition was used as a control. Results only revealed an advantage of the whole preview condition over the other three conditions. In Experiment 2, the partial preview was composed of the whole word except for the deletion of midsegments, junctions, or terminals - we again employed a whole preview condition as a control. Results showed the following pattern in the latency data: whole preview=delay of terminals<delay of junctions<delay of midsegments. Thus, some components of a word's constituent letters are more critical for word identification than others. We examine how the present findings help adjust current models of visual word identification or develop new ones.Keywords: Letter processing; Lexical decision; Priming; Visual-word recognition
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27289422 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Psychol (Amst) ISSN: 0001-6918