Literature DB >> 27289420

Hybridization-Induced Aggregation Technology for Practical Clinical Testing: KRAS Mutation Detection in Lung and Colorectal Tumors.

Hillary S Sloane1, James P Landers2, Kimberly A Kelly3.   

Abstract

KRAS mutations have emerged as powerful predictors of response to targeted therapies in the treatment of lung and colorectal cancers; thus, prospective KRAS genotyping is essential for appropriate treatment stratification. Conventional mutation testing technologies are not ideal for routine clinical screening, as they often involve complex, time-consuming processes and/or costly instrumentation. In response, we recently introduced a unique analytical strategy for revealing KRAS mutations, based on the allele-specific hybridization-induced aggregation (HIA) of oligonucleotide probe-conjugated microbeads. Using simple, inexpensive instrumentation, this approach allows for the detection of any common KRAS mutation in <10 minutes after PCR. Here, we evaluate the clinical utility of the HIA method for mutation detection (HIAMD). In the analysis of 20 lung and colon tumor pathology specimens, we observed a 100% correlation between the KRAS mutation statuses determined by HIAMD and sequencing. In addition, we were able to detect KRAS mutations in a background of 75% wild-type DNA-a finding consistent with that reported for sequencing. With this, we show that HIAMD allows for the rapid and cost-effective detection of KRAS mutations, without compromising analytical performance. These results indicate the validity of HIAMD as a mutation-testing technology suitable for practical clinical testing. Further expansion of this platform may involve the detection of mutations in other key oncogenic pathways.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27289420      PMCID: PMC4929403          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  33 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Helena Linardou; Issa J Dahabreh; Dimitra Kanaloupiti; Fotios Siannis; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Paris Kosmidis; Christos A Papadimitriou; Samuel Murray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Methods for detection of point mutations: performance and quality assessment. IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Molecular Biology Techniques.

Authors:  P Nollau; C Wagener
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  High-resolution melting analysis as a sensitive prescreening diagnostic tool to detect KRAS , BRAF , PIK3CA , and AKT1 mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Jasmin Teresa Ney; Stefanie Froehner; Angelika Roesler; Reinhard Buettner; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Takako Kawasaki; Mohan Brahmandam; Liying Yan; Mami Cantor; Chungdak Namgyal; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Optimized allele-specific real-time PCR assays for the detection of common mutations in KRAS and BRAF.

Authors:  Alois H Lang; Heinz Drexel; Simone Geller-Rhomberg; Nicole Stark; Thomas Winder; Kathrin Geiger; Axel Muendlein
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetic screening for drug therapy: from single gene markers to decision making in the next generation sequencing era.

Authors:  Mladen Tzvetkov; Nicolas von Ahsen
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.306

7.  A comparison of Direct sequencing, Pyrosequencing, High resolution melting analysis, TheraScreen DxS, and the K-ras StripAssay for detecting KRAS mutations in non small cell lung carcinomas.

Authors:  Sylwia Jancik; Jiri Drabek; Jitka Berkovcova; Yong Zhong Xu; Marcela Stankova; Jiri Klein; Vitezslav Kolek; Josef Skarda; Tomas Tichy; Ivona Grygarkova; Danuta Radzioch; Marian Hajduch
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20

8.  A comparison of three methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  D Gonzalez de Castro; B Angulo; B Gomez; D Mair; R Martinez; A Suarez-Gauthier; F Shieh; M Velez; V H Brophy; H J Lawrence; F Lopez-Rios
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Optical Imaging of Paramagnetic Bead-DNA Aggregation Inhibition Allows for Low Copy Number Detection of Infectious Pathogens.

Authors:  Jacquelyn A DuVall; Juliane C Borba; Nazly Shafagati; Deborah Luzader; Nishant Shukla; Jingyi Li; Kylene Kehn-Hall; Melissa M Kendall; Sanford H Feldman; James P Landers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  An enzymatic on/off switch-mediated assay for KRAS hotspot point mutation detection of circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Qing-Lin Wang; Cui-Lan Zhou; Yu-Fang Yin; Li Xiao; Yuan Wang; Kai Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.