Literature DB >> 9216447

Methods for detection of point mutations: performance and quality assessment. IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Molecular Biology Techniques.

P Nollau1, C Wagener.   

Abstract

We give an overview of current methods for the detection of point mutations as well as small insertions and deletions in clinical diagnostics. For each method, the following characteristics are specified: (a) principle, (b) major modifications, (c) maximum fragment size that can be analyzed, (d) ratio and type of mutations that can be detected, (e) minimum ratio of mutant to wild-type alleles at which mutations can be detected, and (f) detection methods. Special attention is paid to the possibilities of quality assessment and the potential for standardization and automation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9216447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  33 in total

1.  Automated DNA mutation analysis by single-strand conformation polymorphism using capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection.

Authors:  M S Liu; S Rampal; D Hsiang; F T Chen
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Quantitative detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for a pooled sample by a bioluminometric assay coupled with modified primer extension reactions (BAMPER).

Authors:  G Zhou; M Kamahori; K Okano; G Chuan; K Harada; H Kambara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Novel amplification of DNA in a hairpin structure: towards a radical elimination of PCR errors from amplified DNA.

Authors:  Manjit Kaur; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Screening and characterization of mutations in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained in Brazil.

Authors:  Rosilene Fressatti Cardoso; Robert C Cooksey; Glenn P Morlock; Patricia Barco; Leticia Cecon; Francisco Forestiero; Clarice Q F Leite; Daisy N Sato; Maria de Lourdes Shikama; Elsa M Mamizuka; Rosario D C Hirata; Mario H Hirata
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  High-throughput single-base mismatch detection for genotyping of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) with probe capture assay coupled with modified allele-specific primer extension reaction (MASPER).

Authors:  Osamu Kisaki; Seiji Kato; Kohei Shinohara; Hisahide Hiura; Tomohiro Samori; Hiroshi Sato
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Mismatch-induced DNA unbending upon duplex opening.

Authors:  Chongli Yuan; Elizabeth Rhoades; Daniel M Heuer; Lynden A Archer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing.

Authors:  J Körkkö; S Annunen; T Pihlajamaa; D J Prockop; L Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Detection of simple mutations and polymorphisms in large genomic regions.

Authors:  E V Sokurenko; V Tchesnokova; A T Yeung; C A Oleykowski; E Trintchina; K T Hughes; R A Rashid; J M Brint; S L Moseley; S Lory
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  KRAS mutation: comparison of testing methods and tissue sampling techniques in colon cancer.

Authors:  Wilbur A Franklin; Jerry Haney; Michio Sugita; Lynne Bemis; Antonio Jimeno; Wells A Messersmith
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  KRAS mutation testing in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR therapies.

Authors:  D Soulières; W Greer; Anthony M Magliocco; D Huntsman; S Young; M-S Tsao; S Kamel-Reid
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.