Literature DB >> 27288718

Mirrored patterns of lateralized neuronal activation reflect old and new memories in the avian auditory cortex.

Elizabeth M Olson1, Rie K Maeda1, Sharon M H Gobes2.   

Abstract

In monolingual humans, language-related brain activation shows a distinct lateralized pattern, in which the left hemisphere is often dominant. Studies are not as conclusive regarding the localization of the underlying neural substrate for language in sequential language learners. Lateralization of the neural substrate for first and second language depends on a number of factors including proficiency and early experience with each language. Similar to humans learning speech, songbirds learn their vocalizations from a conspecific tutor early in development. Here, we show mirrored patterns of lateralization in the avian analog of the mammalian auditory cortex (the caudomedial nidopallium [NCM]) in sequentially tutored zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata​) in response to their first tutor song, learned early in development, and their second tutor song, learned later in development. The greater the retention of song from their first tutor, the more right-dominant the birds were when exposed to that song; the more birds learned from their second tutor, the more left-dominant they were when exposed to that song. Thus, the avian auditory cortex may preserve lateralized neuronal traces of old and new tutor song memories, which are dependent on proficiency of song learning. There is striking resemblance in humans: early-formed language representations are maintained in the brain even if exposure to that language is discontinued. The switching of hemispheric dominance related to the acquisition of early auditory memories and subsequent encoding of more recent memories may be an evolutionary adaptation in vocal learners necessary for the behavioral flexibility to acquire novel vocalizations, such as a second language.
Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Taeniopygia guttata; birdsong; memory; sensorimotor; songbird; speech

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27288718      PMCID: PMC4941105          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  40 in total

1.  Overhearing a language during childhood.

Authors:  Terry Kit-fong Au; Leah M Knightly; Sun-Ah Jun; Janet S Oh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

Review 2.  Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Brain activation and lexical learning: the impact of learning phase and word type.

Authors:  G Raboyeau; K Marcotte; D Adrover-Roig; A I Ansaldo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Brain processing of native and foreign languages.

Authors:  D Perani; S Dehaene; F Grassi; L Cohen; S F Cappa; E Dupoux; F Fazio; J Mehler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Neural responses in songbird forebrain reflect learning rates, acquired salience, and stimulus novelty after auditory discrimination training.

Authors:  Brittany A Bell; Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants.

Authors:  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Stanislas Dehaene; Lucie Hertz-Pannier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Language lateralization in schizophrenia, an fMRI study.

Authors:  I E Sommer; N F Ramsey; R S Kahn
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  A failure of left temporal cortex to specialize for language is an early emerging and fundamental property of autism.

Authors:  Lisa T Eyler; Karen Pierce; Eric Courchesne
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Motor circuits are required to encode a sensory model for imitative learning.

Authors:  Todd F Roberts; Sharon M H Gobes; Malavika Murugan; Bence P Ölveczky; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Functional identification of sensory mechanisms required for developmental song learning.

Authors:  Sarah E London; David F Clayton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The sensitive period for auditory-vocal learning in the zebra finch: Consequences of limited-model availability and multiple-tutor paradigms on song imitation.

Authors:  Sharon M H Gobes; Rebecca B Jennings; Rie K Maeda
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Aromatase and nonaromatase neurons in the zebra finch secondary auditory forebrain are indistinct in their song-driven gene induction and intrinsic electrophysiological properties.

Authors:  Catherine de Bournonville; Kyssia Ruth Mendoza; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Testosterone synthesis in the female songbird brain.

Authors:  Catherine de Bournonville; Aiden McGrath; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Bilateral brain activity in auditory regions is necessary for successful vocal learning in songbirds.

Authors:  Alexa H Pagliaro; Payal Arya; Hande C Piristine; Julia S Lord; Sharon M H Gobes
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Lateralization of social signal brain processing correlates with the degree of social integration in a songbird.

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Laurence Henry; Isabelle George; Schedir Marchesseau; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.