Literature DB >> 25475353

Neural responses in songbird forebrain reflect learning rates, acquired salience, and stimulus novelty after auditory discrimination training.

Brittany A Bell1, Mimi L Phan2, David S Vicario2.   

Abstract

How do social interactions form and modulate the neural representations of specific complex signals? This question can be addressed in the songbird auditory system. Like humans, songbirds learn to vocalize by imitating tutors heard during development. These learned vocalizations are important in reproductive and social interactions and in individual recognition. As a model for the social reinforcement of particular songs, male zebra finches were trained to peck for a food reward in response to one song stimulus (GO) and to withhold responding for another (NoGO). After performance reached criterion, single and multiunit neural responses to both trained and novel stimuli were obtained from multiple electrodes inserted bilaterally into two songbird auditory processing areas [caudomedial mesopallium (CMM) and caudomedial nidopallium (NCM)] of awake, restrained birds. Neurons in these areas undergo stimulus-specific adaptation to repeated song stimuli, and responses to familiar stimuli adapt more slowly than to novel stimuli. The results show that auditory responses differed in NCM and CMM for trained (GO and NoGO) stimuli vs. novel song stimuli. When subjects were grouped by the number of training days required to reach criterion, fast learners showed larger neural responses and faster stimulus-specific adaptation to all stimuli than slow learners in both areas. Furthermore, responses in NCM of fast learners were more strongly left-lateralized than in slow learners. Thus auditory responses in these sensory areas not only encode stimulus familiarity, but also reflect behavioral reinforcement in our paradigm, and can potentially be modulated by social interactions.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrophysiology; individual recognition; lateralization; songbird; stimulus specific adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475353      PMCID: PMC4346724          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00611.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

1.  The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Elena Dominguez-Marin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain.

Authors:  C V Mello; D S Vicario; D F Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mate recognition by female zebra finch: analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Nicolas Mathevon; Stéphane Mottin
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon.

Authors:  C Mello; F Nottebohm; D Clayton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task.

Authors:  Lauren M Guillette; Adam R Reddon; Marisa Hoeschele; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds.

Authors:  S J Chew; D S Vicario; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Nicolas Mathevon; Stéphane Mottin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression.

Authors:  Sarah C Woolley; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

1.  Auditory learning in an operant task with social reinforcement is dependent on neuroestrogen synthesis in the male songbird auditory cortex.

Authors:  Matheus Macedo-Lima; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  A Membrane G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Sex Differences in Zebra Finch Auditory Coding.

Authors:  Amanda A Krentzel; Matheus Macedo-Lima; Maaya Z Ikeda; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Aromatase and nonaromatase neurons in the zebra finch secondary auditory forebrain are indistinct in their song-driven gene induction and intrinsic electrophysiological properties.

Authors:  Catherine de Bournonville; Kyssia Ruth Mendoza; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Testosterone synthesis in the female songbird brain.

Authors:  Catherine de Bournonville; Aiden McGrath; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Mirrored patterns of lateralized neuronal activation reflect old and new memories in the avian auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Olson; Rie K Maeda; Sharon M H Gobes
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  ZENK induction in the zebra finch brain by song: Relationship to hemisphere, rhythm, oestradiol and sex.

Authors:  J Lampen; J D McAuley; S-E Chang; J Wade
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.627

7.  Dopamine D1 receptor activation drives plasticity in the songbird auditory pallium.

Authors:  Matheus Macedo-Lima; Hannah M Boyd; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  HDAC3 Inhibitor RGFP966 Modulates Neuronal Memory for Vocal Communication Signals in a Songbird Model.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; Mark M Gergues; Shafali Mahidadia; Jorge Jimenez-Castillo; David S Vicario; Kasia M Bieszczad
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 9.  Sensory Cortical Plasticity Participates in the Epigenetic Regulation of Robust Memory Formation.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; Kasia M Bieszczad
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Lateralization of social signal brain processing correlates with the degree of social integration in a songbird.

Authors:  Hugo Cousillas; Laurence Henry; Isabelle George; Schedir Marchesseau; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.