Literature DB >> 27288330

Comparison of Edwards SAPIEN 3 versus SAPIEN XT in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Difference of valve selection in the real world.

Takahide Arai1, Thierry Lefèvre2, Thomas Hovasse1, Marie-Claude Morice1, Philippe Garot1, Hakim Benamer1, Thierry Unterseeh1, Kentaro Hayashida3, Yusuke Watanabe4, Erik Bouvier1, Bertrand Cormier1, Bernard Chevalier1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SAPIEN 3 (S3; Edwards Lifescience, Irvine, CA, USA) is a new-generation percutaneous aortic valve with better profile, more precise handling and positioning, designed to reduce the risk of post-procedural paravalvular aortic leak (PVL). The aim of this study was to compare the S3 valve and SAPIEN XT valve (SXT).
METHODS: The last 89 transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cases using SXT were compared to the first 111 cases using the S3.
RESULTS: Patient age and logistic EuroSCORE were similar (83.1 years vs 83.0 years and 18.2% vs 16.6%) in the S3 and SXT groups, respectively as were other baseline characteristics. The ratio of valve diameter/calculated annulus average diameter (CAAD) by multi-detector row computed tomography was significantly lower in the S3 group (1.06 vs 1.09, p<0.001) as was the annular area oversizing percentage (11.3% vs 20.5%, p<0.001). Furthermore, a smaller valve was selected in S3 cases with borderline CAAD compared to SXT cases. Nevertheless, the frequency of paravalvular aortic leakage (PVL) ≥2 tended to be reduced in the S3 group (5% vs 9%, p=0.339). The rate of major vascular complications was significantly lower with S3 (3% vs 12%, p=0.013). In addition, 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the S3 group (0% vs 5%, p=0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: Although TAVI using S3 tended to be carried out with a less oversized valve compared to TAVI using SXT, the frequency of post-procedural PVL ≥2 tended to be lower in the S3 group. The outcomes including vascular complications and 30-day mortality showed a trend in favor of the S3 group.
Copyright © 2016 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAPIEN 3; SAPIEN XT; Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27288330     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small Anatomy: Patient Selection and Technical Challenges.

Authors:  Makoto Nakashima; Yusuke Watanabe
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

2.  Choice of desflurane or propofol for the maintenance of general anesthesia does not affect the risk of periprocedural myocardial damage in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Kenta Okitsu; Takeshi Iritakenishi; Tatsuyuki Imada; Michioki Kuri; Sho Carl Shibata; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation at a high-volume center: the Bad Rothenfelde experience.

Authors:  Marek Kowalski; Cornelia Deutsch; Steffen Hofmann; Norbert Franz; Michael Billion; Abbas Ferdosi; Peter Bramlage; Guram Imnadze; Henning Warnecke
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 4.  Comprehensive update on the new indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the latest 2017 European guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Tasalak Thonghong; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  Spotlight on the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve.

Authors:  Tobias Rheude; Johannes Blumenstein; Helge Möllmann; Oliver Husser
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 6.  Current results and remaining challenges of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement expansion in intermediate and low risk patients.

Authors:  Alfonso Ielasi; Azeem Latib; Maurizio Tespili; Francesco Donatelli
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-05-15

7.  Surgery after Failed Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Indications and Outcomes of a Concerning Condition.

Authors:  Mohamed Salem; Christina Grothusen; Mostafa Salem; Derk Frank; Mohammed Saad; Markus Ernst; Thomas Puehler; Georg Lutter; Assad Haneya; Jochen Cremer; Jan Schoettler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Challenges When Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation to Younger Patients.

Authors:  Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-11

9.  Evolution of transcatheter aortic valve implantation over 7 years: results of a prospective single-centre registry of 2000 patients in a large municipal hospital (TAVIK Registry).

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Valentin Herzberger; Jens Bergmann; Peter Bramlage; Lars O Conzelmann; Alexander Würth; Armin Luik; Holger Schröfel; Panagiotis Tzamalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.