Literature DB >> 27288032

Comparison of NHANES III and ERS/GLI 12 for airway obstruction classification and severity.

Olinto Linares-Perdomo1, Matthew Hegewald2, Dave S Collingridge3, Denitza Blagev4, Robert L Jensen4, John Hankinson5, Alan H Morris4.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and severity categorisation of obstructive lung disease is determined using reference values. The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society in 2005 recommended the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III spirometry prediction equations for patients in USA aged 8-80 years. The Global Lung Initiative 2012 (GLI 12) provided spirometry prediction equations for patients aged 3-95 years. Comparison of the NHANES III and GLI 12 prediction equations for diagnosing and categorising airway obstruction in patients in USA has not been made.We aimed to quantify the differences between NHANES III and GLI 12 predicted values in Caucasians aged 18-95 years, using both mathematical simulation and clinical data. We compared predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and lower limit of normal (LLN) FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) % for NHANES III and GLI 12 prediction equations by applying both a simulation model and clinical spirometry data to quantify differences in the diagnosis and categorisation of airway obstruction.Mathematical simulation revealed significant similarities and differences between prediction equations for both LLN FEV1/FVC % and predicted FEV1 There are significant differences when using GLI 12 and NHANES III to diagnose airway obstruction and severity in Caucasian patients aged 18-95 years.Similarities and differences exist between NHANES III and GLI 12 for some age and height combinations. The differences in LLN FEV1/FVC % and predicted FEV1 are most prominent in older taller/shorter individuals. The magnitude of the differences can be large and may result in differences in clinical management.
Copyright ©ERS 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27288032     DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01711-2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Effect of changing from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey III spirometry reference range to that of the Global Lung Initiative 2012 at Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service.

Authors:  Laura A K Embling; Debbie Zagami; Krishna Bajee Sriram; Robert J Gordon; Pathmanathan Sivakumaran
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Differences in Spirometry Predictive Equations in Classifying Presence and Degree of Lung Function Impairment: Which Suit Fits the Best?

Authors:  Marija Vukoja; Aleksandar Bokan; Gordana Vujasinovic; Ivan Kopitovic
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Racial and Ethnic Minorities Have a Lower Prevalence of Airflow Obstruction than Non-Hispanic Whites.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Hans Petersen; Congjian Liu; Orrin Myers; Xin Wang Shore; Bobbi A Gore; Rodrigo Vazquez-Guillamet; Linda S Cook; Paula Meek; Yohannes Tesfaigzi
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.069

4.  Impacts of Different Spirometry Reference Equations and Diagnostic Criteria on the Frequency of Airway Obstruction in Adult People of North China.

Authors:  Mengshuang Xie; Liwei Cui; Jinhuan Liu; Wei Wang; Jun Li; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-03-27

5.  Physiological Health and Physical Performance in Multiple Chemical Sensitivity-Described in the General Population.

Authors:  Anne A Bjerregaard; Marie W Petersen; Sine Skovbjerg; Lise K Gormsen; José G Cedeño-Laurent; Torben Jørgensen; Allan Linneberg; Thomas Meinertz Dantoft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Reference values for spirometry in elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study of different reference equations.

Authors:  Joana Belo; Teresa Palmeiro; Iolanda Caires; Ana L Papoila; Marta Alves; Pedro Carreiro-Martins; Maria A Botelho; Nuno Neuparth
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2018-01-09

7.  Implications of using the GLI-2012, GOLD and Australian COPD-X recommendations in assessing the severity of airflow limitation on spirometry among an Indigenous population with COPD: an Indigenous Australians perspective study.

Authors:  Subash Heraganahally; Timothy P Howarth; Elisha White; Helmi Ben Saad
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.