Literature DB >> 28149572

Effect of changing from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey III spirometry reference range to that of the Global Lung Initiative 2012 at Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service.

Laura A K Embling1, Debbie Zagami2, Krishna Bajee Sriram3, Robert J Gordon1, Pathmanathan Sivakumaran2.   

Abstract

The categorisation of lung disease into obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) and tendency to a restrictive ventilatory defect (TRVD) patterns using spirometry is used to guide both prognostication and treatment. The effectiveness of categorisation depends upon having reference ranges that accurately represent the population they describe. The Global Lung Initiative 2012 (GLI 2012) has spirometry reference ranges drawn from the largest sample size to date. This study aimed to determine whether using spirometry reference ranges from the new GLI 2012 dataset, compared to the previously used National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey III (NHANES III) dataset, resulted in a change in diagnosis between OVD, TRVD and normal ventilatory pattern (NVP). Spirometry data were collected from 301 patients, aged 18-80 years, undergoing investigation at the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (GCHHS) throughout February and March 2014. OVD was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) divided by forced vital capacity (FVC) less than lower limit of normal (LLN). TRVD was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN, FEV1 < LLN, and FVC < LLN. The LLN values were determined by equations from the GLI and NHANES datasets. Spirometry interpreted using the NHANES III equations showed: 102 individuals (33.9%) with normal spirometry, 136 (45.2%) with an OVD pattern, 52 (17.3%) with a TRVD pattern, and 11 (3.7%) with a mixed pattern. When the spirometry data were interpreted using the GLI 2012 equations 2 (0.7%) individuals changed from OVD to NVP, 2 (0.7%) changed from NVP to OVD and 14 (4.7%) changed from TRVD to NVP. Using the GLI 2012 reference range resulted in a change in diagnosis of lung disease in 5.9% of the individuals included in this study. This variance in diagnosis when changing reference ranges should be taken into account by clinicians as it may affect patient management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Respiratory function tests; spirometry reference equation

Year:  2016        PMID: 28149572      PMCID: PMC5227233          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  9 in total

1.  Interpretative strategies for lung function tests.

Authors:  R Pellegrino; G Viegi; V Brusasco; R O Crapo; F Burgos; R Casaburi; A Coates; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D C Johnson; N MacIntyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; O F Pedersen; J Wanger
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  Effects of adopting the new global lung function initiative 2012 reference equations on the interpretation of spirometry.

Authors:  Danny J Brazzale; Graham L Hall; Jeffrey J Pretto
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  The recent multi-ethnic global lung initiative 2012 (GLI2012) reference values don't reflect contemporary adult's North African spirometry.

Authors:  Helmi Ben Saad; Mohamed Nour El Attar; Khaoula Hadj Mabrouk; Ahmed Ben Abdelaziz; Ahmed Abdelghani; Mohamed Bousarssar; Khélifa Limam; Chiraz Maatoug; Hmida Bouslah; Ameur Charrada; Sonia Rouatbi
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.415

4.  Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population.

Authors:  J L Hankinson; J R Odencrantz; K B Fedan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  The Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference values reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry.

Authors:  Graham L Hall; Bruce R Thompson; Sanja Stanojevic; Michael J Abramson; Richard Beasley; Andrew Coates; Annette Dent; Brenton Eckert; Alan James; Sue Filsell; A W Bill Musk; Gary Nolan; Barbara Dixon; Chris O'Dea; Jenni Savage; Janet Stocks; Maureen P Swanney
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.424

6.  Implications of adopting the Global Lungs Initiative 2012 all-age reference equations for spirometry.

Authors:  Philip H Quanjer; Danny J Brazzale; Piotr W Boros; Jeffrey J Pretto
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Comparison of NHANES III and ERS/GLI 12 for airway obstruction classification and severity.

Authors:  Olinto Linares-Perdomo; Matthew Hegewald; Dave S Collingridge; Denitza Blagev; Robert L Jensen; John Hankinson; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations.

Authors:  Philip H Quanjer; Sanja Stanojevic; Tim J Cole; Xaver Baur; Graham L Hall; Bruce H Culver; Paul L Enright; John L Hankinson; Mary S M Ip; Jinping Zheng; Janet Stocks
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Applicability of the Global Lung Initiative 2012 Reference Values for Spirometry for Longitudinal Data of Elderly Women.

Authors:  Anke Hüls; Ursula Krämer; Sabine Stolz; Frauke Hennig; Barbara Hoffmann; Katja Ickstadt; Andrea Vierkötter; Tamara Schikowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effect of changing reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Thai people.

Authors:  Warawut Chaiwong; Sureeporn Uthaikhup; Chalerm Liwsrisakun; Chaicharn Pothirat
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.