Chami Im1, Jai Young Cho2, Ho-Seong Han1, Yoo-Seok Yoon1, YoungRok Choi1, Jae Yool Jang1, Hanlim Choi1, Jae Seong Jang1, Seong Uk Kwon1. 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea. jychogs@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A difficulty scoring system (DSS) based on the extent of liver resection, tumor location, liver function, tumor size, and tumor proximity to major vessels was recently developed to assess the difficulty of various laparoscopic liver resection procedures. We validated DSS in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 124 patients who underwent laparoscopic LLS between July 2003 and November 2015 and validated the DSS in 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic LLS for tumor according to their surgical outcomes. We also developed and evaluated the modified DSS in 34 patients who underwent LLS for intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones. RESULTS: The DSS score ranged from 3 to 6 in laparoscopic LLS for tumors. The median blood loss (P = 0.002) was significantly different among patients divided into subgroups by DSS score. We made modified DSS for IHD stones using factors influencing longer operation time, including stone location (P = 0.002), atrophy of liver parenchyma (P = 0.012), ductal stricture <1 cm from the bifurcation (P = 0.047), and combined choledochoscopic examination for remnant IHD (P < 0.001). The modified DSS score for IHD stones ranged from 3 to 7. Blood loss (P = 0.02) and operation time (P < 0.001) were significantly different among subgroups of patients divided by their difficulty scores. The median hospital stay (P = 0.004) and operation time (P = 0.039) were significantly longer and the complication rate (P = 0.025) and complication grade (P = 0.021) were significantly greater in patients with IHD stones than in patients with tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical difficulty varies among patients undergoing the same laparoscopic LLS procedure. The modified DSS developed here can also be applied to patients with IHD stones.
BACKGROUND: A difficulty scoring system (DSS) based on the extent of liver resection, tumor location, liver function, tumor size, and tumor proximity to major vessels was recently developed to assess the difficulty of various laparoscopic liver resection procedures. We validated DSS in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 124 patients who underwent laparoscopic LLS between July 2003 and November 2015 and validated the DSS in 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic LLS for tumor according to their surgical outcomes. We also developed and evaluated the modified DSS in 34 patients who underwent LLS for intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones. RESULTS: The DSS score ranged from 3 to 6 in laparoscopic LLS for tumors. The median blood loss (P = 0.002) was significantly different among patients divided into subgroups by DSS score. We made modified DSS for IHD stones using factors influencing longer operation time, including stone location (P = 0.002), atrophy of liver parenchyma (P = 0.012), ductal stricture <1 cm from the bifurcation (P = 0.047), and combined choledochoscopic examination for remnant IHD (P < 0.001). The modified DSS score for IHD stones ranged from 3 to 7. Blood loss (P = 0.02) and operation time (P < 0.001) were significantly different among subgroups of patients divided by their difficulty scores. The median hospital stay (P = 0.004) and operation time (P = 0.039) were significantly longer and the complication rate (P = 0.025) and complication grade (P = 0.021) were significantly greater in patients with IHD stones than in patients with tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical difficulty varies among patients undergoing the same laparoscopic LLS procedure. The modified DSS developed here can also be applied to patients with IHD stones.
Authors: Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ser Yee Lee; Brian K P Goh; Gholami Sepideh; John C Allen; Ryan P Merkow; Jin Yao Teo; Deepa Chandra; Ye Xin Koh; Ek Khoon Tan; Juinn Haur Kam; Peng Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Chung Yip Chan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Charing C N Chong; H T Lok; Andrew K Y Fung; Anthony K W Fong; Y S Cheung; John Wong; K F Lee; Paul B S Lai Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mizelle D'Silva; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Hae Won Lee; Jun Suh Lee; Boram Lee; Moonhwan Kim Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2022-01-13
Authors: Tan To Cheung; Ho-Seong Han; Wong Hoi She; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Pierce K H Chow; Boon Koon Yoong; Kit Fai Lee; Shoji Kubo; Chung Ngai Tang; Go Wakabayashi Journal: Liver Cancer Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 11.740