Literature DB >> 27287780

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Shi-Yi Wang1,2, Jessica B Long3,4, Brigid K Killelea3,5, Suzanne B Evans3,6, Kenneth B Roberts3,6, Andrea Silber3,7, Cary P Gross3,4.   

Abstract

Although preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect mammographically occult contralateral breast cancers (CBCs) among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the impact of MRI on the incidence of subsequent CBC events is unclear. We examined whether MRI use decreases CBC occurrences and detection of invasive disease among women who develop a CBC. Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset, we assessed overall, synchronous (<6 months after primary cancer diagnosis), and subsequent (≥6 months after diagnosis, i.e., metachronous) CBC occurrence in women aged 67-94 years diagnosed with DCIS during 2004-2009, with follow-up through 2011. We applied a matched propensity score approach to compare the stage-specific incidence rate of CBC according to MRI use. Our sample consisted of 9166 beneficiaries, 1258 (13.7 %) of whom received preoperative MRI. After propensity score matching, preoperative MRI use was significantly associated with a higher synchronous CBC detection rate (108.6 vs. 29.7 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.65; p < .001) with no significant differences in subsequent CBC rate (6.7 vs. 6.8 per 1000 person-years; HR = 0.90; p = .71). The 6-year cumulative incidence of any CBC (in situ plus invasive) remained significantly higher among women undergoing MRI, compared with those not undergoing MRI (9 vs. 4 %, p < .001). Women undergoing MRI also had a higher incidence of invasive CBC (4 vs. 3 %, p = .04). MRI use resulted in an increased detection of synchronous CBC but did not prevent subsequent CBC occurrence, suggesting that many of the undetected CBC lesions may not become clinically evident.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contralateral breast cancer occurrence; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Early detection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Overdiagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27287780      PMCID: PMC5554869          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3858-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  33 in total

1.  Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

Authors:  S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Elizabeth Morris; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Prioritization of research addressing management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Evan R Myers; Kristine M Schmit; Matthew J Crowley; Douglas C McCrory; Ranee Chatterjee; Remy R Coeytaux; Amy Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  A Fancellu; R M Turner; J M Dixon; A Pinna; P Cottu; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Robin Turner; Petra Macaskill; Lindsay W Turnbull; David R McCready; Todd M Tuttle; Neha Vapiwala; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The association of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and multiple breast surgeries among older women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Karen M Kuntz; Todd M Tuttle; David R Jacobs; Robert L Kane; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

View more
  4 in total

1.  Wherein the authors attempt to minimize the confusion generated by their study "Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ" by several commentators who disagree with them and a few who don't: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S A Narod; H Ahmed; V Sopik
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Long-term survival outcomes in invasive lobular carcinoma patients with and without preoperative MR imaging: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Eun Young Chae; Joo Hee Cha; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  RNA-Sequence Analysis Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in Patients Exhibiting Different Risks of Tumor Metastasis.

Authors:  Li-Feng Dong; Shu-Ying Xu; Jing-Pei Long; Fang Wan; Yi-Ding Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-11

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.