Literature DB >> 27286763

Evaluation of RPE-Select: A Web-Based Respiratory Protective Equipment Selector Tool.

Nick Vaughan1, Bob Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah2, Robert Atkinson3.   

Abstract

This article describes the evaluation of an open-access web-based respiratory protective equipment selector tool (RPE-Select, accessible at http://www.healthyworkinglives.com/rpe-selector). This tool is based on the principles of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) control banding (CB) tool, which was developed for the exposure risk management of hazardous chemicals in the workplace by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and general practice H&S professionals. RPE-Select can be used for identifying adequate and suitable RPE for dusts, fibres, mist (solvent, water, and oil based), sprays, volatile solids, fumes, gases, vapours, and actual or potential oxygen deficiency. It can be applied for substances and products with safety data sheets as well as for a large number of commonly encountered process-generated substances (PGS), such as poultry house dusts or welding fume. Potential international usability has been built-in by using the Hazard Statements developed for the Globally Harmonised System (GHS) and providing recommended RPE in picture form as well as with a written specification. Illustration helps to compensate for the variabilities in assigned protection factors across the world. RPE-Select uses easily understandable descriptions/explanations and an interactive stepwise flow for providing input/answers at each step. The output of the selection process is a report summarising the user input data and a selection of RPE, including types of filters where applicable, from which the user can select the appropriate one for each wearer. In addition, each report includes 'Dos' and 'Don'ts' for the recommended RPE. RPE-Select outcomes, based on up to 20 hypothetical use scenarios, were evaluated in comparison with other available RPE selection processes and tools, and by 32 independent users with a broad range of familiarities with industrial use scenarios in general and respiratory protection in particular. For scenarios involving substances having safety data sheets, 87% of RPE-Select outcomes resulted in a 'safe' RPE selection, while 98% 'safe' outcomes were achieved for scenarios involving process-generated substances. Reasons for the outliers were examined. User comments and opinions on the mechanics and usability of RPE-Select are also presented. © Crown copyright 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RPE; breathing apparatus; confined spaces; filters; occupational hygiene models; respirator; respiratory protective equipment; selection; selector tool; user evaluation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27286763      PMCID: PMC4965808          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mew035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  9 in total

Review 1.  European experiences in the development of approaches for the successful control of workplace health risks.

Authors:  C D Money
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Developing COSHH Essentials: dermal exposure, personal protective equipment and first aid.

Authors:  A N I Garrod; R Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2003-10

3.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs.

Authors:  Erik Tielemans; Nick Warren; Wouter Fransman; Martie Van Tongeren; Kevin McNally; Martin Tischer; Peter Ritchie; Hans Kromhout; Jody Schinkel; Thomas Schneider; John W Cherrie
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-11

4.  An assessment of workplace programmes designed to control inhalation risks using respiratory protective equipment.

Authors:  Nikki Bell; Nicholas P Vaughan; Len Morris; Peter Griffin
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-12-08

5.  Development of pragmatic exposure-control concentrations based on packaging regulation risk phrases.

Authors:  R J Gardner; P J Oldershaw
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1991-02

6.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model.

Authors:  Hans Marquart; Henri Heussen; Maaike Le Feber; Dook Noy; Erik Tielemans; Jody Schinkel; John West; Doeke Van Der Schaaf
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2008-06-27

7.  Industry's perception and use of occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  M D Topping; C R Williams; J M Devine
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1998-08

8.  Centreline velocity characteristics of rectangular unflanged hoods and slots under suction.

Authors:  B Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1977-10

9.  Deaths involving air-line respirators connected to inert gas sources.

Authors:  J B Hudnall; A Suruda; D L Campbell
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1993-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.