Literature DB >> 14530179

European experiences in the development of approaches for the successful control of workplace health risks.

C D Money1.   

Abstract

In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for the application of control banding concepts to the assessment and management of various workplace health and safety risks. Whilst many of the earlier approaches have originated in the UK, several of the most recent examples have been developed in Europe. The European schemes have attempted to build upon the lessons learned from the earlier control banding schemes and to apply them to new areas of health and safety. This paper analyses the evolution of the earlier approaches and reviews the more recent European developments in the context of continuing regulatory and societal demands for the improved assessment and regulation of workplace chemical risks.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530179     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meg061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of RPE-Select: A Web-Based Respiratory Protective Equipment Selector Tool.

Authors:  Nick Vaughan; Bob Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah; Robert Atkinson
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-06-10

2.  Can Control Banding be Useful for the Safe Handling of Nanomaterials? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adrienne Eastlake; Ralph Zumwalde; Charles Geraci
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Evaluation of the COSHH Essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; James Slaven; Russell B Bowen; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 4.  Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Authors:  M Dellarco; R Zaleski; B J Gaborek; H Qian; C A Bellin; P Egeghy; N Heard; O Jolliet; D R Lander; N Sunger; K S Stylianou; J Y Tanir
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Qualitative and quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models in typical industries.

Authors:  Fang Tian; Meibian Zhang; Lifang Zhou; Hua Zou; Aihong Wang; Mo Hao
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Risk Assessment of Nano-Flame Retardants Coating in the Selected Construction Industry of Iran by Control Banding Approach.

Authors:  Zahra Mohammadi; Masoume Vahabi; Seyed Mohammad Sadat; Rezvan Zendehdel
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-29

7.  Risk Assessment of Physical Hazards in Greek Hospitals Combining Staff's Perception, Experts' Evaluation and Objective Measurements.

Authors:  Styliani Gewrgios Tziaferi; Panayiota Sourtzi; Athina Kalokairinou; Evi Sgourou; Emmanouel Koumoulas; Emmanouel Velonakis
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  Occupational health policies on risk assessment in Japan.

Authors:  Seichi Horie
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2010-09-30

9.  Developing a semi-quantitative occupational risk prediction model for chemical exposures and its application to a national chemical exposure databank.

Authors:  Shih-Min Wang; Trong-Neng Wu; Yow-Jer Juang; Yu-Tung Dai; Perng-Jy Tsai; Chiu-Ying Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  European solvent industry group generic exposure scenario risk and exposure tool.

Authors:  Rosemary T Zaleski; Hua Qian; Michael P Zelenka; Anita George-Ares; Chris Money
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.563

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.