| Literature DB >> 27285314 |
Alexandra J C Hincke1, Tom Broere1, Wolfram M Kürschner2, Timme H Donders1, Friederike Wagner-Cremer1.
Abstract
The strong link between stomatal frequency and CO2 in woody plants is key for understanding past CO2 dynamics, predicting future change, and evaluating the significant role of vegetation in the hydrological cycle. Experimental validation is required to evaluate the long-term adaptive leaf response of C3 plants to CO2 conditions; however, studies to date have only focused on short-term single-season experiments and may not capture (1) the full ontogeny of leaves to experimental CO2 exposure or (2) the true adjustment of structural stomatal properties to CO2, which we postulate is likely to occur over several growing seasons. We conducted controlled growth chamber experiments at 150 ppmv, 450 ppmv and 800 ppmv CO2 with woody C3 shrub Betula nana (dwarf birch) over two successive annual growing seasons and evaluated the structural stomatal response to atmospheric CO2 conditions. We find that while some adjustment of leaf morphological and stomatal parameters occurred in the first growing season where plants are exposed to experimental CO2 conditions, amplified adjustment of non-plastic stomatal properties such as stomatal conductance occurred in the second year of experimental CO2 exposure. We postulate that the species response limit to CO2 of B. nana may occur around 400-450 ppmv. Our findings strongly support the necessity for multi-annual experiments in C3 perennials in order to evaluate the effects of environmental conditions and provide a likely explanation of the contradictory results between historical and palaeobotanical records and experimental data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27285314 PMCID: PMC4902311 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Leaf morphological and stomatal parameters.
The leaf morphological and stomatal parameters discussed in this paper and their conventional abbreviations and units.
| Parameter | Abbreviation | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Leaf area | LA | cm2 |
| Stomatal density | DS | n mm-2 |
| Epidermal cell density | DE | n mm-2 |
| Epidermal cell area | CAE | μm2 |
| Stomata index | SI | % |
| Maximum stomatal conductance | gsmax | mol m-2 s-1 |
| Pore length | LP | μm |
| Stomatal length | LS | μm |
| Guard cell width | LGC | μm |
| Maximum pore area | amax | m2 |
Mean leaf parameters at experimental CO2 levels in G1-1 and G1-2.
Mean leaf parameters at 66 and 73 experimental days. The leaf response clustered into two distinct stages (G1-1 and G1-2) in the first growing season (G1). Error in standard error of the mean. Tests of significance were two-tailed Student’s T-tests assuming unequal variance.
| Parameter (unit) | CO2 (ppmv) | G1-1 (66 days) | Change | G1-2 (73 days) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | 0.88 ± 0.13 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | <0.002 | ||
| 450 | 0.94 ± 0.12 | > | 0.66 ± 0.06 | <0.002 | |
| 800 | 1.37 ± 0.15 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | <0.002 | ||
| 150 | 1115.41 ± 172.17 | 962.21 ± 77.08 | ns | ||
| 450 | 945.15 ± 60.03 | > | 998.02 ± 33.42 | ns | |
| 800 | 1212.69 56.91 | 883.26 ± 61.3 | <0.02 | ||
| 150 | 968.12 ± 70.06 | 1588.69 ±84.18 | <0.001 | ||
| 450 | 881.99 ± 76.30 | < | 1497.45 ± 135.64 | <0.001 | |
| 800 | 1013.66 ±61.72 | 1286.29 ± 86.96 | <0.001 | ||
| 150 | 127.54 ± 12.53 | 162.82 ± 9.24 | <0.002 | ||
| 450 | 106.83 ± 9.6 | < | 163.42 ± 21.46 | <0.002 | |
| 800 | 119.88 4.8 | 147.74 ± 11.35 | <0.002 | ||
| 150 | 20.86 ± 1.31 | 18.46 ± 0.5 | ns | ||
| 450 | 26.82 ± 0.96 | > | 17.82 ± 0.66 | <0.003 | |
| 800 | 21.71 ±0.56 | 17.41 ± 0.52 | <0.003 | ||
| 150 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.06 | ns | ||
| 450 | 1.17 ± 0.05 | 1.08 ± 0.09 | ns | ||
| 800 | 1.1 ± 0.05 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | ns | ||
| 150 | 11.56 ± 0.049 | 9.31 ± 0.16 | <0.04 | ||
| 450 | 10.97 ± 0.52 | > | 9.8 ± 0.49 | ns | |
| 800 | 10.74 ± 0.57 | 10.32 ± 0.24 | ns |
Growth seasons and leaf generations.
The distinction of growth seasons and leaf generations as discussed in this paper.
| Growing season | Leaf flush | Leaf flush (days) | Data discussed (days) | Leaf generation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | First | 0–66 | 66 | G1-1 |
| Second | 73–94 | 80–94 | G1-2 | |
| 2014 | No distinction | No distinction | 44 | G2 |
Fig 1LA of B. nana leaves increases with CO2 and CAE in G1-2 and G2.
(A) LA was higher in successive CO2 steps in G1-2 and G2. Greenhouse leaves had slightly, but not significantly, larger LA than leaves grown in the 450 ppmv CO2 chamber. (B) Larger leaves have larger CAE. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Fig 2Response of structural stomatal parameters to CO2 in G1-2 and G2.
(A) DE decreased with CO2 in G1-2. In G2, DE is lower at 150 ppmv than in other CO2 treatments. (B) DS responded slightly to CO2 in G1-2 and shows a levelling-off of the response between 399–450 ppmv in G2. (C) SI did not respond to CO2 in G1-2. In G2, the SI response at 150 ppmv was significant with a levelling-off of response around 399 ppmv. (D) The gsmax did not respond to CO2 in G1-2. In G2, gsmax is highest at 150 ppmv, then decreased stepwise with CO2 until 450 ppmv, where the response levelled off. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisks below the bars indicate a significant difference (P<0.05) between parameter data in G1-2 and G2 for that CO2 level. Letter codes above the bars indicate significant differences; bars which share the same letter are significantly different.