Literature DB >> 11295163

Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO(2) concentration.

D L. Royer1.   

Abstract

A growing number of studies use the plant species-specific inverse relationship between atmospheric CO(2) concentration and stomatal density (SD) or stomatal index (SI) as a proxy for paleo-CO(2) levels. A total of 285 previously published SD and 145 SI responses to variable CO(2) concentrations from a pool of 176 C(3) plant species are analyzed here to test the reliability of this method. The percentage of responses inversely responding to CO(2) rises from 40 and 36% (for SD and SI, respectively) in experimental studies to 88 and 94% (for SD and SI, respectively) in fossil studies. The inconsistent experimental responses verify previous concerns involving this method, however the high percentage of fossil responses showing an inverse relationship clearly validates the method when applied over time scales of similar length. Furthermore, for all groups of observations, a positive relationship between CO(2) and SD/SI is found in only </=12% of cases. Thus, CO(2) appears to inversely affect stomatal initiation, although the mechanism may involve genetic adaptation and therefore is often not clearly expressed under short CO(2) exposure times.Experimental responses of SD and SI based on open-top chambers (OTCs) inversely relate to CO(2) less often than greenhouse-based responses (P<0.01 for both SD and SI), and should be avoided when experimental responses are required for CO(2) reconstructions. In the combined data set, hypostomatous species follow the inverse relationship more often than amphistomatous species (56 vs. 44% for SD; 69 vs. 32% for SI; P<0.03 for both comparisons). Both the SD and SI of fossil responses are equally likely to inversely relate to CO(2) when exposed to elevated versus subambient CO(2) concentrations (relative to today). This result casts doubt on previous claims that stomata cannot respond to CO(2) concentrations above present-day levels. Although the proportion of SD and SI responses inversely relating to CO(2) are similar, SD is more strongly affected by various environmental stresses, and thus SI-based CO(2) reconstructions are probably more accurate.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11295163     DOI: 10.1016/s0034-6667(00)00074-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Palaeobot Palynol        ISSN: 0034-6667            Impact factor:   1.940


  46 in total

1.  Changes in stomatal frequency and size during elongation of Tsuga heterophylla needles.

Authors:  Lenny L R Kouwenberg; Wolfram M Kürschner; Henk Visscher
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Recent trends in the intrinsic water-use efficiency of ringless rainforest trees in Borneo.

Authors:  N J Loader; R P D Walsh; I Robertson; K Bidin; R C Ong; G Reynolds; D McCarroll; M Gagen; G H F Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2.

Authors:  Penny J Tricker; Harriet Trewin; Olevi Kull; Graham J J Clarkson; Eve Eensalu; Matthew J Tallis; Alessio Colella; C Patrick Doncaster; Maurizio Sabatti; Gail Taylor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Linkages between CO2, climate, and evolution in deep time.

Authors:  Dana L Royer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; David J Beerling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Trait divergence, not plasticity, determines the success of a newly invasive plant.

Authors:  Gina L Marchini; Caitlin A Maraist; Mitchell B Cruzan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Stomatal numbers, leaf and canopy conductance, and the control of transpiration.

Authors:  Franco Miglietta; Alessandro Peressotti; Roberto Viola; Christian Körner; Jeffrey S Amthor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stomatal structure and physiology do not explain differences in water use among montane eucalypts.

Authors:  Mana Gharun; Tarryn L Turnbull; Sebastian Pfautsch; Mark A Adams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Reading a CO2 signal from fossil stomata.

Authors:  D J Beerling; D L Royer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Rapid atmospheric CO2 changes associated with the 8,200-years-B.P. cooling event.

Authors:  Friederike Wagner; Bent Aaby; Henk Visscher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.