Literature DB >> 27284367

Characterization of the T cell repertoire by deep T cell receptor sequencing in tissues and blood from patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Kenji Tamura1, Shoichi Hazama2, Rui Yamaguchi3, Seiya Imoto3, Hiroko Takenouchi2, Yuka Inoue2, Shinsuke Kanekiyo2, Yoshitaro Shindo2, Satoru Miyano3, Yusuke Nakamura1, Kazuma Kiyotani1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to characterize infiltrated T cell clones that define the tumor immune environment and are important in the response to treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to explore predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of immunochemotherapies, T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire analysis was performed using blood samples and tumor tissues obtained from patients with advanced CRC that had been treated with a combination of five-cancer peptide vaccines and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The TCR-α/β complementary DNAs (cDNAs), prepared from the messenger RNAs (mRNAs) obtained from 17 tumor tissues and 39 peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 9 CRC patients at various time points, were sequenced. The oligoclonal enrichment of certain TCR sequences was identified in tumor tissues and blood samples; however, only a few TCR sequences with a frequency of >0.1% were commonly detected in pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues, or in post-treatment blood and tissue samples. The average correlation coefficients of the TCR-α and TCR-β clonotype frequencies between the post-treatment tumor tissues and blood samples were 0.023 and 0.035, respectively, and were much lower compared with the correlation coefficients of the TCR-α and TCR-β clonotype frequencies between pre- and post-treatment blood samples (0.430 and 0.370, respectively), suggesting that T cell populations in tumor tissues vary from those in blood. Although the sample size was small, a tendency for the TCR diversity in tumor tissues to drastically decrease during the treatment was indicated in two patients, who exhibited a longer progression-free survival time. The results of the present study suggest that TCR diversity scores in tissues may be a useful predictive biomarker for the therapeutic effect of immunochemotherapy for patients with advanced CRC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T cell receptor repertoire; TCR-α; TCR-β; clonotype; colorectal cancer; diversity; predictive biomarker

Year:  2016        PMID: 27284367      PMCID: PMC4887943          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Accumulating data have indicated the significance of anti-tumor immune responses in the prognosis of patients with various types of cancer (1,2). Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were shown to be associated with the prognoses of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), and are also considered to be important as a predictor for the therapeutic response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy (3–7). Although immunotherapy using peptide vaccines is expected to be a promising method to treat cancer, it is not established as a treatment modality due to its lack of efficacy. Several mechanisms to protect cancer cells from host immune attacks in tumor tissues have been proposed (8–10). For example, the limitation of anti-tumor effects by cytotoxic T lymphocytes was partly explained by: i) Downregulation or loss of expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or targeted antigen proteins; ii) upregulation of programmed death-ligand 1 by tumor cells; iii) suppression of immune responses by production of the tryptophan catabolic enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by dendritic cells and macrophages; iv) accumulation of regulatory T cells; v) loss of the costimulatory molecules cluster of differentiation CD80 and CD86, which are ligands of CD28 and essential in inducing immune responses; and vi) production of strong immunosuppressive cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β. TILs are one of the key factors that define the tumor microenvironment and may act as a predictive biomarker for the response to immunotherapy. However, the majority of previous studies focus on the quantification of the number of TILs or CD8+ cells in tumors, without an examination of the functional or clonal characteristics that confer to anti-tumor immune effects (3–7). Characterizing the T cell repertoire in detail is essential to improve the understanding of the tumor microenvironment that is associated with the clinical responses to various cancer therapies. In addition, monitoring the immune responses in cancer patients during the treatment is also important. In humans, the majority (~95%) of T lymphocytes carry T cell receptors (TCRs), which consists of a heterodimer of an α-chain and a β-chain (11). The high degree of the diversity in TCRs is generated by a somatic recombination process of variable (V), diversity (D) (only for β-chain) and joining (J) exons, termed the V(D)J recombination (11). Random trimming and the addition of non-template nucleotides at the junction site significantly increase the TCR diversity. The rearrangement of the V, (D) and J segments defines the highly variable complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3), which is critical to characterize the antigen recognition specificity of individual T cell clones (12). A repertoire of 1015–18 various TCRs may be generated in humans (13,14). Therefore, the characterization of the TCR in TILs may reveal important information regarding the biologically important anti-tumor T cell responses (15). In the present study, the T cell repertoire was analyzed in blood samples and cancer tissues in advanced CRC patients that had received cancer vaccine treatment, with the aim of exploring predictive biomarkers for the efficacy prior to treatment, and for selecting of patients that are likely to exhibit better clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods

Patients

Due to the availability of surgical specimens, 9 out of 96 patients with advanced CRC that were enrolled in a previous phase II study (FXV study)were selected for the present study (16). All patients in the present study were enrolled at Yamaguchi University Hospital (Ube, Japan) between February 2009 and November 2012. A total of 17 tumor tissues from the surgical resection of primary or metastatic CRCs and 39 blood samples were collected, as summarized in Table I. Pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues were collected from 6 patients. Blood samples were collected at various time points, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL, USA; approval no., 13-0797) and Yamaguchi University (Ube, Japan; approval no., H23-135).
Table I.

Characteristics of patients with CRC and time points of sample collection.

PatientAge, yearsGenderResponseProgression-free survival, monthsOutcomeTime of tumor collection, type (weeks[a])Time of blood collection, weeks[a]
CRC155MalePR  9.6SuccumbedColon (−6), liver (83)0, 4, 8, 35, 59
CRC247FemaleSD  8.4SuccumbedColon (−79), pancreas (17)0, 4, 35
CRC366MaleSD23.8AliveColon (−142), lung (97)0, 4, 12, 35, 87
CRC461MalePR13.7AliveColon (−5), liver (63)0, 4, 19, 35, 59
CRC536MalePR17.8AliveColon (61)0, 4, 19, 35
CRC647FemalePR  9.4AliveColon (−4), liver (39)0, 5, 19, 35, 77
CRC765FemalePR  5.2SuccumbedColon (17)0, 4, 8, 19
CRC842MalePR11.8AliveColon (27), lung (27), pelvis (55)0, 4, 8, 23, 44
CRC969FemalePR  9.5AliveColon (−3), small intestine (33)0, 4, 19

Time of the sample collection was measured in weeks subsequent to the initiation of immunochemotherapy. Samples collected prior to the innitiation of immunochemotherapy are indicated by a negative number. CRC, colorectal cancer; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Library preparation

The libraries for TCR sequencing were prepared according to a previously established method (17). Total RNA was extracted from tumor tissues and PBMCs using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) with DNase treatment. Complementary DNA (cDNA) with the 5′-RACE adapter was synthesized using the SMART cDNA Library Construction kit and Advantage 2 Polymerase (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountainview, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Second-round polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the Platinum PCR SuperMix High Fidelity (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a forward fusion-primer, consisting of an Ion Torrent trP1 adaptor sequence and 5′ universal primer sequence, and a reverse fusion-primer consisting of an Ion Torrent A adaptor and specific sequence to the C region of the TCR-α or TCR-β (17). The amplification thermocycle consisted of: 3 min at 94°C; and 40 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 65°C and 1 min at 68°C; followed by purification using AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) to obtain a final library. The sequencing templates were prepared on the OneTouch2 system and subjected to DNA sequencing on the Ion PGM sequencer using the Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit and Ion 318 Chip kit v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Sequencing analysis

Raw fastq files were analyzed using Tcrip software (17). Briefly, each of the reads was separately mapped to the International ImMunoGeneTics reference sequences of the V, J and constant (C) gene segments of TCR-α or TCR-β using the Bowtie 2 aligner, version 2.1.0 (18,19). Among the reads that were properly mapped to the V, J and C segments, a junction sequence between the V and J segments in the read was analyzed for TCR-α and TCR-β. For TCR-α, the junction sequence was recognized as an N segment. For TCR-β, a D segment in the junction sequence was searched by scoring similarities of sub-sequences of the junction sequences with the reference sequences of D segments using a sliding window method (20), and then N1 and N2 segments were determined. Following the decomposition of reads into the V, D, J and C segments, the amino acid sequences of the CDR3 regions were determined, starting with the second conserved cysteine in the V segment and ending with the conserved phenylalanine in the J segment.

Statistical analysis

Correlation coefficient and TCR diversity was compared using the Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Pearson's correlation was used for correlation analysis All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical environment version 2.15.2 (available from, www.r-project.org).

Results

TCR sequencing of tumor and blood samples from advanced CRC patients

The sequences of TCR-α and TCR-β cDNAs were prepared from a total of 56 samples (17 tumor tissue samples and 39 blood samples) at different time points, which were obtained from 9 patients with advanced CRC that were treated with cancer vaccines, were analyzed (Table I). Through cDNA sequencing of TCR, on average 550,116±422,311 and 215,160±243,900 reads mapped to V(D)J and C segments were obtained for TCR-α and TCR-β, respectively. From the analysis of these reads, 32,608±28,216 unique clonotypes for TCR-α and 28,693±29,361 unique clonotypes for TCR-β were identified. Fig. 1A–D shows the representative results of patient CRC6. Enrichment of certain TCR sequences was observed in the tumor tissues and blood. However, the majority of enriched sequences with a frequency of >0.5% in pre- or post-treatment tumor samples were not commonly detected in these samples, and were not identified in TCR sequence reads in the blood samples of the same patients (Fig. 1A and B).
Figure 1.

Distribution of the TCR clonotype in tumor tissues and blood of 9 patients with CRC. Frequency distribution of clonotypes of (A) TCR-α and (B) TCR-β in tumor tissues and blood samples from patient CRC6. Clonotypes with functional CDR3 identified at >0.1% in at least one sample were plotted. The frequency was calculated based on the total reads, which include non-functional CDR3. Clonotype frequency plots of (C) TCR-α and (D) TCR-β in patient CRC6. Each dot on the scatter plots indicates a single clonotype with a normalized log10 clone count graphed at pre-treatment tumor tissue vs. post-treatment tumor tissue (left), pre-treatment blood vs. post-treatment blood (middle) and post-treatment tumor tissue vs. post-treatment blood (right). Blood sample at 35 weeks was used as post-treatment blood. Comparison of the correlation coefficient calculated in (E) TRC-α and (F) TRC-β clonotype frequency plots of 9 patients with CRC. The horizontal line indicates the median concentration, the box covers the 25–75 percentiles and the maximum length of each whisker is 1.5 times the interquartile range. Each dot indicates an outlier. TRC, T cell receptor; CRC, colorectal cancer; CDR3, complementarity determining region 3.

By applying the correlation analysis, a strong correlation was indicated in the TCR clonotypes among pre- and post-treatment blood samples (correlation coefficients, r=0.83 and 0.82 for TCR-α and TCR-β, respectively), but no correlation between pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues (r=0.001 and 0.006, respectively), or between tumor tissues and blood samples (r=0.017 and 0.018, respectively) were indicated (Fig. 1C and D). Similarly, the median correlation coefficients for comparing between the pre- and post-treatment tissue samples (n=6), were 0.006 and 0.002 for TCR-α and TCR-β, respectively, and 0.016 and 0.021 for TCR-α and TCR-β, respectively, in the tumor tissue and blood comparison (n=9), which were much smaller compared with the coefficients in the pre- and post-treatment blood comparison (n=9; 0.28 and 0.20 for TCR-α and TCR-β, respectively) (Fig. 1E and F). The heat map in Fig. 1G indicates that TCR sequences enriched in pre-treatment tumor tissues were undetectable in blood samples; but, notably, TCR sequences enriched in the post-treatment tumor tissues were detectable in the blood samples, although their frequencies were as low as 0.1–0.5%. Particularly, patient CRC3 showed a higher correlation coefficient between T cells in a post-treatment tumor tissue and blood sample, which shared an abundant TCR-β clonotype with TRBV7-2, TRBJ2-7 and CDR3 (sequence, CASSLDPGWTYEQYF). These results indicate that, although TCR clonotypes in tumor tissues are almost entirely different from those in blood samples, several TCR clonotypes enriched in tumor tissues were commonly observed in circulating lymphocytes during the treatment.

Association between TCR diversity and clinical outcome

The TCR diversity was calculated using the inverse Simpson's diversity index (1/Ds) (21), and the association between the TCR diversity and patients' clinical outcome was investigated. The 9 CRC patients were divided into two groups based on progression-free survival (PFS), consisting of the favorable (PFS ≥12 months) and unfavorable (PFS <12 months) groups, and then the TCR diversity between these two groups was compared (Fig. 2A and B). A tendency for lower diversity scores of TCR-α and TCR-β was indicated in post-treatment tumor tissues (TCR-α, P=0.16; TCR-β, P=0.14; Fig. 2C and D). A decrease in TCR diversity during treatment was also observed in the favorable group compared with the unfavorable group (TCR-α, P=0.19; TCR-β, P=0.29; Fig. 2E and F). In blood samples, the higher ratio of TCR-β diversity at the early time point (8–19 weeks subsequent to the initiation of treatment) relative to pre-treatment tended to associate with a longer PFS; in particular, the greatest ratio was observed in patient CRC3, who exhibited the longest PFS (Fig. 3A and B). Notably, the diversity of TCR-α and TCR-β in blood samples was markedly decreased following the surgical resection of tumors in two patients (CRC2 and CRC7).
Figure 2.

Association between TCR diversity in tumor tissues and clinical outcome of 9 patients with CRC. Changes in (A) TCR-α and (B) TCR-β diversity during treatment in 9 patients with CRC. Open circles and closed circles indicate the diversity in tumor tissues at pre- and post-treatment, respectively. Comparison of (C) TCR-α and (D) TCR-β diversity in post-treatment tumor tissues between the favorable (n=3) and unfavorable (n=6) groups. The horizontal line indicates the median concentration, the box covers the 25–75 percentiles and the maximum length of each whisker is 1.5 times of the interquartile range. Each dot outside the whiskers indicates an outlier. Comparison of the ratio of (E) TCR-α and (F) TCR-β diversity between favorable (n=2; CRC3 and CRC4) and unfavorable (n=4; CRC1, CRC2, CRC6 and CRC9) groups. The horizontal line indicates the median concentration, the box covers the 25–75 percentiles and the maximum length of each whisker is 1.5 times the interquartile range. CRC, colorectal cancer; TCR, T cell receptor; 1/Ds, inverse Simpson's diversity index; PFS, progression-free survival.

Figure 3.

Diversity of the TCR clonotype in blood from 9 patients with CRC. (A) TCR-α and (B) TCR-β diversity in blood samples at multiple time points in 9 patients with CRC. Open circles, closed circles and closed squares indicate the time points of pre-treatment, post-treatment and following surgery, respectively. TRC, T cell receptor; CRC, colorectal cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; 1/D, inverse Simpson's diversity index.

Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated that TILs are associated with the prognosis of patients with CRC, and are also considered to be an important predictor of therapeutic responses (3–7). However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the clonality or functionality of the T cells. In the present study, next-generation sequencers were used to comprehensively analyze the TCR repertoire in the tissue and blood samples obtained from advanced CRC patients that had been treated with cancer peptide vaccines in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and it was confirmed that the T cell repertoires in tissues varied from the T cell repertoires in blood samples, as previously described (22–27). Although previous studies only analyzed TCR clonotypes. The majority of the enriched TCR sequences observed in pre-treatment tumor tissues were undetectable in the blood samples, but several clones enriched in post-treatment tumor tissues were detectable in the blood at a low frequency of 0.1–0.5%. These common T cell populations in the post-treatment tissues and blood samples may possibly be activated in the lymph nodes near the vaccine injection sites and then circulate in theblood. Certain T cell clones had accumulated and activated in the tumor lesions. In addition, T cell repertoires were extremely different in the pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues, and in the primary and metastatic tumor tissues, indicating that the immune environment of cancer tissues changes markedly. In particular, the lack of a common clonotype between primary and lung metastatic tumors in patient CRC8, which were surgically resected at the same time, indicated the huge variation in the immune microenvironment, possibly due to the tumor heterogeneity or ‘seed-soil’ association, or a combination of the two. For the evaluation of the vaccine-specific immune responses of patients, several currently-available approaches exist, including an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay and an HLA-multimer assay (28). However, since an ex vivo expansion step of peripheral blood lymphocytes with antigen stimulation under certain cytokines is required, these methods are not suitable to quantitatively monitor patients' immune responses over time. Therefore, TCR sequencing with next generation sequencing was applied in order to monitor the immune responses. Increased TCR diversity in blood samples at an early time point, 8–19 weeks from the beginning of the treatment, was indicated to potentially reflect an improved immune response, in association with a better PFS (Fig. 3). A similar increase of TCR diversity was observed in another T cell repertoire analysis in non-small cell lung cancer patients that were treated with cancer peptide vaccines (17). The increases of TCR diversity in blood samples may possibly be explained by the following mechanism: Cancer cells that are damaged by the treatment are likely to be phagocytosed by antigen-presenting cells, which present various cancer-specific antigens on their cell surface and eventually induce the activation of various T cell populations, including killer and helper T cells. TCR diversity in the blood samples may reflect the extent of the damage of cancer cells. Notably, the surgical resection of the tumors in two patients resulted in a significant decrease of TCR diversity in blood samples (Fig. 3) and the enhancement of clonal expansion of certain T cell populations in blood samples. These results may reflect the strong inflammatory reactions that occur following surgical treatment, or may reflect the immune reactions in the blood due to the transient increase of circulating tumor cells during the surgical procedure. TCR diversity scores in blood samples may be a predictive biomarker for the therapeutic response in advanced CRC patients. However, accumulating a large amount of information is clinically important, as TCR diversity is extremely complex and is affected by various environmental stimuli. In summary, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to deeply analyze the TCR-α and TCR-β repertoires of tumor tissues and blood samples prior to and subsequent to immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC. Although the significance of the present results is limited due to the small sample size, T cell populations in tumor tissues prior to the treatment were indicated to be almost entirely different from those in blood, but demonstrate commonality subsequent to vaccine treatment. The decrease of TCR diversity in the tumor tissues during the treatment may also be associated with a longer PFS. These results suggest that TCR diversity scores in the tissues may be a useful predictive biomarker for the therapeutic effect of immunochemotherapy for advanced CRC patients.
  27 in total

1.  A direct estimate of the human alphabeta T cell receptor diversity.

Authors:  T P Arstila; A Casrouge; V Baron; J Even; J Kanellopoulos; P Kourilsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Primary exploration of CDR3 spectratyping and molecular features of TCR β chain in the peripheral blood and tissue of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianwei Zhou; Rui Ma; Rong Luo; Yongping Sun; Xiaoyan He; Wanbang Sun; Wentai Tang; Xinsheng Yao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Mechanisms of tumor escape from immune system: role of mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Alessandro Poggi; Alessandra Musso; Irene Dapino; Maria Raffaella Zocchi
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  Reverse ELISPOT assay for clonal analysis of cytokine production. I. Enumeration of gamma-interferon-secreting cells.

Authors:  C Czerkinsky; G Andersson; H P Ekre; L A Nilsson; L Klareskog; O Ouchterlony
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1988-05-25       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  Immune parameters affecting the efficacy of chemotherapeutic regimens.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Natural T-cell response against MHC class I epitopes of epithelial cell adhesion molecule, her-2/neu, and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Nagorsen; U Keilholz; L Rivoltini; A Schmittel; A Letsch; A M Asemissen; G Berger; H J Buhr; E Thiel; C Scheibenbogen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer therapies: reinstating immunosurveillance.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Mark J Smyth; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 31.745

10.  IMGT/GENE-DB: a comprehensive database for human and mouse immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes.

Authors:  Véronique Giudicelli; Denys Chaume; Marie-Paule Lefranc
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

1.  Profiling the pattern of the human T-cell receptor γδ complementary determinant region 3 repertoire in patients with lung carcinoma via high-throughput sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Mingjin Zou; Da Teng; Yu Hu; Jianmin Zhang; Wei He
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.530

2.  Characterization of the cryoablation-induced immune response in kidney cancer patients.

Authors:  Taigo Kato; Tomoyuki Iwasaki; Motohide Uemura; Akira Nagahara; Hiroki Higashihara; Keigo Osuga; Yuji Ikeda; Kazuma Kiyotani; Jae-Hyun Park; Norio Nonomura; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Combination immunotherapy with TLR agonists and checkpoint inhibitors suppresses head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Fumi Sato-Kaneko; Shiyin Yao; Alast Ahmadi; Shannon S Zhang; Tadashi Hosoya; Megan M Kaneda; Judith A Varner; Minya Pu; Karen S Messer; Cristiana Guiducci; Robert L Coffman; Kazutaka Kitaura; Takaji Matsutani; Ryuji Suzuki; Dennis A Carson; Tomoko Hayashi; Ezra Ew Cohen
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-09-21

4.  Overview of methodologies for T-cell receptor repertoire analysis.

Authors:  Elisa Rosati; C Marie Dowds; Evaggelia Liaskou; Eva Kristine Klemsdal Henriksen; Tom H Karlsen; Andre Franke
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.563

5.  Cetuximab strongly enhances immune cell infiltration into liver metastatic sites in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuka Inoue; Shoichi Hazama; Nobuaki Suzuki; Yukio Tokumitsu; Shinsuke Kanekiyo; Shinobu Tomochika; Ryouichi Tsunedomi; Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michihisa Iida; Kazuhiko Sakamoto; Shigeru Takeda; Tomio Ueno; Shigefumi Yoshino; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Genetic and Immune Changes Associated with Disease Progression under the Pressure of Oncolytic Therapy in A Neuroblastoma Outlier Patient.

Authors:  Lidia Franco-Luzón; Sandra García-Mulero; Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Gustavo Melen; David Ruano; Álvaro Lassaletta; Luís Madero; África González-Murillo; Manuel Ramírez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and immune microenvironment of multiple regions in breast cancers.

Authors:  Taigo Kato; Jae-Hyun Park; Kazuma Kiyotani; Yuji Ikeda; Yasuo Miyoshi; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

8.  Effective screening of T cells recognizing neoantigens and construction of T-cell receptor-engineered T cells.

Authors:  Taigo Kato; Tatsuo Matsuda; Yuji Ikeda; Jae-Hyun Park; Matthias Leisegang; Sachiko Yoshimura; Tetsuro Hikichi; Makiko Harada; Makda Zewde; Sho Sato; Kosei Hasegawa; Kazuma Kiyotani; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-13

9.  A pilot study of durvalumab and tremelimumab and immunogenomic dynamics in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Cesar August Santa-Maria; Taigo Kato; Jae-Hyun Park; Kazuma Kiyotani; Alfred Rademaker; Ami N Shah; Leeaht Gross; Luis Z Blanco; Sarika Jain; Lisa Flaum; Claudia Tellez; Regina Stein; Regina Uthe; William J Gradishar; Massimo Cristofanilli; Yusuke Nakamura; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-10

10.  Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and high dose IFN-α2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: safety, efficacy and impact on T-cell repertoire.

Authors:  Ahmad Tarhini; Yan Lin; Huang Lin; Zahra Rahman; Priyanka Vallabhaneni; Prateek Mendiratta; James F Pingpank; Matthew P Holtzman; Erik C Yusko; Julie A Rytlewski; Uma N M Rao; Robert L Ferris; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 13.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.