Literature DB >> 27283565

Compliance of NHS dental practice websites in Wales before and after the introduction of the GDC document 'Principles of ethical advertising'.

M L Budd1, M Davies, R Dewhurst, P A Atkin1.   

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the compliance of NHS dental practice websites in Wales, UK, with the 2012 GDC document Principles of ethical advertising, before its introduction (2011) and again after its introduction (2014).Methods All practices in Wales with an NHS contract and dental practice website were identified. The content of the website was evaluated to determine if it complied with the principles outlined in the 2012 GDC document Principles of Ethical Advertising.Results Twenty-five percent of the 446 practices sampled in 2011 had a website, compared to 44% of the 436 practices sampled in 2014. The principles best complied with were; displaying the name, geographic address, and telephone number of the practice (100% for both years). None of the websites compared the qualifications or skills of its practitioners to others, therefore 100% complied with this principle. Displaying team members' professional qualification and the country from which this is obtained was fairly well represented; 92% and 61% respectively in 2014; an improvement from only 50% and 49% respectively in 2011. Principles worst complied with were displaying the GDC's address (3% 2011; 9% 2014) or link to the GDC website (11% 2011; 7% 2014) and details of the practice complaints procedure (1% 2011; 5% 2014). Overall, no practice complied with all of the compulsory principles.Conclusion In both 2011 and 2014 no practice website was compliant with all the principles outlined in the 2012 GDC document Principles of ethical advertising. Reflecting results from previous studies, this study showed that compliance is slowly improving, yet over 4 years after the introduction of the mandatory principles, it remains that no practice website is 100% compliant.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283565     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  8 in total

1.  Does your practice website need updating?

Authors:  L D Addy; J Uberoi; R K Dubal; R McAndrew
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2005-03-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Attitudes of dentists and dental patients toward advertising.

Authors:  Kenneth E Clow; Robert E Stevens; C McConkey; David L Loudon
Journal:  Health Mark Q       Date:  2007

3.  Dental patients' use of the Internet.

Authors:  R Ní Ríordáin; C McCreary
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Quality and content of dental practice websites.

Authors:  L C Nichols; D Hassall
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  An audit of implant practice websites: content and regulatory compliance.

Authors:  H Raimundo; P K Robinson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  The quality of orthodontic practice websites.

Authors:  J Parekh; D S Gill
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Making people want dentistry.

Authors:  F Joyal
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  1998-07

8.  Perceptions of how the Internet has impacted on dentistry.

Authors:  I G Chestnutt; K Reynolds
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 1.626

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Advertising and facial aesthetics in primary care: how compliant are practice websites and social media with published guidance?

Authors:  Christopher C Donnell; Julian J Woolley; Stuart W Worthington
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.