Literature DB >> 27283403

Secular trends in fracture incidence in the UK between 1990 and 2012.

R Y van der Velde1,2, C E Wyers1,2, E M Curtis3, P P M M Geusens4,5, J P W van den Bergh1,2,5, F de Vries6,7, C Cooper8,9,10, T P van Staa7,11, N C Harvey3,12.   

Abstract

We studied sex-specific incidence rates in a population 50 years or older in the UK. In the period of 1990-2012, the overall rate of fracture did not change, but there were marked secular alterations in the rates of individual fracture types, particularly hip and spine fractures in the elderly.
INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence of secular changes in age- and sex- adjusted fracture incidence globally. Such observations broadly suggest decreasing rates in developed countries and increasing rates in transitioning populations. Since altered fracture rates have major implications for healthcare provision and planning, we investigated secular changes to age- and sex-adjusted fracture risk amongst the UK population aged 50 years or above from 1990 till 2012.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), which contains the health records of 6.9 % of the UK population. Site-specific fracture incidence was calculated by calendar year for men and women separately, with fracture type categorised according to ICD-9 classification. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate mean annualised change in absolute incidence. For presentational purposes, mean rates in the first 5 years and last 5 years of the period were calculated.
RESULTS: Overall fracture incidence was unchanged in both women and men from 1990 to 2012. The incidence of hip fracture remained stable amongst women (1990-1994 33.8 per 10,000 py; 2008-2012 33.5 per 10,000 py; p trend annualised change in incidence = 0.80) but rose in men across the same period (10.8 to 13.4 per 10,000 py; p = 0.002). Clinical vertebral fractures became more common in women (8.9 to 11.8 per 10,000 py; p = 0.005) but remained comparable in men (4.6 to 5.9 per 10,000 py; p = 0.72). Similarly, the frequency of radius/ulna fractures did not change in men (9.6 to 9.6 per 10,000 py; p = 0.25), but, in contrast, became less frequent in women (50.4 to 41.2 per 10,000 py; p = 0.001). Secular trends amongst fractures of the carpus, scapula, humerus, foot, pelvis, skull, clavicle, ankle, patella, and ribs varied according to fracture site and sex.
CONCLUSION: Although overall sex-specific fracture incidence in the UK population 50 years or over appears to have remained stable over the last two decades, there have been noticeable changes in rates of individual fracture types. Given that the impact of a fracture on morbidity, mortality, and health economy varies according to fracture site, these data inform the provision of healthcare services in the UK and elsewhere.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Fracture; Incidence; Osteoporosis; Secular trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283403      PMCID: PMC5035540          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3650-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  45 in total

1.  The UK General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  T Walley; A Mantgani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Secular trends in the osteoporotic fractures of the distal humerus in elderly women.

Authors:  M Palvanen; P Kannus; S Niemi; J Parkkari
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Emergency department visits due to vertebral fractures in the Netherlands, 1986-2008: steep increase in the oldest old, strong association with falls.

Authors:  Christian Oudshoorn; Klaas A Hartholt; M Carola Zillikens; Martien J M Panneman; Nathalie van der Velde; Edgar M Colin; Peter Patka; Tischa J M van der Cammen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Trends in hospital admissions for fractures of the hip and femur in England, 1989-1990 to 1997-1998.

Authors:  S Balasegaram; A Majeed; H Fitz-Clarence
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-03

5.  Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Yuqing Zhang; Douglas P Kiel; Marian T Hannan; David T Felson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Ecuador and projections for the future.

Authors:  Carlos H Orces
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2011-01

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: impact on health and economics.

Authors:  Nicholas Harvey; Elaine Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Maternal predictors of neonatal bone size and geometry: the Southampton Women's Survey.

Authors:  N C Harvey; M K Javaid; N K Arden; J R Poole; S R Crozier; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; E M Dennison; C Cooper
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  The use of a large pharmacoepidemiological database to study exposure to oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures: validation of study population and results.

Authors:  T P Van Staa; L Abenhaim; C Cooper; B Zhang; H G Leufkens
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Anti-osteoporosis drug prescribing after hip fracture in the UK: 2000-2010.

Authors:  C Klop; D Gibson-Smith; P J M Elders; P M J Welsing; H G M Leufkens; N C Harvey; J W J Bijlsma; T-P van Staa; F de Vries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  20 in total

1.  Systematic screening using FRAX® leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial.

Authors:  C M Parsons; N Harvey; L Shepstone; J A Kanis; E Lenaghan; S Clarke; R Fordham; N Gittoes; I Harvey; R Holland; N M Redmond; A Howe; T Marshall; T J Peters; D Torgerson; T W O'Neill; E McCloskey; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Emerging trends in hospitalisation for fragility fractures in Ireland.

Authors:  M A Kelly; B McGowan; M J McKenna; K Bennett; J J Carey; B Whelan; C Silke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Incidence of subsequent fractures in the UK between 1990 and 2012 among individuals 50 years or older.

Authors:  R Y van der Velde; C E Wyers; P P M M Geusens; J P W van den Bergh; F de Vries; C Cooper; T P van de Staa; N C Harvey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The epidemiology of wrist fractures in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  N C Wright; E R Hooker; C M Nielson; K E Ensrud; S L Harrison; E S Orwoll; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 6.  The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Rebecca J Moon; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Reprint of: The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Rebecca J Moon; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs       Date:  2017-04-26

8.  Secular trends of patients hospitalized for major osteoporotic fractures based on a national claims database.

Authors:  Yi-Lin Lee; Herng-Sheng Lee; Ching-Fang Tsai; Yueh-Han Hsu; Hsin-Yi Yang
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  The effect of social deprivation on hip fracture incidence in England has not changed over 14 years: an analysis of the English Hospital Episodes Statistics (2001-2015).

Authors:  A Bhimjiyani; J Neuburger; T Jones; Y Ben-Shlomo; C L Gregson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Trends in oral anti-osteoporosis drug prescription in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2012: Variation by age, sex, geographic location and ethnicity.

Authors:  R Y van der Velde; C E Wyers; E Teesselink; P P M M Geusens; J P W van den Bergh; F de Vries; C Cooper; N C Harvey; T P van Staa
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.