Xiaoyu Zhang1, Liang Guo2, Haoyu Zeng3, Stephen L White4, Michael Furniss2, Bharathi Balasubramanian3, Edward Lis3, Armando Lagrutta3, Frederick Sannajust3, Li Leyna Zhao1, Biao Xi1, Xiaobo Wang1, Myrtle Davis5, Yama A Abassi6. 1. ACEA Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA. 2. Laboratory of Investigative Toxicology, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. 3. SALAR, Safety & Exploratory Pharmacology Department, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486, USA. 4. Drug Synthesis & Chemistry Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 5. Toxicology and Pharmacology Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 6. ACEA Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA. Electronic address: yabassi@aceabio.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The ICH S7B guidelines recommend that all new chemical entities should be subjected to hERG repolarization screening due to its association with life-threatening "Torsades de Pointes" (TdP) arrhythmia. However, it has become evident that not all hERG channel inhibitors result in TdP and not all compounds that induce QT prolongation and TdP necessarily inhibit hERG. In order to address the limitations of the S7B/E14 guidelines, the FDA through a public/private partnership initiated the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative to examine the possible modification and refinement of the ICH E14/S7B guidelines. One of the main components of the CiPA initiative is to utilize a predictive assay system together with human cardiomyocytes for risk assessment of arrhythmia. METHOD: In this manuscript we utilize the xCELLigence® CardioECR system which simultaneously measures excitation-contraction coupling together with human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) to assess the effect of 8 reference compounds across 3 different independent sites. These 8 compounds were part of Phase I CiPA validation study. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that hERG channel blockers, such as E4031 and moxifloxacin, prolonged field potential duration (FPD) at low concentration and induced arrhythmic beating activity as measured by field potential (FP) recording and impedance (IMP) recordings at higher concentrations. On the contrary, nifedipine, an inhibitor of calcium channel, didn't disrupt the periodicity of cell beating and weakened cell contractile activity and shortened FPD. Multichannel inhibitors, such as flecainide, quinidine and mexiletine, not only increased FPD and induced arrhythmia but also significantly reduced the amplitude of FP spike. JNJ303, an IKs inhibitor, only affected FPD. Comparison of the compound effect on FPD across the 3 different sites is consistent in terms of trend of the effect with observed 3-10 fold differences in minimal effective concentration at which a minimum of 10% response is detected. In addition, pentamidine, a hERG trafficking inhibitor which induced irregular beating activity over a more prolonged duration of time was readily flagged in this assay system. Taken together, this multi-parameter assay using hiPSC-CMs in conjunction with simultaneous measurement of ion channel activity and contractility can be a reliable approach for risk assessment of proarrhythmic compounds.
INTRODUCTION: The ICH S7B guidelines recommend that all new chemical entities should be subjected to hERG repolarization screening due to its association with life-threatening "Torsades de Pointes" (TdP) arrhythmia. However, it has become evident that not all hERG channel inhibitors result in TdP and not all compounds that induce QT prolongation and TdP necessarily inhibit hERG. In order to address the limitations of the S7B/E14 guidelines, the FDA through a public/private partnership initiated the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative to examine the possible modification and refinement of the ICH E14/S7B guidelines. One of the main components of the CiPA initiative is to utilize a predictive assay system together with human cardiomyocytes for risk assessment of arrhythmia. METHOD: In this manuscript we utilize the xCELLigence® CardioECR system which simultaneously measures excitation-contraction coupling together with human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) to assess the effect of 8 reference compounds across 3 different independent sites. These 8 compounds were part of Phase I CiPA validation study. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that hERG channel blockers, such as E4031 and moxifloxacin, prolonged field potential duration (FPD) at low concentration and induced arrhythmic beating activity as measured by field potential (FP) recording and impedance (IMP) recordings at higher concentrations. On the contrary, nifedipine, an inhibitor of calcium channel, didn't disrupt the periodicity of cell beating and weakened cell contractile activity and shortened FPD. Multichannel inhibitors, such as flecainide, quinidine and mexiletine, not only increased FPD and induced arrhythmia but also significantly reduced the amplitude of FP spike. JNJ303, an IKs inhibitor, only affected FPD. Comparison of the compound effect on FPD across the 3 different sites is consistent in terms of trend of the effect with observed 3-10 fold differences in minimal effective concentration at which a minimum of 10% response is detected. In addition, pentamidine, a hERG trafficking inhibitor which induced irregular beating activity over a more prolonged duration of time was readily flagged in this assay system. Taken together, this multi-parameter assay using hiPSC-CMs in conjunction with simultaneous measurement of ion channel activity and contractility can be a reliable approach for risk assessment of proarrhythmic compounds.
Authors: Hua Rong Lu; Haoyu Zeng; Ralf Kettenhofen; Liang Guo; Ivan Kopljar; Karel van Ammel; Fetene Tekle; Ard Teisman; Jin Zhai; Holly Clouse; Jennifer Pierson; Michael Furniss; Armando Lagrutta; Frederick Sannajust; David J Gallacher Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Tanja Grkovic; Jason R Evans; Rhone K Akee; Liang Guo; Myrtle Davis; Johnson Jato; Paul G Grothaus; Michelle Ahalt-Gottholm; Melinda Hollingshead; Jerry M Collins; David J Newman; Barry R O'Keefe Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Armando Lagrutta; Christopher P Regan; Haoyu Zeng; John P Imredy; Kenneth Koeplinger; Pierre Morissette; Liping Liu; Gordon Wollenberg; Christopher Brynczka; José Lebrón; Joseph DeGeorge; Frederick Sannajust Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ivan Kopljar; Hua Rong Lu; Karel Van Ammel; Martin Otava; Fetene Tekle; Ard Teisman; David J Gallacher Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 7.765