Corina T Bot1, Krisztina Juhasz2, Fabian Haeusermann3, Liudmila Polonchuk3, Martin Traebert4, Sonja Stoelzle-Feix5. 1. Nanion Technologies, Inc., 1 Naylon Place, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA. 2. Nanion Technologies GmbH, Ganghoferstrasse 70A, 80339 Munich, Germany; Institute for Nanoelectronics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 3. Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Bldg. 73/R. 103b, Grenzacherstr. 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland. 4. Safety Pharmacology, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. 5. Nanion Technologies GmbH, Ganghoferstrasse 70A, 80339 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: sonja@nanion.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since 2005 the S7B and E14 guidances from ICH and FDA have been in place to assess a potential drug candidate's ability to cause long QT syndrome. To refine these guidelines, the FDA proposed the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative, where the assessment of drug effects on cardiac repolarization was one subject of investigation. Within the myocyte validation study, effects of pharmaceutical compounds on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) were assessed and this article will focus on the evaluation of the proarrhythmic potential of 23 blinded drugs in four hiPSC-CM cell lines. METHODS: Experiments were performed on the CardioExcyte 96 at different sites. A combined readout of contractility (via impedance) and electrophysiology endpoints (field potentials) was performed. RESULTS: Our data demonstrates that hERG blockers such as dofetilide and further high risk categorized compounds prolong the field potential duration. Arrhythmia were detected in both impedance as well as field potential recordings. Intermediate risk compounds induced arrhythmia in almost all cases at the highest dose. In the case of low risk compounds, either a decrease in FPDmax was observed, or not a significant change from pre-addition control values. DISCUSSION: With exceptions, hiPSC-CMs are sensitive and exhibit at least 10% delayed or shortened repolarization from pre-addition values and arrhythmia after drug application and thus can provide predictive cardiac electrophysiology data. The baseline electrophysiological parameters vary between iPS cells from different sources, therefore positive and negative control recordings are recommended.
INTRODUCTION: Since 2005 the S7B and E14 guidances from ICH and FDA have been in place to assess a potential drug candidate's ability to cause long QT syndrome. To refine these guidelines, the FDA proposed the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative, where the assessment of drug effects on cardiac repolarization was one subject of investigation. Within the myocyte validation study, effects of pharmaceutical compounds on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) were assessed and this article will focus on the evaluation of the proarrhythmic potential of 23 blinded drugs in four hiPSC-CM cell lines. METHODS: Experiments were performed on the CardioExcyte 96 at different sites. A combined readout of contractility (via impedance) and electrophysiology endpoints (field potentials) was performed. RESULTS: Our data demonstrates that hERG blockers such as dofetilide and further high risk categorized compounds prolong the field potential duration. Arrhythmia were detected in both impedance as well as field potential recordings. Intermediate risk compounds induced arrhythmia in almost all cases at the highest dose. In the case of low risk compounds, either a decrease in FPDmax was observed, or not a significant change from pre-addition control values. DISCUSSION: With exceptions, hiPSC-CMs are sensitive and exhibit at least 10% delayed or shortened repolarization from pre-addition values and arrhythmia after drug application and thus can provide predictive cardiac electrophysiology data. The baseline electrophysiological parameters vary between iPS cells from different sources, therefore positive and negative control recordings are recommended.
Authors: Alison Obergrussberger; Andrea Brüggemann; Tom A Goetze; Markus Rapedius; Claudia Haarmann; Ilka Rinke; Nadine Becker; Takayuki Oka; Atsushi Ohtsuki; Timo Stengel; Marius Vogel; Juergen Steindl; Max Mueller; Johannes Stiehler; Michael George; Niels Fertig Journal: J Lab Autom Date: 2015-12-23
Authors: Emiliano R Diez; Natalia J Prado; Adriana M Carrión; Elena R Petrich; Amira Z Ponce Zumino; Roberto M Miatello Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Birgit Goversen; Nadine Becker; Sonja Stoelzle-Feix; Alison Obergrussberger; Marc A Vos; Toon A B van Veen; Niels Fertig; Teun P de Boer Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Hua Rong Lu; Haoyu Zeng; Ralf Kettenhofen; Liang Guo; Ivan Kopljar; Karel van Ammel; Fetene Tekle; Ard Teisman; Jin Zhai; Holly Clouse; Jennifer Pierson; Michael Furniss; Armando Lagrutta; Frederick Sannajust; David J Gallacher Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Verena Charwat; Bérénice Charrez; Brian A Siemons; Henrik Finsberg; Karoline H Jæger; Andrew G Edwards; Nathaniel Huebsch; Samuel Wall; Evan Miller; Aslak Tveito; Kevin E Healy Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci Date: 2022-07-29
Authors: Umber Saleem; Berend J van Meer; Puspita A Katili; Nurul A N Mohd Yusof; Ingra Mannhardt; Ana Krotenberg Garcia; Leon Tertoolen; Tessa de Korte; Maria L H Vlaming; Karen McGlynn; Jessica Nebel; Anthony Bahinski; Kate Harris; Eric Rossman; Xiaoping Xu; Francis L Burton; Godfrey L Smith; Peter Clements; Christine L Mummery; Thomas Eschenhagen; Arne Hansen; Chris Denning Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Eline Huethorst; Marie Fa Cutiongco; Fraser A Campbell; Anwer Saeed; Rachel Love; Paul M Reynolds; Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard Journal: Biofabrication Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 9.954
Authors: Ingra Mannhardt; Umber Saleem; Diogo Mosqueira; Malte F Loos; Bärbel M Ulmer; Marc D Lemoine; Camilla Larsson; Caroline Améen; Tessa de Korte; Maria L H Vlaming; Kate Harris; Peter Clements; Chris Denning; Arne Hansen; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Markus Johansson; Benjamin Ulfenborg; Christian X Andersson; Sepideh Heydarkhan-Hagvall; Anders Jeppsson; Peter Sartipy; Jane Synnergren Journal: Biol Open Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 2.422