Aleix Prat1, Maggie C U Cheang2, Patricia Galván3, Paolo Nuciforo4, Laia Paré3, Barbara Adamo3, Montserrat Muñoz3, Margarida Viladot3, Michael F Press5, Robert Gagnon6, Catherine Ellis7, Stephen Johnston8. 1. Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain2Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain3Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Division of Clinical Studies, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, England. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain3Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain. 5. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California. 6. Novartis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey. 7. GlaxoSmithKline Oncology, Collegeville, Pennsylvania. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, England.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The value of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer (luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [currently known as ERBB2, but referred to as HER2 in this study]-enriched, and basal-like) in the metastatic setting is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer with outcome and/or benefit in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Unplanned retrospective analysis of 821 tumor samples (85.7% primary and 14.3% metastatic) from the EGF30008 phase 3 clinical trial (NCT00073528), in which postmenopausal women with HR-positive invasive breast cancer and no prior therapy for advanced or metastatic disease were randomized to letrozole with or without lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Tumor samples were classified into each subtype using the research-based PAM50 classifier. Prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant antiestrogen therapy was allowed. Patients with extensive symptomatic visceral disease were excluded. Treatment effects were evaluated using interaction tests. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary and secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The median (range) age was 62 (31-94) years. Intrinsic subtype was the strongest prognostic factor independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in all patients, and in patients with HER2-negative (n = 644) or HER2-positive (n = 157) diseases. Median progression-free survival differed across the intrinsic subtypes of clinically HER2-negative disease: luminal A (16.9 [95% CI, 14.1-19.9] months), luminal B (11.0 [95% CI, 9.6-13.6] months), HER2-enriched (4.7 [95% CI, 2.7-10.8] months), and basal-like (4.1 [95% CI, 2.5-13.8] months). Median OS also differed across the intrinsic subtypes: luminal A (45 [95% CI, 41-not applicable {NA}] months), luminal B (37 [95% CI, 31-42] months), HER2-enriched (16 [95% CI, 10-NA] months), and basal-like (23 [95% CI, 12-NA] months). Patients with HER2-negative/HER2-enriched disease benefited from lapatinib therapy (median PFS, 6.49 vs 2.60 months; progression-free survival hazard ratio, 0.238 [95% CI, 0.066-0.863]; interaction P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study to reveal an association between intrinsic subtype and outcome in first-line HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative disease with a HER2-enriched profile may benefit from lapatinib in combination with endocrine therapy. The clinical value of intrinsic subtyping in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer warrants further investigation, but patients with luminal A/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer might be good candidates for letrozole monotherapy in the first-line setting regardless of visceral disease and number of metastases.
IMPORTANCE: The value of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer (luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [currently known as ERBB2, but referred to as HER2 in this study]-enriched, and basal-like) in the metastatic setting is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer with outcome and/or benefit in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Unplanned retrospective analysis of 821 tumor samples (85.7% primary and 14.3% metastatic) from the EGF30008 phase 3 clinical trial (NCT00073528), in which postmenopausal women with HR-positive invasive breast cancer and no prior therapy for advanced or metastatic disease were randomized to letrozole with or without lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Tumor samples were classified into each subtype using the research-based PAM50 classifier. Prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant antiestrogen therapy was allowed. Patients with extensive symptomatic visceral disease were excluded. Treatment effects were evaluated using interaction tests. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary and secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The median (range) age was 62 (31-94) years. Intrinsic subtype was the strongest prognostic factor independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in all patients, and in patients with HER2-negative (n = 644) or HER2-positive (n = 157) diseases. Median progression-free survival differed across the intrinsic subtypes of clinically HER2-negative disease: luminal A (16.9 [95% CI, 14.1-19.9] months), luminal B (11.0 [95% CI, 9.6-13.6] months), HER2-enriched (4.7 [95% CI, 2.7-10.8] months), and basal-like (4.1 [95% CI, 2.5-13.8] months). Median OS also differed across the intrinsic subtypes: luminal A (45 [95% CI, 41-not applicable {NA}] months), luminal B (37 [95% CI, 31-42] months), HER2-enriched (16 [95% CI, 10-NA] months), and basal-like (23 [95% CI, 12-NA] months). Patients with HER2-negative/HER2-enriched disease benefited from lapatinib therapy (median PFS, 6.49 vs 2.60 months; progression-free survival hazard ratio, 0.238 [95% CI, 0.066-0.863]; interaction P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study to reveal an association between intrinsic subtype and outcome in first-line HR-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative disease with a HER2-enriched profile may benefit from lapatinib in combination with endocrine therapy. The clinical value of intrinsic subtyping in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer warrants further investigation, but patients with luminal A/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer might be good candidates for letrozole monotherapy in the first-line setting regardless of visceral disease and number of metastases.
Authors: Aleix Prat; Jan Christoph Brase; Yuan Cheng; Paolo Nuciforo; Laia Paré; Tomás Pascual; Débora Martínez; Patricia Galván; Maria Vidal; Barbara Adamo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; José Baselga; Eva Ciruelos Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-01-24
Authors: H Evin Gulbahce; Philip S Bernard; Erin K Weltzien; Rachel E Factor; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan; Carol Sweeney Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Aleix Prat; Tomás Pascual; Carmine De Angelis; Carolina Gutierrez; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Tao Wang; Javier Cortés; Brent Rexer; Laia Paré; Andres Forero; Antonio C Wolff; Serafín Morales; Barbara Adamo; Fara Brasó-Maristany; Maria Vidal; Jamunarani Veeraraghavan; Ian Krop; Patricia Galván; Anne C Pavlick; Begoña Bermejo; Miguel Izquierdo; Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Mafalda Oliveira; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Gaia Griguolo; Roberta Fasani; Paolo Nuciforo; Joel S Parker; PierFranco Conte; Rachel Schiff; Valentina Guarneri; C Kent Osborne; Mothaffar F Rimawi Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Juan M Cejalvo; Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas; Patricia Galván; Susana García-Recio; Octavio Burgués Gasión; Laia Paré; Silvia Antolín; Rosella Martinello; Isabel Blancas; Barbara Adamo; Ángel Guerrero-Zotano; Montserrat Muñoz; Paolo Nucíforo; María Vidal; Ramón M Pérez; José I Chacón López-Muniz; Rosalía Caballero; Vicente Peg; Eva Carrasco; Federico Rojo; Charles M Perou; Javier Cortés; Vincenzo Adamo; Joan Albanell; Roger R Gomis; Ana Lluch; Aleix Prat Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yun Shin Chun; Takashi Mizuno; Jordan M Cloyd; Min Jin Ha; Kiyohiko Omichi; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Naoto T Ueno; Henry M Kuerer; Carlos H Barcenas; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-03-28 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Melissa A Troester; Xuezheng Sun; Emma H Allott; Joseph Geradts; Stephanie M Cohen; Chiu-Kit Tse; Erin L Kirk; Leigh B Thorne; Michelle Mathews; Yan Li; Zhiyuan Hu; Whitney R Robinson; Katherine A Hoadley; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; H Shelton Earp; Andrew F Olshan; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506