Literature DB >> 27281205

Systemic RNA delivery to dendritic cells exploits antiviral defence for cancer immunotherapy.

Lena M Kranz1,2, Mustafa Diken1,3, Heinrich Haas3, Sebastian Kreiter1,3, Carmen Loquai4, Kerstin C Reuter3, Martin Meng3, Daniel Fritz3, Fulvia Vascotto1, Hossam Hefesha3, Christian Grunwitz2,3, Mathias Vormehr2,3, Yves Hüsemann3, Abderraouf Selmi1,2, Andreas N Kuhn3, Janina Buck3, Evelyna Derhovanessian3, Richard Rae1, Sebastian Attig1,2, Jan Diekmann3, Robert A Jabulowsky3, Sandra Heesch3, Jessica Hassel5, Peter Langguth6, Stephan Grabbe4, Christoph Huber1,3, Özlem Türeci7, Ugur Sahin1,2,3.   

Abstract

Lymphoid organs, in which antigen presenting cells (APCs) are in close proximity to T cells, are the ideal microenvironment for efficient priming and amplification of T-cell responses. However, the systemic delivery of vaccine antigens into dendritic cells (DCs) is hampered by various technical challenges. Here we show that DCs can be targeted precisely and effectively in vivo using intravenously administered RNA-lipoplexes (RNA-LPX) based on well-known lipid carriers by optimally adjusting net charge, without the need for functionalization of particles with molecular ligands. The LPX protects RNA from extracellular ribonucleases and mediates its efficient uptake and expression of the encoded antigen by DC populations and macrophages in various lymphoid compartments. RNA-LPX triggers interferon-α (IFNα) release by plasmacytoid DCs and macrophages. Consequently, DC maturation in situ and inflammatory immune mechanisms reminiscent of those in the early systemic phase of viral infection are activated. We show that RNA-LPX encoding viral or mutant neo-antigens or endogenous self-antigens induce strong effector and memory T-cell responses, and mediate potent IFNα-dependent rejection of progressive tumours. A phase I dose-escalation trial testing RNA-LPX that encode shared tumour antigens is ongoing. In the first three melanoma patients treated at a low-dose level, IFNα and strong antigen-specific T-cell responses were induced, supporting the identified mode of action and potency. As any polypeptide-based antigen can be encoded as RNA, RNA-LPX represent a universally applicable vaccine class for systemic DC targeting and synchronized induction of both highly potent adaptive as well as type-I-IFN-mediated innate immune mechanisms for cancer immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27281205     DOI: 10.1038/nature18300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  50 in total

Review 1.  Innate immune recognition.

Authors:  Charles A Janeway; Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 28.527

2.  Cross-priming of CD8+ T cells stimulated by virus-induced type I interferon.

Authors:  Agnes Le Bon; Nathalie Etchart; Cornelia Rossmann; Miranda Ashton; Sam Hou; Dirk Gewert; Persephone Borrow; David F Tough
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-09-21       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells.

Authors:  Silke Holtkamp; Sebastian Kreiter; Abderraouf Selmi; Petra Simon; Michael Koslowski; Christoph Huber; Ozlem Türeci; Ugur Sahin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Type I interferons in host defense.

Authors:  Daniel B Stetson; Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 5.  The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self.

Authors:  C A Janeway
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1992-01

Review 6.  Dendritic-cell immunotherapy: from ex vivo loading to in vivo targeting.

Authors:  Paul J Tacken; I Jolanda M de Vries; Ruurd Torensma; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Mutant MHC class II epitopes drive therapeutic immune responses to cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Kreiter; Mathias Vormehr; Niels van de Roemer; Mustafa Diken; Martin Löwer; Jan Diekmann; Sebastian Boegel; Barbara Schrörs; Fulvia Vascotto; John C Castle; Arbel D Tadmor; Stephen P Schoenberger; Christoph Huber; Özlem Türeci; Ugur Sahin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Type I IFN counteracts the induction of antigen-specific immune responses by lipid-based delivery of mRNA vaccines.

Authors:  Charlotte Pollard; Joanna Rejman; Winni De Haes; Bernard Verrier; Ellen Van Gulck; Thomas Naessens; Stefaan De Smedt; Pieter Bogaert; Johan Grooten; Guido Vanham; Stefaan De Koker
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 9.  Type I interferons in anticancer immunity.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Oliver Kepp; Mark J Smyth; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 10.  Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: formulation and delivery strategies.

Authors:  Samir Mitragotri; Paul A Burke; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 84.694

View more
  421 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic targeting of trained immunity.

Authors:  Willem J M Mulder; Jordi Ochando; Leo A B Joosten; Zahi A Fayad; Mihai G Netea
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Delivery of mRNA vaccine with a lipid-like material potentiates antitumor efficacy through Toll-like receptor 4 signaling.

Authors:  Hongxia Zhang; Xinru You; Xiaojuan Wang; Lei Cui; Zining Wang; Feifei Xu; Mengyun Li; Zhenggang Yang; Jinyun Liu; Peng Huang; Yang Kang; Jun Wu; Xiaojun Xia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Owen S Fenton; Katy N Olafson; Padmini S Pillai; Michael J Mitchell; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Melanoma vaccines: clinical status and immune endpoints.

Authors:  Deena M Maurer; Lisa H Butterfield; Lazar Vujanovic
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel S Riley; Carl H June; Robert Langer; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Structurally Programmed Assembly of Translation Initiation Nanoplex for Superior mRNA Delivery.

Authors:  Jiahe Li; Wade Wang; Yanpu He; Yingzhong Li; Emily Z Yan; Ketian Zhang; Darrell J Irvine; Paula T Hammond
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Nanoscale platforms for messenger RNA delivery.

Authors:  Bin Li; Xinfu Zhang; Yizhou Dong
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2018-05-04

Review 8.  Genomic Approaches to Understanding Response and Resistance to Immunotherapy.

Authors:  David A Braun; Kelly P Burke; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Cowpea Mosaic Virus Nanoparticles and Empty Virus-Like Particles Show Distinct but Overlapping Immunostimulatory Properties.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Veronique Beiss; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  pH-Responsive STING-Activating DNA Nanovaccines for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Tingting Shen; Shurong Zhou; Weinan Wang; Shuibin Lin; Guizhi Zhu
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.