Literature DB >> 27280507

How Far Are Patients Willing to Travel for Gastrectomy?

Donna Marie L Alvino1, David C Chang, Joel T Adler, Abraham Noorbakhsh, Ginger Jin, John T Mullen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine travel patterns for patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer and to identify factors associated with patient decision.
BACKGROUND: Support for regionalization of complex surgery grows; however, little is known about the willingness of patients to travel for care. Furthermore, utilization of outcomes data in patients' hospital selection processes is not well understood.
METHODS: Analysis of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 1996 to 2009. Outcome measures included total distance traveled and rate of bypassing the nearest gastrectomy-performing hospitals. Multivariate analyses to identify predictors of bypassing local hospitals were performed.
RESULTS: Total study population was 10,022. Majority (67.1%) of patients underwent gastrectomy at the nearest providing hospitals. Distance traveled to destination hospitals in California averaged 17.04 miles. Bypassing patients traveled approximately 16 miles beyond the nearest hospitals to receive care, selecting lower volume destination hospitals in 27.9% of cases. Annual gastrectomy volumes for nearest and for destination hospitals averaged 4.4 and 6.8 cases, respectively, and inhospital mortality rates were 5.9% and 4.8%, respectively. A few patients (19.2%) sought care at teaching hospitals. Rural county residence significantly reduced the likelihood of bypass (P < 0.001). High volume (>7 cases) and teaching status of destination hospitals (both P < 0.001) were predictive of hospital bypass, though no significant association between mortality rate and bypass was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of gastric cancer patients underwent gastrectomy at providing hospitals nearest to home, reflecting little regionalization of gastrectomy in California. Patients' hospital selection appears not to be driven by outcomes data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27280507     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Potential Consequences of Minimum-Volume Standards for Hospitals Treating Women With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Geographic Distribution of Adult Inpatient Surgery Capability in the USA.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Anna Schoenbrunner; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Regionalization of esophagectomy: where are we now?

Authors:  James M Clark; Daniel J Boffa; Robert A Meguid; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Using spatially adaptive floating catchments to measure the geographic availability of a health care service: Pulmonary rehabilitation in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Kevin A Matthews; Anne H Gaglioti; James B Holt; Anne G Wheaton; Janet B Croft
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Evaluating Dissemination of Adequate Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer in the USA.

Authors:  Anthony M Villano; Alexander Zeymo; James McDermott; Andrew Crocker; Jay Zeck; Kitty S Chan; Nawar Shara; Sunnie Kim; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Association of Neighborhood Characteristics with Utilization of High-Volume Hospitals Among Patients Undergoing High-Risk Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Daniel Chavarin; Anghela Z Paredes; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Geographic impact on access to care and survival for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Elliott K Yee; Natalie G Coburn; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Ying Liu; Vaibhav Gupta; Gail Darling; Julie Hallet
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Willingness to Travel for Cellular Therapy: The Influence of Follow-Up Care Location, Oncologist Continuity, and Race.

Authors:  Zachary A K Frosch; Esin C Namoglu; Nandita Mitra; Daniel J Landsburg; Sunita D Nasta; Justin E Bekelman; Raghuram Iyengar; Carmen E Guerra; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-15

10.  Disparities in major surgery for esophagogastric cancer among hospitals by case volume.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Sumana Narayanan; Kristopher Attwood; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar; Steven Nurkin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.