Literature DB >> 27279547

Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone.

Kang-Mi Pang1, In-Woong Um2, Young-Kyun Kim3, Jae-Man Woo4, Soung-Min Kim4, Jong-Ho Lee4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss® , Geistlich, Switzerland) in post-extraction alveolar bone augmentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 graft sites in 24 patients were included in this study. AutoBT was used in 21 sites of 15 patients and Bio-Oss® was used in 12 sites of 9 patients for alveolar bone augmentation 2-4 weeks after dental extraction. Vertical dimension of grafted bone was measured both at the time of graft placement and at implant fixture placement after 6 months. Trephine cores were harvested for the histomorphometric evaluations during implant placement when feasible. The primary stability of implant fixture was also measured.
RESULTS: Infection of graft material or graft bed was not observed and graft sites healed without any notable complications in both groups. The vertical dimensions of alveolar bone increased by 5.38 ± 2.65 mm in AutoBT group and 6.56 ± 3.54 mm in Bio-Oss® group at 6 months post-extraction. Histomorphometrically, new bone formation of AutoBT-grafted site was 31.24 ± 13.87% while that of Bio-Oss® was 35.00 ± 19.33%. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants placed in AutoBT-grafted sites measured 72.80 ± 10.81 while those placed in Bio-Oss® -grafted sites measured 70.0 ± 12.86. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements of the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth grafted to extraction sockets for the augmentation of vertical dimension was as effective as augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Both groups showed favorable wound healing, similar amount of implant stability, and histologically confirmed new bone formation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that autogenous tooth graft material is a viable option for alveolar bone augmentation following dental extraction.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; bone substitutes; clinical research; clinical trials; guided tissue regeneration; histo-pathology; host mechanisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27279547     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  22 in total

1.  Restoration of bone defects using modified heterogeneous deproteinized bone seeded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jun Li; Zeyu Huang; Liyan Chen; Xin Tang; Yue Fang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; D Sahin; R Sader; J Becker; F Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Autogenous Dentin Particulate Graft for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with and without Use of Collagen Membrane: Preliminary Histological Analysis on Humans.

Authors:  Elio Minetti; Francesco Gianfreda; Andrea Palermo; Patrizio Bollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 5.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 6.  Clinical Reference Strategy for the Selection of Treatment Materials for Maxillofacial Bone Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuxin Zhang; Xinyi Zhang; Yanli Li; Xuran Mao; Rui Liu; Yanxin Qi; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 7.  Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts.

Authors:  Shuxin Zhang; Xuehan Li; Yanxin Qi; Xiaoqian Ma; Shuzhan Qiao; HongXin Cai; Bing Cheng Zhao; Heng Bo Jiang; Eui-Seok Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 8.  Demineralized Dentin Matrix for Dental and Alveolar Bone Tissues Regeneration: An Innovative Scope Review.

Authors:  Mohammed E Grawish; Lamyaa M Grawish; Hala M Grawish; Mahmoud M Grawish; Ahmed A Holiel; Nessma Sultan; Salwa A El-Negoly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 9.  Demineralized dentin matrix scaffolds for alveolar bone engineering.

Authors:  In-Woong Um; Young-Kyun Kim; Masaharu Mitsugi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Alveolar ridge preservation with autologous particulated dentin-a case series.

Authors:  Silvio Valdec; Pavla Pasic; Alex Soltermann; Daniel Thoma; Bernd Stadlinger; Martin Rücker
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.