Literature DB >> 22345658

Single measures of performance do not reflect overall institutional quality in colorectal cancer surgery.

Alex M Almoudaris1, Elaine M Burns, Alex Bottle, Paul Aylin, Ara Darzi, Charles Vincent, Omar Faiz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate overall performance of English colorectal cancer surgical units identified as outliers for a single quality measure--30 day inhospital mortality.
DESIGN: 144,542 patients that underwent primary major colorectal cancer resection between 2000/2001 and 2007/2008 in 149 English National Health Service units were included from hospital episodes statistics. Casemix adjusted funnel plots were constructed for 30 day inhospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission within 28 days, reoperation, failure to rescue-surgical (FTR-S) and abdominoperineal excision (APE) rates. Institutional performance was evaluated across all other domains for institutions deemed outliers for 30 day mortality. Outliers were those that lay on or breached 3 SD control limits. 'Acceptable' performance was defined if units appeared under the upper 2 SD limit.
RESULTS: 5 high mortality outlier (HMO) units and 15 low mortality outlier (LMO) units were identified. Of the five HMO units, two were substandard performance outliers (ie, above 3 SD) on another metric (both on high reoperation rates). A further two HMO institutions exceeded the second but not the third SD limits for substandard performance on other outcome metrics. One of the 15 LMO units exceeded 3 SD for substandard performance (APE rate). One LMO institution exceeded the second but not the third SD control limits for high reoperation rates. Institutional mortality correlated with FTR-S and reoperations (R=0.445, p<0.001 and R=0.191, p<0.020 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Performance appraisal in colorectal surgery is complex and dependent on stakeholder perspective. Benchmarking units solely on a single performance measure is over simplistic and potentially hazardous. A global appraisal of institutional outcome is required to contextualise performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22345658     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  19 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Giacomo Ruffo; Giuliano Barugola; Roberto Rossini; Carlo Augusto Sartori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-06-09

Review 2.  Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

3.  Complications and failure to rescue following laparoscopic or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ru-Hong Tu; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; A Chiappetta; G Giacomazzo; A Barina; N Gennaro; M Rebonato; D Nitti; M Saugo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  The impact of laparoscopic versus open approach on reoperation rate after segmental colectomy: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Betty Jiang; Ricardo Pietrobon; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Readmission After Resections of the Colon and Rectum: Predictors of a Costly and Common Outcome.

Authors:  Lindsay A Bliss; Lillias H Maguire; Zeling Chau; Catherine J Yang; Deborah A Nagle; Andrew T Chan; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Assessment of Cancer Center Variation in Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Colectomy for Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Patrick J Sweigert; Emanuel Eguia; Marshall S Baker; Christina M Link; J Madison Hyer; Anghela Z Paredes; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Syed Husain; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Establishing Key Performance Indicators [KPIs] and Their Importance for the Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Results From a Pan-European, Delphi Consensus Study.

Authors:  Pritesh S Morar; James Hollingshead; Willem Bemelman; Nick Sevdalis; Thomas Pinkney; Graeme Wilson; Malcolm Dunlop; R Justin Davies; Richard Guy; Nicola Fearnhead; Steven Brown; Janindra Warusavitarne; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 9.071

9.  Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England.

Authors:  Ben E Byrne; Anna Pinto; Paul Aylin; Alex Bottle; Omar D Faiz; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-01-23

10.  Unplanned reoperation within 30 days of fusion surgery for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Jianxiong Shen; Guixing Qiu; Haiquan Yu; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Hong Zhao; Yu Zhao; Shugang Li; Xisheng Weng; Jinqian Liang; Lijuan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.