Literature DB >> 27277905

Use of strain ratio in evaluating superficial soft tissue tumors on ultrasonic elastography.

Young Han Lee1, Ho-Taek Song1, Jin-Suck Suh2.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to describe the strain ratio in histopathologically confirmed superficial soft tissue tumors using ultrasonic elastography (USE).
METHODS: From March to August 2012, 94 soft tissue tumors in 79 consecutive patients (age range 19-70 years) were examined using USE for palpable masses. Among them, 39 lesions in 36 patients were histopathologically confirmed. Thirty-four lesions in 31 patients with lipoma, ganglion, epidermal inclusion cyst, and pilomatricoma were included: 34 histopathologically confirmed mature lipomas (n = 19), ganglia (n = 6), epidermal inclusion cysts (n = 5), and pilomatricomas (n = 4). Ultrasonographic features of margins, echogenicity, walls, ultrasonic transmission, and vascular flow via Doppler ultrasonography were evaluated. The strain ratios were calculated from the USE strain measured within the lesion and in adjacent tissue. Intraclass correlation (ICC) with Cohen's kappa was used to determine intraobserver agreement, and the strain ratios of the three groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R package statistical software, and p values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS: On USE, repeated measurements of the strain ratios showed excellent intraobserver agreement [ICC value = 0.952 (CI 0.905-0.977), p < 0.05]. The strain ratios of lipomas (median ± standard error 0.83 ± 0.18) were statistically different (p < 0.05) from those of ganglia, epidermal inclusion cysts, and pilomatricomas. The strain ratios of ganglia (2.78 ± 0.48) were also statistically different (p < 0.05) from those of epidermal inclusion cysts and pilomatricomas. The strain ratios of epidermal inclusion cysts (0.17 ± 0.21) were not statistically different (p > 0.05) from that of pilomatricomas (0.13 ± 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Strain ratios determined by USE help to differentiate lipomas and ganglia from other superficial soft tissue tumors. Our results suggest that USE could be used in addition to traditional ultrasound techniques to obtain diagnostic clues in the evaluation of superficial soft tissue tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Soft tissue tumor; Strain ratio; Ultrasound; Ultrasound elastography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 27277905     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-014-0528-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  16 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis of small single solid thyroid nodules using real-time ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Y Wang; H-J Dan; H-Y Dan; T Li; B Hu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.

Authors:  Ji Hye Lee; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Jae Jeong Choi; Seung Hee Jeong; Hyeon Woo Yim; Byung Joo Song
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

4.  Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Sung Hee Park; Soo Jin Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Eun Ju Son; Jin Young Kwak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Sonography of benign palpable masses of the elbow.

Authors:  Jee Young Lee; Sung Moon Kim; David P Fessell; Jon A Jacobson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules.

Authors:  Chun-Ping Ning; Shuang-Quan Jiang; Tao Zhang; Li-tao Sun; Yu-Jie Liu; Jia-Wei Tian
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Kemal Arda; Nazan Ciledag; Elif Aktas; Bilgin Kadri Aribas; Kenan Köse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.

Authors:  B S Garra; E I Cespedes; J Ophir; S R Spratt; R A Zuurbier; C M Magnant; M F Pennanen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Color Doppler ultrasonography of soft-tissue masses.

Authors:  R Lagalla; A Iovane; G Caruso; M Lo Bello; L E Derchi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 10.  State-of-the-art HR-US imaging findings of the most frequent musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Andreas Riedl; Daniel Schoepf; Bernhard Glodny; Siegfried Peer; Hannes Gruber
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinction between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors based on an ultrasonographic evaluation of vascularity and elasticity.

Authors:  Shusa Ohshika; Tatsuro Saruga; Tetsuya Ogawa; Hiroya Ono; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.