Literature DB >> 27277211

Effect of high or low protamine dosing on postoperative bleeding following heparin anticoagulation in cardiac surgery. A randomised clinical trial.

Michael I Meesters, Dennis Veerhoek, Fellery de Lange, Jacob-Willem de Vries, Jan R de Jong, Johannes W A Romijn, Hilde Kelchtermans, Dana Huskens, Robin van der Steeg, Pepijn W A Thomas, David T M Burtman, Laurentius J M van Barneveld, Alexander B A Vonk, Christa Boer1.   

Abstract

While experimental data state that protamine exerts intrinsic anticoagulation effects, protamine is still frequently overdosed for heparin neutralisation during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Since comparative studies are lacking, we assessed the influence of two protamine-to-heparin dosing ratios on perioperative haemostasis and bleeding, and hypothesised that protamine overdosing impairs the coagulation status following cardiac surgery. In this open-label, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery were assigned to a low (0.8; n=49) or high (1.3; n=47) protamine-to-heparin dosing group. The primary outcome was 24-hour blood loss. Patient haemostasis was monitored using rotational thromboelastometry and a thrombin generation assay. The low protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio group received less protamine (329 ± 95 vs 539 ± 117 mg; p<0.001), while post-protamine activated clotting times were similar among groups. The high dosing group revealed increased intrinsic clotting times (236 ± 74 vs 196 ± 64 s; p=0.006) and the maximum post-protamine thrombin generation was less suppressed in the low dosing group (38 ± 40 % vs 6 ± 9 %; p=0.001). Postoperative blood loss was increased in the high dosing ratio group (615 ml; 95 % CI 500-830 ml vs 470 ml; 95 % CI 420-530 ml; p=0.021) when compared to the low dosing group, respectively. More patients in the high dosing group received fresh frozen plasma (11 % vs 0 %; p=0.02) and platelet concentrate (21 % vs 6 %; p=0.04) compared to the low dosing group. Our study confirms in vitro data that abundant protamine dosing is associated with increased postoperative blood loss and higher transfusion rates in cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heparins; blood products; coagulation factors; surgery; thrombin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27277211     DOI: 10.1160/TH16-02-0117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  8 in total

1.  Identifying optimal heparin management during cardiopulmonary bypass in Chinese people: a retrospective observational comparative study.

Authors:  Yongbo Gan; Zhijian Yang; Wei Mei; Chang Zhu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Are We Able to Dose Protamine Accurately Yet? A Review of the Protamine Conundrum.

Authors:  Patrick Hecht; Martin Besser; Florian Falter
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-03

3.  Can the Minimum Protamine Dose to Neutralize Heparin at the Completion of Cardiopulmonary Bypass be Significantly Lower than the Conventional Practice?

Authors:  Min-Ho Lee; William Riley; Kenneth G Shann
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-09

Review 4.  Anticoagulation Strategies in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Weight-Based vs. Concentration-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Justine Harnish; Kevin Beyer; Julie Collins
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2022-06

5.  Low molecular weight heparin in surgical valve procedures: When and how much for an optimal prophylaxis?

Authors:  Katarzyna Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz; Marek Cisowski; Andrzej Bochenek; Piotr Buszman; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Kunik; Magdalena Mularska; Krzysztof Kocot; Piotr Politowski; Jakub Brączkowski; Agata Trznadel; Michael S Aboodi; Paweł Buszman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.737

6.  The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management.

Authors:  Klaus Görlinger; Antonio Pérez-Ferrer; Daniel Dirkmann; Fuat Saner; Marc Maegele; Ángel Augusto Pérez Calatayud; Tae-Yop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-05-17

7.  Point-of-care measurement of activated clotting time for cardiac surgery as measured by the Hemochron signature elite and the Abbott i-STAT: agreement, concordance, and clinical reliability.

Authors:  Daniel Dirkmann; Elisabeth Nagy; Martin W Britten; Jürgen Peters
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Is There a "Blind Spot" in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Saskia Wand; Daniel Heise; Nadine Hillmann; Christian Bireta; Anselm Bräuer; Nicolas von Ahsen; Michael Quintel
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.