Andrej Steyer1, Monika Jevšnik, Miroslav Petrovec, Marko Pokorn, Štefan Grosek, Adela Fratnik Steyer, Barbara Šoba, Tina Uršič, Tjaša Cerar Kišek, Marko Kolenc, Marija Trkov, Petra Šparl, Raja Duraisamy, W Ian Lipkin, Sara Terzić, Mojca Kolnik, Tatjana Mrvič, Amit Kapoor, Franc Strle. 1. *Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; †Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; ‡Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; §Department for Public Health Microbiology, Centre for Medical Microbiology, National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Ljubljana, Slovenia; ¶Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia; ‖Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; and **The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Twenty-five percent to 50% of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) cases remain etiologically undiagnosed. Our main aim was to determine the most appropriate list of enteric pathogens to be included in the daily diagnostics scheme of AGE, ensuring the lowest possible diagnostic gap. METHODS: Two hundred ninety seven children ≤6 years of age, admitted to hospital in Slovenia, October 2011 to October 2012, with AGE, and 88 ≤6 years old healthy children were included in the study. A broad spectrum of enteric pathogens was targeted with molecular methods, including 8 viruses, 6 bacteria and 2 parasites. RESULTS: At least one enteric pathogen was detected in 91.2% of cases with AGE and 27.3% of controls. Viruses were the most prevalent (82.5% and 15.9%), followed by bacteria (27.3% and 10.2%) and parasites (3.0% and 1.1%) in cases and controls, respectively. A high proportion (41.8%) of mixed infections was observed in the cases. For cases with undetermined etiology (8.8%), stool samples were analyzed with next generation sequencing, and a potential viral pathogen was detected in 17 additional samples (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that tests for rotaviruses, noroviruses genogroup II, adenoviruses 40/41, astroviruses, Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella sp. should be included in the initial diagnostic algorithm, which revealed the etiology in 83.5% of children tested. The use of molecular methods in diagnostics of gastroenteritis is preferable because of their high sensitivity, specificity, fast performance and the possibility of establishing the concentration of the target. The latter may be valuable for assessing the clinical significance of the detected enteric, particularly viral pathogens.
BACKGROUND: Twenty-five percent to 50% of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) cases remain etiologically undiagnosed. Our main aim was to determine the most appropriate list of enteric pathogens to be included in the daily diagnostics scheme of AGE, ensuring the lowest possible diagnostic gap. METHODS: Two hundred ninety seven children ≤6 years of age, admitted to hospital in Slovenia, October 2011 to October 2012, with AGE, and 88 ≤6 years old healthy children were included in the study. A broad spectrum of enteric pathogens was targeted with molecular methods, including 8 viruses, 6 bacteria and 2 parasites. RESULTS: At least one enteric pathogen was detected in 91.2% of cases with AGE and 27.3% of controls. Viruses were the most prevalent (82.5% and 15.9%), followed by bacteria (27.3% and 10.2%) and parasites (3.0% and 1.1%) in cases and controls, respectively. A high proportion (41.8%) of mixed infections was observed in the cases. For cases with undetermined etiology (8.8%), stool samples were analyzed with next generation sequencing, and a potential viral pathogen was detected in 17 additional samples (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that tests for rotaviruses, noroviruses genogroup II, adenoviruses 40/41, astroviruses, Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella sp. should be included in the initial diagnostic algorithm, which revealed the etiology in 83.5% of children tested. The use of molecular methods in diagnostics of gastroenteritis is preferable because of their high sensitivity, specificity, fast performance and the possibility of establishing the concentration of the target. The latter may be valuable for assessing the clinical significance of the detected enteric, particularly viral pathogens.
Authors: M Lorrot; F Bon; M J El Hajje; S Aho; M Wolfer; H Giraudon; J Kaplon; E Marc; J Raymond; P Lebon; P Pothier; D Gendrel Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Marije van Leeuwen; Marisol M W Williams; Penelope Koraka; James H Simon; Saskia L Smits; Albert D M E Osterhaus Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Tung Gia Phan; Johan Nordgren; Djeneba Ouermi; Jacques Simpore; Leon W Nitiema; Xutao Deng; Eric Delwart Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321