Ming-Ming Liu1, Jia-Man Dai1, Wen-Yi Liu1, Cong-Jian Zhao1, Bin Lin2, Zheng-Qin Yin1. 1. Southwest Hospital, Southwest Eye Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China; Key Lab of Visual Damage and Regeneration and Restoration of Chongqing, Chongqing 400038, China. 2. Departments of Anatomy and Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 200131, China.
Abstract
AIM: To explore whether ectopic expression of human melanopsin can effectively and safely restore visual function in rd1 mice. METHODS: Hematoxylin-eosin staining of retinal sections from rd1 mice was used to detect the thickness of the outer nuclear layer to determine the timing of surgery. We constructed a human melanopsin-AAV2/8 viral vector and injected it into the subretinal space of rd1 mice. The Phoenix Micron IV system was used to exclude the aborted injections, and immunohistochemistry was used to validate the ectopic expression of human melanopsin. Furthermore, visual electrophysiology and behavioral tests were used to detect visual function 30 and 45d after the injection. The structure of the retina was compared between the human melanopsin-injected group and phosphate buffer saline (PBS)-injected group. RESULTS: Retinas of rd1 mice lost almost all of their photoreceptors on postnatal day 28 (P28). We therefore injected the human melanopsin-adeno-associated virus (AAV) 2/8 viral vector into P30 rd1 mice. After excluding aborted injections, we used immunohistochemistry of the whole mount retina to confirm the ectopic expression of human melanopsin by co-expression of human melanopsin and YFP that was carried by a viral vector. At 30d post-injection, visual electrophysiology and the behavioral test significantly improved. However, restoration of vision disappeared 45d after human melanopsin injection. Notably, human melanopsin-injected mice did not show any structural differences in their retinas compared with PBS-injected mice. CONCLUSION: Ectopic expression of human melanopsin effectively and safely restores visual function in rd1 mice.
AIM: To explore whether ectopic expression of humanmelanopsin can effectively and safely restore visual function in rd1mice. METHODS:Hematoxylin-eosin staining of retinal sections from rd1mice was used to detect the thickness of the outer nuclear layer to determine the timing of surgery. We constructed a humanmelanopsin-AAV2/8 viral vector and injected it into the subretinal space of rd1mice. The Phoenix Micron IV system was used to exclude the aborted injections, and immunohistochemistry was used to validate the ectopic expression of humanmelanopsin. Furthermore, visual electrophysiology and behavioral tests were used to detect visual function 30 and 45d after the injection. The structure of the retina was compared between the humanmelanopsin-injected group and phosphate buffer saline (PBS)-injected group. RESULTS: Retinas of rd1mice lost almost all of their photoreceptors on postnatal day 28 (P28). We therefore injected the humanmelanopsin-adeno-associated virus (AAV) 2/8 viral vector into P30 rd1mice. After excluding aborted injections, we used immunohistochemistry of the whole mount retina to confirm the ectopic expression of humanmelanopsin by co-expression of humanmelanopsin and YFP that was carried by a viral vector. At 30d post-injection, visual electrophysiology and the behavioral test significantly improved. However, restoration of vision disappeared 45d after humanmelanopsin injection. Notably, humanmelanopsin-injected mice did not show any structural differences in their retinas compared with PBS-injected mice. CONCLUSION: Ectopic expression of humanmelanopsin effectively and safely restores visual function in rd1mice.
Entities:
Keywords:
human melanopsin; retinal degenerative diseases; visual restoration
Authors: Kathryn A Roecklein; Patricia M Wong; Megan A Miller; Shannon D Donofry; Marissa L Kamarck; George C Brainard Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Bin Lin; Amane Koizumi; Nobushige Tanaka; Satchidananda Panda; Richard H Masland Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: B Ameline; K-T Tshilenge; M Weber; M Biget; L Libeau; R Caplette; A Mendes-Madeira; N Provost; C Guihal; S Picaud; P Moullier; V Pichard; T Cronin; C Isiegas Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Michelle E McClements; Federica Staurenghi; Robert E MacLaren; Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Michael J Gilhooley; Moritz Lindner; Teele Palumaa; Steven Hughes; Stuart N Peirson; Mark W Hankins Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 6.698