Literature DB >> 27274934

Measurement of 100 nm and 60 nm Particle Standards by Differential Mobility Analysis.

George W Mulholland1, Michelle K Donnelly1, Charles R Hagwood1, Scott R Kukuck1, Vincent A Hackley1, David Y H Pui2.   

Abstract

The peak particle size and expanded uncertainties (95 % confidence interval) for two new particle calibration standards are measured as 101.8 nm ± 1.1 nm and 60.39 nm ± 0.63 nm. The particle samples are polystyrene spheres suspended in filtered, deionized water at a mass fraction of about 0.5 %. The size distribution measurements of aerosolized particles are made using a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) system calibrated using SRM(®) 1963 (100.7 nm polystyrene spheres). An electrospray aerosol generator was used for generating the 60 nm aerosol to almost eliminate the generation of multiply charged dimers and trimers and to minimize the effect of non-volatile contaminants increasing the particle size. The testing for the homogeneity of the samples and for the presence of multimers using dynamic light scattering is described. The use of the transfer function integral in the calibration of the DMA is shown to reduce the uncertainty in the measurement of the peak particle size compared to the approach based on the peak in the concentration vs. voltage distribution. A modified aerosol/sheath inlet, recirculating sheath flow, a high ratio of sheath flow to the aerosol flow, and accurate pressure, temperature, and voltage measurements have increased the resolution and accuracy of the measurements. A significant consideration in the uncertainty analysis was the correlation between the slip correction of the calibration particle and the measured particle. Including the correlation reduced the expanded uncertainty from approximately 1.8 % of the particle size to about 1.0 %. The effect of non-volatile contaminants in the polystyrene suspensions on the peak particle size and the uncertainty in the size is determined. The full size distributions for both the 60 nm and 100 nm spheres are tabulated and selected mean sizes including the number mean diameter and the dynamic light scattering mean diameter are computed. The use of these particles for calibrating DMAs and for making deposition standards to be used with surface scanning inspection systems is discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differential mobility analysis; dynamic light scattering; electrical mobility; electrospray aerosol generation; particle size calibration standards; transfer function

Year:  2006        PMID: 27274934      PMCID: PMC4659453          DOI: 10.6028/jres.111.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol        ISSN: 1044-677X


  4 in total

1.  Revisiting the method of cumulants for the analysis of dynamic light-scattering data.

Authors:  B J Frisken
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2001-08-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Submicrometer Particle Sizing by Multiangle Light Scattering following Fractionation

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Slip Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83.

Authors:  Jung Hyeun Kim; George W Mulholland; Scott R Kukuck; David Y H Pui
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2005-02-01

4.  Use of the Electrostatic Classification Method to Size 0.1 μm SRM Particles-A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Patrick D Kinney; David Y H Pui; George W Mulliolland; Nelson P Bryner
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of a multi-purpose large animal exposure chamber for investigating health effects.

Authors:  Xinze Peng; Mia R Maltz; Jon K Botthoff; Emma L Aronson; Tara M Nordgren; David D Lo; David R Cocker
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Volume determination of irregularly-shaped quasi-spherical nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Attota; Eileen Cherry Liu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Comparison of Real Time Nanoparticle Monitoring Instruments in the Workplaces.

Authors:  Seunghon Ham; Naroo Lee; Igchun Eom; Byoungcheun Lee; Perng-Jy Tsai; Kiyoung Lee; Chungsik Yoon
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-08-26

4.  Evaluation of electrospray differential mobility analysis for virus particle analysis: Potential applications for biomanufacturing.

Authors:  Suvajyoti Guha; Leonard F Pease; Kurt A Brorson; Michael J Tarlov; Michael R Zachariah
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Continuous Inhalation Exposure to Fungal Allergen Particulates Induces Lung Inflammation While Reducing Innate Immune Molecule Expression in the Brainstem.

Authors:  Xinze Peng; Abdullah M Madany; Jessica C Jang; Joseph M Valdez; Zuivanna Rivas; Abigail C Burr; Yelena Y Grinberg; Tara M Nordgren; Meera G Nair; David Cocker; Monica J Carson; David D Lo
Journal:  ASN Neuro       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.146

Review 6.  Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements.

Authors:  Valérie Gabelica; Alexandre A Shvartsburg; Carlos Afonso; Perdita Barran; Justin L P Benesch; Christian Bleiholder; Michael T Bowers; Aivett Bilbao; Matthew F Bush; J Larry Campbell; Iain D G Campuzano; Tim Causon; Brian H Clowers; Colin S Creaser; Edwin De Pauw; Johann Far; Francisco Fernandez-Lima; John C Fjeldsted; Kevin Giles; Michael Groessl; Christopher J Hogan; Stephan Hann; Hugh I Kim; Ruwan T Kurulugama; Jody C May; John A McLean; Kevin Pagel; Keith Richardson; Mark E Ridgeway; Frédéric Rosu; Frank Sobott; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Stephen J Valentine; Thomas Wyttenbach
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.946

7.  Detection of Airborne Nanoparticles through Enhanced Light Scattering Images.

Authors:  Yan Ye; Qisheng Ou; Weiqi Chen; Qingfeng Cao; Dong-Bin Kwak; Thomas Kuehn; David Y H Pui
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.