Literature DB >> 27274616

Interplay of Orbital and Relativistic Effects in Bismuth Oxyhalides: BiOF, BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI.

Alex M Ganose1, Madeleine Cuff2, Keith T Butler3, Aron Walsh4, David O Scanlon1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274616      PMCID: PMC4887134          DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Mater        ISSN: 0897-4756            Impact factor:   9.811


× No keyword cloud information.
The optoelectronic properties of bismuth oxyhalides have led to their utility in applications such as pigments in the cosmetics industry,[1,2] pharmaceuticals,[3,4] phosphors,[5] gas sensors,[6] and catalysis.[7,8] Over the past decade, interest in this family of materials has rapidly increased, fuelled by reports of their excellent photocatalytic activity.[9−16] They have been studied as stand-alone photocatalysts,[9,10,17] quaternary alloys,[18,19] and interfaced with other photocatalytically active materials.[20−22] To date, however, an understanding of the chemical trends underpinning these successes is lacking. The BiOX series, shown in Figure , crystallize in the tetragonal Matlockite structure,[23,24] which can be considered the simplest form of the Sillén-type structure and is commonly expressed as [M2O2][X].[25] The crystal lattice consists of fluorite-like [M2O2] layers sandwiched between double halide [X] layers, to form [X–Bi–O–Bi–X] sheets, stacked in the [001] direction, with the structure held together by nonbonding van der Waals interactions along the [001] direction. It has been proposed that this structure type imparts an internal static electric field between the [M2O2]2+ and double [X]− slab along the [001] direction, which aids efficient separation of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs.[9,10,26,27]
Figure 1

Crystal structure of the BiOX systems (space group P4/nmm, D4 symmetry) with stoichiometric X–Bi–O–Bi–X bilayers stacked along the c axis.

Crystal structure of the BiOX systems (space group P4/nmm, D4 symmetry) with stoichiometric X–Bi–O–Bi–X bilayers stacked along the c axis. In this communication, we investigate the BiOX (X = F, Cl, Br, and I) series using hybrid density functional theory with explicit treatment of spin–orbit coupling effects and dispersion interactions. First, we resolve the band gap trends, where values between 3.5–3.6 eV, 2.9–3.4 eV, 2.3–2.9 eV, and 1.8–2.1 eV for BiOF, BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI, had been reported.[9,11,12,28−32] We separate the roles of relativistic and chemical effects in determining the magnitude of the gaps and also the absolute band energies, which provides guidance for designing tailored photocatalysts. First-principles calculations were performed in the framework of density functional theory (DFT). Special attention was paid to electron–electron interactions (using the screened hybrid HSE06 functional),[33,34] relativistic effects (using scalar relativistic PAW pseudopotentials[35,36] and spin–orbit coupling, SOC), and dispersion interactions (the DFT-D3 correction[37,38]). All solid-state calculations were performed in a plane-wave basis set using the code VASP.[39,40] Complete structural optimizations (forces < 0.01 eV Å–1) were performed at a series of volumes in order to calculate the equilibrium lattice parameters. Convergence with respect to k-point sampling and plane wave energy was checked, with a cutoff of 520 eV and a k-point density of 0.04 k Å found to be sufficient. To align the electronic band energies to the vacuum level, a surface–slab model (15 Å vacuum spacing) was constructed and the corresponding electrostatic potential averaged along the c-direction, using the MacroDensity package.[41−43] The (100) surface was chosen as it is a nonpolar termination that results in minimal bond cleavage and does not produce undesirable surface states. The predicted lattice parameters for the BiOX series are shown in Table . The results are in good agreement with previous experimental measurements (within 1%),[11,23,24] taking into account that the experimental data is mostly for room temperature. The inclusion of the nonlocal dispersion correction was vital for achieving an accurate equilibrium geometry, especially as we descend down the halide group, as shown in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. Without this interaction, the error in the c parameter can grow to as much as 1 Å.
Table 1

Calculated Structural and Electronic Properties of the BiOX Seriesa

materialacEgIPEA
BiOF3.72 (−1.0%)6.20 (−0.5%)4.188.233.87
BiOCl3.87 (−0.5%)7.42 (+0.9%)3.377.944.35
BiOBr3.90 (−0.5%)8.14 (−0.5%)2.827.554.65
BiOI3.98 (−0.3%)9.15 (0.0%)2.007.035.03

All lattice vectors are given in Å (% error with respect to room temperature diffraction measurements in parentheses), with the band gap, ionisation potential (IP), and electron affinity (EA) in eV.

All lattice vectors are given in Å (% error with respect to room temperature diffraction measurements in parentheses), with the band gap, ionisation potential (IP), and electron affinity (EA) in eV. Similar to the hybrid halide perovskites[44−46] and topological insulators[47,48] which are also composed of atoms with high atomic number, it is expected that relativistic effects should play a large role in determining the electronic structure of these materials. The band structures of the BiOX series with and without the explicit treatment of SOC are plotted in Figure a–d. The inclusion of SOC was found to result in a net band gap reduction independent of chemical composition, with the conduction band minimum (CBM) of BiOF, BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI lowered by 0.39, 0.24, 0.24, and 0.22 eV, respectively. The valence band maximum (VBM) is less affected by SOC effects, with only BiOI experiencing a significant upward shift of 0.11 eV, due to larger relativistic effect on I states as group 17 is descended. As such, the effect of SOC is insufficient in explaining the trend in band gap across the series.
Figure 2

Scalar relativistic (dashed lines) and fully relativistic (black lines) electronic band structures of the BiOX series with the hybrid HSE06 functional. The highest occupied state (including spin–orbit coupling) is set to 0 eV.

Scalar relativistic (dashed lines) and fully relativistic (black lines) electronic band structures of the BiOX series with the hybrid HSE06 functional. The highest occupied state (including spin–orbit coupling) is set to 0 eV. Instead, analysis of the total and partial (ion decomposed) density of states for the BiOX series, shown in Figure , is instructive in explaining the trend in optical response seen in experiment. For BiOF, the top of the valence band is dominated by O 2p states, with the F 2p states found at higher binding energies. As the halide anion changes upon moving down group 17, the contribution of the halide p states to the VBM increases, ultimately dominating the VBM in BiOI. In all cases, the conduction band is dominated by Bi p states. It is therefore clear that the valence band composition dictates the band gap reduction down the series, in line with the binding energy of the halide p orbitals. The Bi 6s states are mainly found at the bottom of the valence band but additionally provide a small contribution toward the top of the valence band. Consistent with the revised lone pair theory,[49−51] the orbital overlap * of Bi 6s* with the O 2p and halide p states is not sufficient to warrant a structural distortion, meaning the Bi is perfectly octahedral in the Matlockite structure.
Figure 3

Fully relativistic (HSE06+SOC) electronic density of states (DOS), including projections onto ion-centered atomic orbitals (PEDOS). The highest occupied state is set to 0 eV.

Fully relativistic (HSE06+SOC) electronic density of states (DOS), including projections onto ion-centered atomic orbitals (PEDOS). The highest occupied state is set to 0 eV. From the band structures shown in Figure it can be seen that the fundamental band gaps across the BiOX series are indirect. The CBM of BiOF, BiOCl, and BiOBr appears at the Z point, with the VBM positioned between Z → R. For BiOI, the CBM is situated between Γ → R, and the VBM is again situated between Z → R. The fundamental indirect band gaps are 4.18, 3.37, 2.82, and 2.00 eV for BiOF, BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI, respectively, which, in all cases except BiOF, are in excellent agreement with experimental measurements.[12] The calculated hole effective masses are relatively large; however, they are considerably smaller in BiOCl and BiOBr (0.8 m and 0.7 m) than in BiOF and BiOI (12.5 me and 1.9 me). The dispersion of the conduction band is noticeably less along Z → Γ (in the [001] direction) compared to Z → R ([010]), which is to be expected as Z → Γ spans across the [X–Bi–O–Bi–X] sheets, whereas Z → R is in the plane of the layers. This is reflected in the electron effective masses of BiOF, BiOCl, and BiOBr, which are significantly lower in the Z → Γ direction (0.5 me, 0.3 me, and 0.3 me, respectively) than along Z → R (1.0 me, 2.4 me, and 0.6 me, respectively). To understand the effect of varying the halide ion on the fundamental band alignments of the BiOX series, we have plotted the valence band alignment of these materials using the slab model,[52] with the results shown in Figure . As expected based on the relative energy levels of the halide p-orbitals, the ionization potential (IP) of the BiOX series gets smaller as we descend down group 17. The Bi-based conduction band is also lowered on descending group 17, which can be rationalized due to the Bi p states experiencing a different Madelung potential as the ionic radius of the halide increases on moving down the group.
Figure 4

Calculated valence band alignment of the BiOX series (HSE including spin–orbit coupling). The vacuum level was aligned to the (001) surface in a slab calculation with a vacuum thickness of 15 Å. The electrostatic potentials were aligned and checked using the package MacroDensity.[53]

Calculated valence band alignment of the BiOX series (HSE including spin–orbit coupling). The vacuum level was aligned to the (001) surface in a slab calculation with a vacuum thickness of 15 Å. The electrostatic potentials were aligned and checked using the package MacroDensity.[53] The alignment helps to explain some of the puzzling experimental observations in the literature. The BiOX series have been reported to display p-type conductivity[15] but unusually to also exhibit n-type behavior.[54] Our calculated electron affinity (EA) for BiOI of 5.2 eV is consistent with the EAs exhibited by many excellent n-type materials.[55−57] The larger EA of BiOI also results in a reduced overpotential for O2/oxygen anion splitting and can explain why BiOI is not as active for the degradation of rhodamine B than BiOBr and BiOCl.[12,58] In addition alloys between BiOCl/BiOBr[59] and BiOBr/BiOI[60] have been demonstrated to outperform the individual materials, and this can be rationalized by the ability to tailor the band edges in order to obtain an enhanced electronic alignment in the alloys. We have demonstrated the key role of the halide anion in determining the electronic structure and properties of the bismuth oxyhalide series. The range of functionality will be further extended by also changing the chalcogenide anion, as suggested by recent reports of topological electronic states and relativistic band splitting in the bismuth tellurihalides. As such, this extended family of compounds merits further investigation.
  21 in total

1.  Angle-Dependent Optical Effects Deriving from Submicron Structures of Films and Pigments.

Authors:  Gerhard Pfaff; Peter Reynders
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-07-14       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-05-15

3.  Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Krukau; Oleg A Vydrov; Artur F Izmaylov; Gustavo E Scuseria
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Projector augmented-wave method.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-12-15

5.  Controlled hydrothermal synthesis of bismuth oxyhalide nanobelts and nanotubes.

Authors:  Hong Deng; Junwei Wang; Qing Peng; Xun Wang; Yadong Li
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Spray pyrolysis deposition and photoelectrochemical properties of n-type BiOI nanoplatelet thin films.

Authors:  Nathan T Hahn; Son Hoang; Jeffrey L Self; C Buddie Mullins
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Prediction of electron energies in metal oxides.

Authors:  Aron Walsh; Keith T Butler
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  Bismuth oxyhalide nanomaterials: layered structures meet photocatalysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Ying Yu; Lizhi Zhang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Electronic chemical potentials of porous metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Keith T Butler; Christopher H Hendon; Aron Walsh
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Jarvist M Frost; Keith T Butler; Federico Brivio; Christopher H Hendon; Mark van Schilfgaarde; Aron Walsh
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  15 in total

1.  The synthesis of a BiOCl x Br1-x nanostructure photocatalyst with high surface area for the enhanced visible-light photocatalytic reduction of Cr(vi).

Authors:  Muhammad Bilal Hussain; Malik Saddam Khan; Herman Maloko Loussala; Muhammad Sohail Bashir
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.361

2.  A single-source precursor approach to solution processed indium arsenide thin films.

Authors:  Peter Marchand; Sanjayan Sathasivam; Benjamin A D Williamson; David Pugh; Salem M Bawaked; Sulaiman N Basahel; Abdullah Y Obaid; David O Scanlon; Ivan P Parkin; Claire J Carmalt
Journal:  J Mater Chem C Mater       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.393

3.  Defect Engineering of Earth-Abundant Solar Absorbers BiSI and BiSeI.

Authors:  Alex M Ganose; Saya Matsumoto; John Buckeridge; David O Scanlon
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 9.811

4.  Ag₂CO₃ Decorating BiOCOOH Microspheres with Enhanced Full-Spectrum Photocatalytic Activity for the Degradation of Toxic Pollutants.

Authors:  Shijie Li; Liuye Mo; Yanping Liu; Huiqiu Zhang; Yaming Ge; Yingtang Zhou
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Facile Fabrication of Flower-Like BiOI/BiOCOOH p-n Heterojunctions for Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Removal of Harmful Antibiotics.

Authors:  Shijie Li; Bing Xue; Chunchun Wang; Wei Jiang; Shiwei Hu; Yanping Liu; Hengwei Wang; Jianshe Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Synthesis of bismuth oxyhalide (BiOBr zI (1- z)) solid solutions for photodegradation of methylene blue dye.

Authors:  Robert O Gembo; Ochieng Aoyi; Stephen Majoni; Anita Etale; Sebusi Odisitse; Cecil K King'ondu
Journal:  AAS Open Res       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Ca4Sb2O and Ca4Bi2O: two promising mixed-anion thermoelectrics.

Authors:  Warda Rahim; Jonathan M Skelton; David O Scanlon
Journal:  J Mater Chem A Mater       Date:  2021-08-02

8.  Modulation of the Bi3+ 6s2 Lone Pair State in Perovskites for High-Mobility p-Type Oxide Semiconductors.

Authors:  Jueli Shi; Ethan A Rubinstein; Weiwei Li; Jiaye Zhang; Ye Yang; Tien-Lin Lee; Changdong Qin; Pengfei Yan; Judith L MacManus-Driscoll; David O Scanlon; Kelvin H L Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.806

9.  Mechanism of diastereoisomer-induced chirality of BiOBr.

Authors:  Kun Ding; Jing Ai; Yingying Duan; Lu Han; Zhibei Qu; Shunai Che
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Room temperature synthesis of BiOBr1-x I x thin films with tunable structure and conductivity type for enhanced photoelectric performance.

Authors:  Huimin Jia; Yuxing Li; Yuanyang Mao; Dufei Yu; Weiwei He; Zhi Zheng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.