Literature DB >> 27273479

Urinary excretions of 34 dietary polyphenols and their associations with lifestyle factors in the EPIC cohort study.

Raul Zamora-Ros1,2, David Achaintre1, Joseph A Rothwell1, Sabina Rinaldi1, Nada Assi1, Pietro Ferrari1, Michael Leitzmann1, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault3, Guy Fagherazzi3, Aurélie Auffret3, Tilman Kühn4, Verena Katzke4, Heiner Boeing5, Antonia Trichopoulou6,7, Androniki Naska6,7, Effie Vasilopoulou7, Domenico Palli8, Sara Grioni9, Amalia Mattiello10, Rosario Tumino11, Fulvio Ricceri12, Nadia Slimani1, Isabelle Romieu1, Augustin Scalbert1.   

Abstract

Urinary excretion of 34 dietary polyphenols and their variations according to diet and other lifestyle factors were measured by tandem mass spectrometry in 475 adult participants from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cross-sectional study. A single 24-hour urine sample was analysed for each subject from 4 European countries. The highest median levels were observed for phenolic acids such as 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (157 μmol/24 h), followed by 3-hydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic, vanillic and homovanillic acids (20-50 μmol/24 h). The lowest concentrations were observed for equol, apigenin and resveratrol (<0.1 μmol/24 h). Urinary polyphenols significantly varied by centre, followed by alcohol intake, sex, educational level, and energy intake. This variability is largely explained by geographical variations in the diet, as suggested by the high correlations (r > 0.5) observed between urinary polyphenols and the intake of their main food sources (e.g., resveratrol and gallic acid ethyl ester with red wine intake; caffeic, protocatechuic and ferulic acids with coffee consumption; and hesperetin and naringenin with citrus fruit intake). The large variations in urinary polyphenols observed are largely determined by food preferences. These polyphenol biomarkers should allow more accurate evaluation of the relationships between polyphenol exposure and the risk of chronic diseases in large epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27273479      PMCID: PMC4895229          DOI: 10.1038/srep26905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Polyphenols are non-nutritive plant secondary metabolites commonly found in the human diet. Over the past two decades, both experimental and epidemiological data have suggested a role of polyphenols in the prevention of chronic diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes and certain cancers1234. Dietary polyphenols constitute a large family of approximately 500 different compounds with very diverse structures and distribution in foods5. Daily intake of total polyphenols has been shown to vary between ~0.5 and 2 g/d across European countries6. Their absorption in the gut varies widely and is largely determined by their chemical structures7. Once absorbed, most polyphenols undergo phase II conjugation and are rapidly eliminated in urine and bile as glucuronides and sulfate esters. Non-absorbed polyphenols as well as those excreted back to the gut lumen with the bile are extensively metabolized by the microbiota, producing a range of simple phenolic compounds. Polyphenol metabolism is known to be influenced by factors such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), renal function, gut microbiota activity, recent use of antibiotics, and genetic traits89. Due to these many factors that may determine polyphenol bioavailability, biomarkers may be better indicators of polyphenol exposures and better predictors of disease risk than intake measurements assessed using dietary questionnaires3. To date, concentrations of polyphenols have been measured in urine or blood in a limited number of epidemiologic studies310. However, the range of polyphenols simultaneously measured was limited to a few compounds, most often isoflavones or lignans. Recently, we developed a new method that allows the quantification in urine of 37 polyphenols and polyphenol metabolites representative of the major polyphenol classes and subclasses11. These polyphenols are measured in urine from 475 participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. This study offers a unique opportunity to compare the urinary excretion of polyphenols in subjects from different European countries with a large variability in polyphenol intakes6. The influence of several lifestyle and dietary factors on urinary polyphenol concentrations is also examined.

Material and Methods

Study population

The EPIC study is a large cohort study with over half a million participants of both genders mostly recruited from the general population between 1992 and 2000 in 23 centres from 10 European countries12. Data used in the present study were derived from the EPIC calibration study (n = 36,994), in which a single 24-hour dietary recall (24-HDR) was collected from a random sample of the entire cohort13. In a convenience sub-sample (n = 1,386), 24-hour urine specimens were collected between 1995 and 199914. Individuals who collected the 24-hour urine specimen and the 24-HDR on the same day were included for the present study (n = 475). The study was performed in accordance with the approved guidelines. Approval for the study was obtained from ethical review boards of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and from all participating institutions. All participants provided written informed consent.

24-Hour urine specimen

24-Hour urine samples were collected over 2 g boric acid used as preservative and stored at −20 °C. Completeness of collection was monitored using p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) given to participants in tablet form14.

Urinary polyphenol measurements

Urine samples were first hydrolysed with a β-glucuronidase/sulfatase enzyme mixture and the resulting polyphenol aglycones were extracted twice with ethyl acetate. Quantitative dansylation of phenolic hydroxyl groups was carried out with either 13C-labelled dansyl chloride (samples) or non-labelled dansyl chloride (well-characterized reference pooled sample) as previously described11. Each 13C-dansylated sample was mixed with the 12C-dansylated reference sample, and the relative concentrations in samples over the reference sample were determined by UPLC-ESI-MS-MS in batches of 25 samples. Limits of quantification (LOQ) for the 37 polyphenols varied between 0.01 μM for equol and 1.1 μM for 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid. Intra-batch coefficients of variation varied between 3.9% and 9.6% depending on polyphenols. Inter-batch variations were lower than 15% for 31 compounds and lower than 29% for 6 additional polyphenols out of the 38 tested.

Dietary and lifestyle information

Dietary data were collected using a single 24-HDR using a harmonized methodology (EPIC-Soft)15. The 24-HDR was administered in a face-to-face interview. Total energy and alcohol intakes were estimated by using the standardized country-specific EPIC Nutrient Database15. Data on lifestyle factors, including educational level, physical activity and smoking history, were collected at baseline through questionnaires1316. Data on age, body weight and height were self-reported by study participants during the 24-HDR interview.

Statistical analyses

Urinary polyphenol concentrations that fell below the LOQ were set to values corresponding to half the limit of quantification1718. Three polyphenols (procyanidins B1 and B2, and (+)-gallocatechin) were excluded from the analysis, since 98–100% of the values were polyphenol 24-hour urinary excretion are presented as medians and 10th and 90th percentiles, since they had skewed distributions. Pearson correlation coefficients between excretion levels of the 34 remaining compounds were computed after log-transformation and visualized using a heatmap plot. Spearman correlation coefficients between the 34 urinary polyphenols and 110 plant-derived food groups were also calculated. The sources of variability within the urinary polyphenol excretion pertaining to lifestyle characteristics and technical processing parameters were assessed using principal component partial R-square (PC-PR2) analysis19. PC-PR2 identifies and quantifies sources of variability by combining features of principal component analysis with those of multivariable linear regression analysis. In this study, the list of variables scrutinized included: age, sex, study centre, BMI (kg/m2), alcohol intake (g/d), educational level, smoking status, physical activity, and batch. Categorical variables were modelled using indicator variables in regression analyses. A variance threshold equal to 80% was used in the PC-PR2. Analytical missing values of urinary polyphenols were imputed using the expectation-maximization algorithm prior to PC-PR2 analysis20. Urinary polyphenols with a percentage of missing values greater than 20% (gallic acid and 3-hydroxyphenylacetic acid) were excluded from the PC-PR2 analysis. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences of 34 urinary polyphenol levels according to demographic and lifestyle factors. The threshold for statistical significance was set after Bonferroni correction for the number of measured polyphenols, to a P value < 0.001 (0.05/34) (two-tailed). All analyses were conducted using the R software, version R.3.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

The 475 participants included in the study were 33–77 years old and mostly recruited from the general population residing in defined geographical areas in France (Paris and surroundings), Germany (Heidelberg and Potsdam), Greece (nation-wide) and Italy (Florence, Naples, Ragusa, Turin, and Varese). The percentage of women ranged from 35% (Ragusa) to 71% (Florence), except in France and Naples where only women were recruited (Table 1). Anthropometric and lifestyle characteristics are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Centre-specific characteristics of the study population.

Centre (Country)nWomenAgeNever smokingPhysically inactiveUniversity studiesBMIEnergy intakeAlcohol intake
%years*%%%kg/m2*kcal/d*g/d#
Ile-de-France (France)6710053 (7)67194323 (4)2,082 (683)9 (0–18)
Florence (Italy)457156 (6)42271626 (4)2,022 (546)12 (0–21)
Varese (Italy)513757 (7)458625 (3)2,525 (880)12 (0–32)
Ragusa (Italy)173550 (7)29241226 (4)2,529 (999)5 (0–25)
Turin (Italy)424853 (7)52362925 (3)2,439 (697)22 (0–38)
Naples (Italy)2010048 (6)40551527 (5)1,955 (545)5 (0–12)
Greece565258 (11)5445430 (4)1,728 (659)0 (0–8)
Heidelberg (Germany)596151 (9)5492925 (5)2,431 (995)11 (1–38)
Potsdam (Germany)1184154 (9)48314127 (4)2,212 (707)1 (0–20)
TOTAL4755854 (9)51262626 (4)2,200 (785)8 (0–23)

*mean (standard deviation).

#median (25th–75th).

Thirty four polyphenols were detected and quantified in 24-hour urine collected in the 475 subjects. Medians of urinary excretion are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid was the most abundant polyphenol in urine (157 μmol/24 h), followed by 3-hydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic, vanillic and homovanillic acids, with excretion levels varying between 20 and 50 μmol/24 h. Equol, apigenin and resveratrol were found in the lowest quantities (<0.1 μmol/24 h). A high percentage of participants with urinary concentrations below the limit of quantification was observed for isorhamnetin (55%), phloretin (52%), gallic acid ethyl ester (52%), (+)-catechin (37%), (−)-epicatechin (27%), hesperetin (26%) and apigenin (25%).
Table 2

Urinary polyphenol excretion (μmol/24 h) in 475 subjects from the EPIC cohort.

Urinary polyphenolsPolyphenol class/subclassOrigin1N2<LOQ (n)MedianP10thP90th
4-Hydroxybenzoic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsMicrobiota473019.379.9035.65
3-Hydroxybenzoic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsMicrobiota47502.030.666.37
Protocatechuic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsMicrobiota47503.431.806.30
Gallic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsFood33650.710.262.25
Vanillic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsMicrobiota/food464036.4514.5993.76
3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsMicrobiota46804.041.6112.31
Gallic acid ethyl esterPhenolic acids/Hydroxybenzoic acidsFood4502340.190.082.65
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylacetic acidsMicrobiota4740156.8291.19324.80
3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylacetic acidsMicrobiota2991146.7219.9395.50
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylacetic acidsMicrobiota47505.062.8210.69
Homovanillic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylacetic acidsMicrobiota/endogenous475024.0815.6338.70
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylpropanoic acidsMicrobiota45309.453.2429.02
3,5-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxyphenylpropanoic acidsMicrobiota473011.194.6028.44
p-Coumaric acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxycinnamic acidsFood/microbiota46402.130.924.82
m-Coumaric acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxycinnamic acidsMicrobiota46782.220.559.57
Caffeic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxycinnamic acidsFood47504.751.9810.60
Ferulic acidPhenolic acids/Hydroxycinnamic acidsEndogenous/food470042.2118.3783.02
KaempferolFlavonoids/FlavonolsFood408350.120.050.30
QuercetinFlavonoids/FlavonolsFood44400.510.231.10
IsorhamnetinFlavonoids/FlavonolsEndogenous4622550.520.271.17
ApigeninFlavonoids/FlavonesFood4481130.080.010.34
NaringeninFlavonoids/FlavanonesFood470111.630.439.32
HesperetinFlavonoids/FlavanonesFood4691221.000.168.29
DaidzeinFlavonoids/IsoflavonoidsFood407131.180.148.33
GenisteinFlavonoids/IsoflavonoidsFood413120.220.051.19
EquolFlavonoids/IsoflavonoidsMicrobiota397540.050.010.14
PhloretinFlavonoids/DihydrochalconesFood4752480.370.171.14
(+)-CatechinFlavonoids/FlavanolsFood4521650.100.030.37
(-)-EpicatechinFlavonoids/FlavanolsFood4561230.210.080.55
ResveratrolStilbenesFood429520.090.020.54
TyrosolTyrosolsFood45700.800.105.25
HydroxytyrosolTyrosolsFood47402.440.7512.85
EnterodiolLignansMicrobiota433220.370.091.73
EnterolactoneLignansMicrobiota46933.120.5412.22

LOQ, limit of quantification; P, percentile

1The main origin of the phenolic compound in urine is indicated. Food: the compound present in food is directly absorbed in the gut or it is absorbed after hydrolysis of the corresponding glycosides or esters. Microbiota: the compound results from the transformation by the microbiota of food polyphenols and/or eventually other food or endogenous compounds. Endogenous: the compounds results from the O-methylation of phenolic compounds of food or endogenous origin.

2Number of samples in which each phenolic compound was firmly identified.

Figure 1

Urinary polyphenol concentrations by study centre in the EPIC cohort.

Dots in the boxplot are the medians of urinary polyphenol concentrations in each centre.

When correlations between urinary polyphenols were examined, forty-one moderate to high correlations (r > 0.5) were found (Fig. 2). The highest correlations were observed for the following compounds: 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (r = 0.86), genistein and daidzein (r = 0.83), protocatechuic acid and caffeic acid (r = 0.81), ferulic acid and caffeic acid (r = 0.80), resveratrol and gallic acid ethyl ester (r = 0.80), naringenin and hesperetin (r = 0.77), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid (r = 0.77), and caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (r = 0.76).
Figure 2

Heatmap of Pearson correlations between the log-transformed urinary polyphenol excretions in the EPIC study.

Large differences in the urinary excretion of each polyphenol were observed between subjects. PC-PR2 analysis showed that 23.5% of the total variance in urinary polyphenol excretion was explained by lifestyle and analytical factors. Study centre displayed the largest Rpartial2 value (9.6%), followed by batch (5.1%) and alcohol intake (4.1%). The remaining factors (age, sex, BMI, educational level, smoking status, and physical activity) accounted for a minor fraction of the variability (<1.2% for each factor). Differences in polyphenol urinary excretion between study centres are illustrated in Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1. For example, median urinary excretion of hesperetin was 17-fold higher in Ragusa-Italy (7.8 μmol/24 h) than in France (0.46 μmol/24 h). Median excretion levels of daidzein were 15-fold higher in Heidelberg-Germany (2.38 μmol/24 h) than in Ragusa-Italy (0.16 μmol/24 h), 11-fold higher for naringenin in Ragusa-Italy (9.9 μmol/24 h) than in France (0.91 μmol/24 h), and 7-fold higher for tyrosol in Ragusa-Italy (2.56 μmol/24 h) than in Potsdam-Germany (0.35 μmol/24 h). Variations of urinary polyphenol excretions according to other lifestyle factors were also examined. For sex, 10 urinary polyphenols were significantly more abundant in men than in women. Indeed, median urinary levels of tyrosol, hesperetin, naringenin, vanillic and 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acids were at least 1.4-fold higher in men than in women (Supplementary Table 2). For schooling level, urinary daidzein (3.1-fold change), enterolactone (1.8-fold change), gallic acid (1.6-fold change), and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (1.2-fold change) levels were significantly lower in less educated people (none or primary school completed) compared to subjects with higher education (Supplementary Table 3). For total energy intake, higher levels of 7 polyphenols in urine (4-hydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic, vanillic, homovanillic, protocatechuic and p-coumaric acids, and equol) were observed in those who fell into the top tertile of energy intake (Supplementary Table 4). For BMI, only the excretion of gallic acid was significantly different across BMI subgroups (data not shown). Its level decreased with increasing BMI: 0.87 μmol/24 h for subjects with BMI <25 kg/m2, 0.64 μmol/24 h for subjects with BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2, and 0.50 μmol/24 h for subjects with BMI ≥30 kg/m2. For total alcohol consumption, subjects drinking >20 g of alcohol/d showed urinary concentrations 9-fold, 7-fold, 5-fold, 4-fold, 3-fold, and 2.3-fold higher for tyrosol, gallic acid ethyl ester, resveratrol, hydroxytyrosol, (+)-catechin, and gallic acid, respectively, when compared to subjects drinking <0.1g alcohol/d (Supplementary Table 5). No significant differences were observed for the remaining factors studied: age, smoking status, and physical activity (data not shown). Correlations between urinary excretion of specific polyphenols and intakes of 110 food groups were systema-tically studied. Plant-derived foods were considered in this analysis due to the plant origin of polyphenols. The urinary excretions of a large number of the measured polyphenols were found to be correlated to the intake of 14 of the 110 plant-derived food groups documented in the 24-HDR (Table 3)1920. For each of these food groups, polyphenols were ranked according to their Spearman correlation coefficient. The first two to nine most highly correlated polyphenols are shown in Table 3. Correlations with 4 of these food groups need to be interpreted with caution due to the high percentage of non-consumers (>90%): olives (90.7%), berries (91.2%), grapes (96.4%), and soy products (98.1%). Correlations of polyphenols with intake of these 4 polyphenol-rich food groups were low (data not shown). In addition, correlation between urinary excretion of equol and intake of dairy products was also examined because of the known occurrence of equol in these food products21. Statistically significant correlations between levels of urinary equol and the intake of dairy products (r = 0.33), especially with milk (r = 0.27) and cheese (r = 0.18), were found. Correlations between intake of polyphenol-rich foods or food groups were also examined. Correlations were low (data not shown) except for olive oil and coffee intake (r = −0.48).
Table 3

Urinary polyphenols most highly correlated to recent food intake in the EPIC cohort.

FoodConsumers (n)Polyphenol (Spearman correlation coefficient)
Red wine121Gallic acid ethyl ester (0.69), resveratrol (0.59), gallic acid (0.48), hydroxytyrosol (0.43), tyrosol (0.36), (+)-catechin (0.34), p-coumaric acid (0.27), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.19), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.15)
Coffee410Caffeic acid (0.65), protocatechuic acid (0.60), ferulic acid (0.58), m-coumaric acid (0.53), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (0.51), 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (0.39), vanillic acid (0.31)
Tea117Gallic acid (0.38), (−)-epicatechin (0.30), (+)-catechin (0.22), quercetin (0.19)
Chocolate111(−)-Epicatechin (0.22), vanillic acid (0.15)
Citrus fruits185Hesperetin (0.60), naringenin (0.56), kaempferol (0.33)
Citrus juices131Hesperetin (0.15), naringenin (0.15), kaempferol (0.10)
Apple and pear226Phloretin (0.40), (−)-epicatechin (0.20), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.19), homovanillic acid (0.16)
Berries42p-Coumaric acid (0.20), (+)-catechin (0.19)
Onion, garlic220Quercetin (0.17), apigenin (0.11), isorhamnetin (0.10)
Olive oil238Hydroxytyrosol (0.36), tyrosol (0.31), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.17), apigenin (0.17)
Olives44Hydroxytyrosol (0.34), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.29), homovanillic acid (0.22), tyrosol (0.11)
Bread, non-white2603,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid (0.45), 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (0.43), enterolactone (0.25), daidzein (0.20), enterodiol (0.20), genistein (0.19), m-coumaric acid (0.16), ferulic acid (0.13)
Breakfast cereals323,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid (0.17), 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (0.16), daidzein (0.15), equol (0.08), enterolactone (0.08)
Soya products9Genistein (0.17), daidzein (0.10)

The top two to nine polyphenols (out of 34 measured polyphenols) most highly correlated with the intake of each food group are listed. The number of reported correlations for each food group was based on current knowledge on polyphenol food composition and polyphenol metabolism. Some additional polyphenols may also be correlated to intake of each food, but they were excluded if not known as a component of the food considered or as a possible metabolite derived from a component of this food.

Discussion

In the current study, a new analytical method was used to estimate, in an adult European population, the concentrations of 34 urinary polyphenols of all main polyphenol classes: flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans and stilbenes. These polyphenols detected in urine after enzymatic deconjugation are either parent compounds as found in food, phenolic microbial metabolites or O-methylated tissular metabolites (Table 2). Far fewer polyphenols were measured in previous population studies2223, most of them being focused on the analysis of a specific polyphenol class, such as stilbenes24, phytoestrogens (isoflavones and lignans)25, or alkylresorcinols26. As expected, levels of urinary excretion varied highly between polyphenols. The most abundant urinary polyphenols detected in our study were phenolic acids formed by the microbiota: 4- and 3-hydroxyphenylacetic acids, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, protocatechuic acid (and their O-methylated metabolites: homovanillic acid and vanillic acid, respectively), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 3,5- and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acids, and, 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid27, with median excretion levels ranging from 3.4 to 157 μmol/24 h. These phenolic acids are produced by microbial transformation of a wide range of dietary polyphenols2829, as well as endogenous metabolites such as dopamine30 and aromatic amino acids31. Two hydroxycinnamic acids were also excreted in urine at high levels: caffeic acid (4.7 μmol/24 h) mainly derived from the hydrolysis of caffeoyl esters such as chlorogenic acids abundant in coffee, and ferulic acid (42 μmol/24 h) that may originate both from O-methylation of caffeic acid in the tissues and the hydrolysis in the gut of ferulic acid esterified to cereal cell walls32. Urinary levels of flavonoids, lignans, tyrosols and stilbenes were low (median excretions <3.1 μmol/24 h). These low levels are explained by either low intakes (e.g. isoflavonoids, stilbenes, lignans, tyrosols)633, or poor absorption (often 0.1–10% depending on the specific polyphenol)7. Levels of polyphenol urinary excretion were comparable to those of 11 polyphenols previously measured in a population of 53 French adults22. Excretion levels of the different polyphenols showed correlations that can be explained by either co-occurrence in a given food group or by metabolic parentage. Typical examples of food co-occurrence are genistein and daidzein in soy products (r = 0.82), resveratrol and gallic acid ethyl ester in wine (r = 0.76), naringenin and hesperetin in citrus fruits (r = 0.78), tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in olive oil (r = 0.70), (−)-epicatechin and (+)-catechin in tea, apple, wine and chocolate (r = 0.66), phloretin and quercetin (r = 0.53) and phloretin and (−)-epicatechin (r = 0.49) in apple3435. Correlations between metabolites participating in a common metabolic pathway involve both metabolites linked through microbial catabolic reactions and O-methylation reactions carried out in tissues such as the liver. High correlations were observed between microbial metabolites and their precursors: 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid and 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (r = 0.86), two main metabolites of alkylresorcinols36, enterodiol and enterolactone (r = 0.50), m-coumaric acid and 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (r = 071), caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (r = 0.74), caffeic acid and protocatechuic acid (r = 0.79), and protocatechuic acid and 3-hydroxybenzoic acid (r = 0.58). O-methylation reactions explain correlations between 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid (r = 0.76), quercetin and isorhamnetin (r = 0.64), protocatechuic acid and vanillic acid (r = 0.52), and caffeic acid and ferulic acid (r = 0.79). The particularly high correlation observed between caffeic and ferulic acids suggests that ferulic acid originates mainly from the O-methylation of caffeic acid, although the weak correlation observed with intake of non-white bread (Table 3) also supports its formation through hydrolysis of ferulic acid bound to cereal cell walls37. Urinary polyphenol excretion differed widely according to study centre, with 10-fold higher changes for hesperetin, naringenin and daidzein, and 5-fold higher changes for tyrosol, resveratrol and equol. Similar magnitudes of changes in plasma concentrations between centres were observed for isoflavones (13-fold for daidzein and 8-fold for genistein) and lignans (4-fold for enterolignans) in a previous EPIC study25. These large variations of urinary excretions across study centres could be due to differences in dietary patterns across European countries. Polyphenols and polyphenol-rich foods are consumed diversely across centres of the EPIC study6, and polyphenol urinary excretion is expected to differ similarly. In addition to study centre, polyphenol urinary excretion was found to be associated with several other sociodemographic, lifestyle and anthropometric factors, Total alcohol consumption was a relevant source of variability. Among sources of alcohol, red wine is particularly rich in polyphenols and its consumption varies widely between study centres38. In the current study, red wine was significantly correlated with levels of several polyphenols in urine, including gallic acid ethyl ester and resveratrol. Men also excreted more polyphenols than women, although differences were relatively small (<2.4) compared to differences by study centre or alcohol consumption. A potential explanation is that men consume more calories than women (mean 2,502 vs. 2,108 kcal/d), and higher total energy intake was shown to be positively associated with higher polyphenol intake6. This is consistent with the higher urinary excretion of polyphenols we observed in subjects in the highest tertile of total energy intake. Concentrations of 4-hydroxyphenylacetic, ferulic, vanillic, homovanillic and p-coumaric acids were higher in men and in subjects consuming more calories. Higher polyphenol excretion in men can also be explained by a higher consumption of coffee in men as compared to women (343 vs. 244 mL/d). In agreement with this interpretation, two of the compounds showing higher concentrations in men (ferulic and vanillic acids; see Table 3) were also highly correlated with coffee consumption. Education level was associated with the excretion of certain phenolic compounds. Subjects with no or only a primary level of education had lower levels of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, enterolactone, daidzein and gallic acid than those with a higher education level. Polyphenol intake was also previously found to be higher in people with a university degree than in those without one6. Concentrations of gallic acid in urine were inversely associated with BMI. They were also moderately correlated with tea and wine consumption (r = 0.44 and 0.45, respectively), which are usually related to a healthier lifestyle and higher education level39. Dietary flavonoids, characteristic of wine and tea34, are also higher in subjects with lower BMI (<25 kg/m2) in the EPIC cohort640. No differences were observed by age, smoking status, and physical activity. Correlations between urinary polyphenol excretions and food intake (Table 3) show the consistency of our analytical results and point towards the potential use of these phenolic compounds as dietary biomarkers1041. As expected, we observed high correlations between red wine intake and the main polyphenols coming from red wine, such as gallic acid ethyl ester (r = 0.69) and resveratrol (r = 0.59)4142. These correlations are similar to those observed with total alcohol consumption. High correlations were also observed between coffee consumption and caffeic acid (r = 0.65), and citrus fruit intake and hesperetin and naringenin (r = 0.60 and 0.56 respectively)43. Weaker correlations (0.31 < r < 0.45) were observed between tea intake and gallic acid, apple intake and phloretin, olive oil consumption and hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol, non-white bread intake and 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid. All these phenolic compounds are known to be characteristic of the foods with which they are correlated or particularly abundant in these foods34 and several of them have been proposed as biomarkers of intake for these foods41444546. Correlation of urinary equol with consumption of dairy products (r = 0.33) provides new information of their dietary sources in this population. Equol, a metabolite of daidzein formed by the gut microbiota, was detected in 86% of the subjects (Table 2). Its correlation with dairy products and not soy food intake provides new evidence of its dairy origin through its formation from daidzein in the rumen of cows fed soybeans and secretion in milk21. The magnitude of the correlations observed between polyphenols in urine and food intake depends on various factors, including the reliability of the dietary intake measurements, the variability of polyphenol contents in a given food, the existence of confounders such as other foods containing the same polyphenol or polyphenol precursors (see in Table 3, gallic acid correlated with both red wine and tea, ferulic acid correlated with both coffee and non-white bread, hydroxytyrosol correlated with both red wine and olive oil), and inter-individual variability in the transformation of the food parent compound to the phenolic biomarker. For these reasons, levels of correlation observed here have limited value per se to evaluate the usefulness of a potential biomarker. However, they are useful indicators when comparing the potential value of different biomarkers for a particular food. Polyphenols showing the highest correlations (Table 3) should also be the best predictors of food intake in this population. This study is the first showing variations of a broad profile of urinary polyphenols in healthy European people. The present study has a number of strengths, in particular the novel analytical method based on the use of tandem mass spectrometry, which made possible the estimation of a large number of polyphenols. Another advantage was the collection of 24 h urine samples rather than spot urine samples, which is not so common in large epidemiological studies. Furthermore, methods of urine collection, sample handling and storage, and dietary assessment were highly standardized in all study centres14. The main limitation of the current study is that our results are not fully generalizable, since not all EPIC cohorts are population-based12. Another limitation is that exposure to some important polyphenols could not be measured in urine with our method (anthocyanidins and gallocatechins) or could not be measured with sufficient sensitivity (e.g. proanthocyanidin dimers not detected)11. Finally, no data are available regarding the effect of long term storage on the concentrations of urinary polyphenols, although a prior study has shown that urinary resveratrol concentrations remained unchanged when samples had been stored at −80 °C for 5 years4748. However, possible degradation of test compounds in urine over time should affect similar to all participants since all samples have a long but relatively similar storage time. In conclusion, this study shows large variations in excretions of urinary polyphenols across adult European populations, reflecting considerable variability in the consumption of polyphenol-rich foods. Some of these urinary polyphenols may also be used as dietary biomarkers for some polyphenol-rich foods, and further research in other large epidemiological studies and intervention studies is warranted for further validation. Measurement of these polyphenols in urine should allow more accurate evaluation of polyphenol exposure to reveal new associations with risk of chronic diseases in large epidemiological studies.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zamora-Ros, R. et al. Urinary excretions of 34 dietary polyphenols and their associations with lifestyle factors in the EPIC cohort study. Sci. Rep. 6, 26905; doi: 10.1038/srep26905 (2016).
  42 in total

Review 1.  Interaction between phenolics and gut microbiota: role in human health.

Authors:  María V Selma; Juan C Espín; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Urinary sevoflurane and hexafluoro-isopropanol as biomarkers of low-level occupational exposure to sevoflurane.

Authors:  Antonio Accorsi; Barbara Morrone; Irene Domenichini; Simona Valenti; Giovanni Battista Raffi; Francesco Saverio Violante
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies.

Authors:  Claudine Manach; Gary Williamson; Christine Morand; Augustin Scalbert; Christian Rémésy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Phenol-Explorer: an online comprehensive database on polyphenol contents in foods.

Authors:  V Neveu; J Perez-Jiménez; F Vos; V Crespy; L du Chaffaut; L Mennen; C Knox; R Eisner; J Cruz; D Wishart; A Scalbert
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study.

Authors:  Nadia Slimani; Sheila Bingham; Shirley Runswick; Pietro Ferrari; Nicholas E Day; Ailsa A Welch; Timothy J Key; Antony B Miller; Heiner Boeing; Sabina Sieri; Fabrizio Veglia; Dominico Palli; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Bas Bueno-De-Mesquita; Marga C Ocké; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Antonia Trichopoulou; Wija A Van Staveren; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Polyphenol metabolome in human urine and its association with intake of polyphenol-rich foods across European countries.

Authors:  William Mb Edmands; Pietro Ferrari; Joseph A Rothwell; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Dinesh K Barupal; Carine Biessy; Mazda Jenab; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Guy Fagherazzi; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Verena A Katzke; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Domenico Palli; Sara Grioni; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; Amalia Mattiello; Isabelle Romieu; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics.

Authors:  N Slimani; R Kaaks; P Ferrari; C Casagrande; F Clavel-Chapelon; G Lotze; A Kroke; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; C Lauria; M Bellegotti; M C Ocké; P H M Peeters; D Engeset; E Lund; A Agudo; N Larrañaga; I Mattisson; C Andren; I Johansson; G Davey; A A Welch; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; W A Van Staveren; R Saracci; E Riboli
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Urinary excretion of 13 dietary flavonoids and phenolic acids in free-living healthy subjects - variability and possible use as biomarkers of polyphenol intake.

Authors:  L I Mennen; D Sapinho; H Ito; P Galan; S Hercberg; A Scalbert
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  KEGG Atlas mapping for global analysis of metabolic pathways.

Authors:  Shujiro Okuda; Takuji Yamada; Masami Hamajima; Masumi Itoh; Toshiaki Katayama; Peer Bork; Susumu Goto; Minoru Kanehisa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Dietary intakes and food sources of phenolic acids in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.

Authors:  Raul Zamora-Ros; Joseph A Rothwell; Augustin Scalbert; Viktoria Knaze; Isabelle Romieu; Nadia Slimani; Guy Fagherazzi; Florence Perquier; Marina Touillaud; Esther Molina-Montes; José María Huerta; Aurelio Barricarte; Pilar Amiano; Virginia Menéndez; Rosario Tumino; Maria Santucci de Magistris; Domenico Palli; Fulvio Ricceri; Sabina Sieri; Francesca L Crowe; Kay-Thee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Verena Grote; Kuanrong Li; Heiner Boeing; Jana Förster; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Konstantinos Tsiotas; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Martine Ros; Petra H M Peeters; Anne Tjønneland; Jytte Halkjær; Kim Overvad; Ulrika Ericson; Peter Wallström; Ingegerd Johansson; Rikard Landberg; Elisabete Weiderpass; Dagrun Engeset; Guri Skeie; Petra Wark; Elio Riboli; Carlos A González
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  17 in total

1.  Dietary flavonoid intake and colorectal cancer risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

Authors:  Raul Zamora-Ros; Dinesh K Barupal; Joseph A Rothwell; Mazda Jenab; Veronika Fedirko; Isabelle Romieu; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Kim Overvad; Cecilie Kyrø; Anne Tjønneland; Aurélie Affret; Mathilde His; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Verena Katzke; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Androniki Naska; Maria Kritikou; Calogero Saieva; Claudia Agnoli; Maria Santucci de Magistris; Rosario Tumino; Francesca Fasanelli; Elisabete Weiderpass; Guri Skeie; Susana Merino; Paula Jakszyn; Maria-José Sánchez; Miren Dorronsoro; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Emily Sonestedt; Ulrika Ericson; Lena Maria Nilsson; Stina Bodén; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Thee Khaw; Heinz Freisling; Amanda J Cross; Elio Riboli; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Lignan exposure: a worldwide perspective.

Authors:  Lucia Rizzolo-Brime; Elida M Caro-Garcia; Cynthia A Alegre-Miranda; Mireia Felez-Nobrega; Raul Zamora-Ros
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Identification and Quantification of Urinary Microbial Phenolic Metabolites by HPLC-ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap-HRMS and Their Relationship with Dietary Polyphenols in Adolescents.

Authors:  Emily P Laveriano-Santos; María Marhuenda-Muñoz; Anna Vallverdú-Queralt; Miriam Martínez-Huélamo; Anna Tresserra-Rimbau; Elefterios Miliarakis; Camila Arancibia-Riveros; Olga Jáuregui; Ana María Ruiz-León; Sara Castro-Baquero; Ramón Estruch; Patricia Bodega; Mercedes de Miguel; Amaya de Cos-Gandoy; Jesús Martínez-Gómez; Gloria Santos-Beneit; Juan M Fernández-Alvira; Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Rosa M Lamuela-Raventós
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Oleocanthal-rich extra virgin olive oil demonstrates acute anti-platelet effects in healthy men in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Karan Agrawal; Eleni Melliou; Xueqi Li; Theresa L Pedersen; Selina C Wang; Prokopios Magiatis; John W Newman; Roberta R Holt
Journal:  J Funct Foods       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.451

5.  Dietary intake of total polyphenol and polyphenol classes and the risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

Authors:  Raul Zamora-Ros; Valerie Cayssials; Mazda Jenab; Joseph A Rothwell; Veronika Fedirko; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Anne Tjønneland; Cecilie Kyrø; Kim Overvad; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Franck Carbonnel; Yahya Mahamat-Saleh; Rudolf Kaaks; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Elissavet Valanou; Effie Vasilopoulou; Giovanna Masala; Valeria Pala; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Fulvio Ricceri; Elisabete Weiderpass; Marko Lukic; Torkjel M Sandanger; Cristina Lasheras; Antonio Agudo; Maria-Jose Sánchez; Pilar Amiano; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Emily Sonestedt; Bodil Ohlsson; Lena Maria Nilsson; Martin Rutegård; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Kay-Thee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Kathryn Bradbury; Heinz Freisling; Isabelle Romieu; Amanda J Cross; Paolo Vineis; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  An electrochemical method for detecting the biomarker 4-HPA by allosteric activation of Acetobacter baumannii reductase C1 subunit.

Authors:  Somjai Teanphonkrang; Wipa Suginta; Jeerus Sucharitakul; Tamo Fukamizo; Pimchai Chaiyen; Albert Schulte
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Perspective: Dietary Biomarkers of Intake and Exposure-Exploration with Omics Approaches.

Authors:  Padma Maruvada; Johanna W Lampe; David S Wishart; Dinesh Barupal; Deirdra N Chester; Dylan Dodd; Yannick Djoumbou-Feunang; Pieter C Dorrestein; Lars O Dragsted; John Draper; Linda C Duffy; Johanna T Dwyer; Nancy J Emenaker; Oliver Fiehn; Robert E Gerszten; Frank B Hu; Robert W Karp; David M Klurfeld; Maren R Laughlin; A Roger Little; Christopher J Lynch; Steven C Moore; Holly L Nicastro; Diane M O'Brien; José M Ordovás; Stavroula K Osganian; Mary Playdon; Ross Prentice; Daniel Raftery; Nichole Reisdorph; Helen M Roche; Sharon A Ross; Shengmin Sang; Augustin Scalbert; Pothur R Srinivas; Steven H Zeisel
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 11.567

8.  Urine Metabolites Associated with the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet: Results from the DASH-Sodium Trial.

Authors:  Hyunju Kim; Alice H Lichtenstein; Kari E Wong; Lawrence J Appel; Josef Coresh; Casey M Rebholz
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Identification of Urinary Polyphenol Metabolite Patterns Associated with Polyphenol-Rich Food Intake in Adults from Four European Countries.

Authors:  Hwayoung Noh; Heinz Freisling; Nada Assi; Raul Zamora-Ros; David Achaintre; Aurélie Affret; Francesca Mancini; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Anna Flögel; Heiner Boeing; Tilman Kühn; Ruth Schübel; Antonia Trichopoulou; Androniki Naska; Maria Kritikou; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Rosario Tumino; Fulvio Ricceri; Maria Santucci de Magistris; Amanda Cross; Nadia Slimani; Augustin Scalbert; Pietro Ferrari
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Validation of biomarkers of food intake-critical assessment of candidate biomarkers.

Authors:  L O Dragsted; Q Gao; A Scalbert; G Vergères; M Kolehmainen; C Manach; L Brennan; L A Afman; D S Wishart; C Andres Lacueva; M Garcia-Aloy; H Verhagen; E J M Feskens; G Praticò
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.