Literature DB >> 27273341

'We just do the dirty work': dealing with incontinence, courtesy stigma and the low occupational status of carework in long-term aged care facilities.

Joan Ostaszkiewicz1, Beverly O'Connell2, Trisha Dunning3.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To systematically examine, describe and explain how continence care was determined, delivered and communicated in Australian long aged care facilities.
BACKGROUND: Incontinence is a highly stigmatising condition that affects a disproportionally large number of people living in long-term aged care facilities. Its day-to-day management is mainly undertaken by careworkers. We conducted a Grounded theory study to explore how continence care was determined, delivered and communicated in long-term aged care facilities. This paper presents one finding, i.e. how careworkers in long-term aged care facilities deal with the stigma, devaluation and the aesthetically unpleasant aspects of their work.
DESIGN: Grounded theory.
METHODS: Eighty-eight hours of field observations in two long-term aged care facilities in Australia. In addition, in-depth interviews with 18 nurses and careworkers who had experience of providing, supervising or assessment of continence care in any long-term aged care facility in Australia.
RESULTS: Occupational exposure to incontinence contributes to the low occupational status of carework in long-term aged care facilities, and continence care is a symbolic marker for inequalities within the facility, the nursing profession and society at large. Careworkers' affective and behavioural responses are characterised by: (1) accommodating the context; (2) dissociating oneself; (3) distancing oneself and (4) attempting to elevate one's role status.
CONCLUSION: The theory extends current understandings about the links between incontinence, continence care, courtesy stigma, emotional labour and the low occupational status of carework in long-term aged care facilities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides insights into the ways in which tacit beliefs and values about incontinence, cleanliness and contamination may affect the social organisation and delivery of care in long-term aged care facilities. Nurse leaders should challenge the stigma and devaluation of carework and careworkers, and reframe carework as 'dignity work'.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carework; dignity; incontinence; long-term aged care; role status; stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27273341     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  7 in total

Review 1.  Exploring literature on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards urinary incontinence management: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anika Janse van Vuuren; J A van Rensburg; Lonese Jacobs; Susan Hanekom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  What Is Old Is New Again: Global Issues Influencing Workers and Their Work in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Whitney B Berta; Cal Stewart; Andrea Baumann
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-06

3.  Governance of Assisted Living in Singapore: Lessons for Aging Countries.

Authors:  Si Ying Tan; Luting Poh; Jeremy Lim
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings.

Authors:  Joan Ostaszkiewicz; Virginia Dickson-Swift; Alison Hutchinson; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Development of the Nurse Occupational Stigma Scale.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Shuangxin Zhang; Jiaqi Leng; Zhiguang Fan; Yi Luo
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-07-02

6.  The Social Construction of Stigma in Aged-Care Work: Implications for Health Professionals' Work Intentions.

Authors:  Asmita V Manchha; Kïrsten A Way; Ken Tann; Michael Thai
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  Systematic Review of Socio-Emotional Values Within Organizations.

Authors:  Tancredi Pascucci; Giuseppina Maria Cardella; Brizeida Hernández-Sánchez; Jose C Sánchez-García
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.