Literature DB >> 27272982

Impact testing of the residual limb: System response to changes in prosthetic stiffness.

Erin Boutwell1, Rebecca Stine, Steven Gard.   

Abstract

Currently, it is unknown whether changing prosthetic limb stiffness affects the total limb stiffness and influences the shock absorption of an individual with transtibial amputation. The hypotheses tested within this study are that a decrease in longitudinal prosthetic stiffness will produce (1) a reduced total limb stiffness, and (2) reduced magnitude of peak impact forces and increased time delay to peak force. Fourteen subjects with a transtibial amputation participated in this study. Prosthetic stiffness was modified by means of a shock-absorbing pylon that provides reduced longitudinal stiffness through compression of a helical spring within the pylon. A sudden loading evaluation device was built to examine changes in limb loading mechanics during a sudden impact event. No significant change was found in the peak force magnitude or timing of the peak force between prosthetic limb stiffness conditions. Total limb stiffness estimates ranged from 14.9 to 17.9 kN/m but were not significantly different between conditions. Thus, the prosthetic-side total limb stiffness was unaffected by changes in prosthetic limb stiffness. The insensitivity of the total limb stiffness to prosthetic stiffness may be explained by the mechanical characteristics (i.e., stiffness and damping) of the anatomical tissue within the residual limb.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial limbs; elasticity; impact loading; lower-limb; mechanical stress; prosthesis; residual limb; shock; stiffness; transmission; transtibial amputee

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272982      PMCID: PMC5555366          DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  34 in total

1.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet.

Authors:  H W van Jaarsveld; H J Grootenboer; J de Vries; H F Koopman
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Mechanical analysis of the landing phase in heel-toe running.

Authors:  M F Bobbert; M R Yeadon; B M Nigg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation.

Authors:  A E Barr; K L Siegel; J V Danoff; C L McGarvey; A Tomasko; I Sable; S J Stanhope
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-05

5.  Efficacy of shock-absorbing versus rigid pylons for impact reduction in transtibial amputees based on laboratory, field, and outcome metrics.

Authors:  Jocelyn S Berge; Joseph M Czerniecki; Glenn K Klute
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

6.  Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces.

Authors:  D P Ferris; M Louie; C T Farley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dominant role of interface over knee angle for cushioning impact loading and regulating initial leg stiffness.

Authors:  M A Lafortune; E M Hennig; M J Lake
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits.

Authors:  K Postema; H J Hermens; J de Vries; H F Koopman; W H Eisma
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Reflex stiffness of man's anti-gravity muscles during kneebends while carrying extra weights.

Authors:  P R Greene; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Interaction of leg stiffness and surfaces stiffness during human hopping.

Authors:  D P Ferris; C T Farley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.

Authors:  Audra M Davidson; W Lee Childers; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.