Ahva Shahabi1, Juan Pablo Lewinger1, Jie Ren1, Craig April2, Andy E Sherrod3, Joseph G Hacia4, Siamak Daneshmand5, Inderbir Gill5, Jacek K Pinski6, Jian-Bing Fan2,7, Mariana C Stern1,5. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California. 2. Illumina, Inc., San Diego, California. 3. Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California. 5. Department of Urology and USC Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California. 6. Department of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California. 7. AnchorDx Corporation, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current clinical tools have limited accuracy in differentiating patients with localized prostate cancer who are at risk of recurrence from patients with indolent disease. We aimed to identify a gene expression signature that jointly with clinical variables could improve upon the prediction of clinical recurrence after RP for patients with stage T2 PCa. METHODS: The study population includes consented patients who underwent a radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the University of Southern California in the PSA-era (1988-2008). We used a nested case-control study of 187 organ-confined patients (pT2N0M0): 154 with no recurrence ("controls") and 33 with clinical recurrence ("cases"). RNA was obtained from laser capture microdissected malignant glands representative of the overall Gleason score of each patient. Whole genome gene expression profiles (29,000 transcripts) were obtained using the Whole Genome DASL HT platform (Illumina, Inc). A gene expression signature of PCa clinical recurrence was identified using stability selection with elastic net regularized logistic regression. Three existing datasets generated with the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0ST array were used for validation: Mayo Clinic (MC, n = 545), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (SKCC, n = 150), and Erasmus Medical Center (EMC, n = 48). The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were obtained using repeated fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS: A 28-gene expression signature was identified that jointly with key clinical variables (age, Gleason score, pre-operative PSA level, and operation year) was predictive of clinical recurrence (AUC of clinical variables only was 0.67, AUC of clinical variables, and 28-gene signature was 0.99). The AUC of this gene signature fitted in each of the external datasets jointly with clinical variables was 0.75 (0.72-0.77) (MC), 0.90 (0.86-0.94) (MSKCC), and 0.82 (0.74-0.91) (EMC), whereas the AUC for clinical variables only in each dataset was 0.72 (0.70-0.74), 0.86 (0.82-0.91), and 0.76 (0.67-0.85), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report a novel gene-expression based classifier identified using agnostic approaches from whole genome expression profiles that can improve upon the accuracy of clinical indicators to stratify early stage localized patients at risk of clinical recurrence after RP. Prostate 76:1239-1256, 2016.
BACKGROUND: Current clinical tools have limited accuracy in differentiating patients with localized prostate cancer who are at risk of recurrence from patients with indolent disease. We aimed to identify a gene expression signature that jointly with clinical variables could improve upon the prediction of clinical recurrence after RP for patients with stage T2 PCa. METHODS: The study population includes consented patients who underwent a radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the University of Southern California in the PSA-era (1988-2008). We used a nested case-control study of 187 organ-confined patients (pT2N0M0): 154 with no recurrence ("controls") and 33 with clinical recurrence ("cases"). RNA was obtained from laser capture microdissected malignant glands representative of the overall Gleason score of each patient. Whole genome gene expression profiles (29,000 transcripts) were obtained using the Whole Genome DASL HT platform (Illumina, Inc). A gene expression signature of PCa clinical recurrence was identified using stability selection with elastic net regularized logistic regression. Three existing datasets generated with the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0ST array were used for validation: Mayo Clinic (MC, n = 545), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (SKCC, n = 150), and Erasmus Medical Center (EMC, n = 48). The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were obtained using repeated fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS: A 28-gene expression signature was identified that jointly with key clinical variables (age, Gleason score, pre-operative PSA level, and operation year) was predictive of clinical recurrence (AUC of clinical variables only was 0.67, AUC of clinical variables, and 28-gene signature was 0.99). The AUC of this gene signature fitted in each of the external datasets jointly with clinical variables was 0.75 (0.72-0.77) (MC), 0.90 (0.86-0.94) (MSKCC), and 0.82 (0.74-0.91) (EMC), whereas the AUC for clinical variables only in each dataset was 0.72 (0.70-0.74), 0.86 (0.82-0.91), and 0.76 (0.67-0.85), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report a novel gene-expression based classifier identified using agnostic approaches from whole genome expression profiles that can improve upon the accuracy of clinical indicators to stratify early stage localized patients at risk of clinical recurrence after RP. Prostate 76:1239-1256, 2016.
Authors: Dmitri Talantov; Timothy A Jatkoe; Maret Böhm; Yi Zhang; Alison M Ferguson; Phillip D Stricker; Michael W Kattan; Robert L Sutherland; James G Kench; Yixin Wang; Susan M Henshall Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kathryn L Penney; Jennifer A Sinnott; Katja Fall; Yudi Pawitan; Yujin Hoshida; Peter Kraft; Jennifer R Stark; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Sven Perner; Stephen Finn; Stefano Calza; Richard Flavin; Matthew L Freedman; Sunita Setlur; Howard D Sesso; Swen-Olof Andersson; Neil Martin; Philip W Kantoff; Jan-Erik Johansson; Hans-Olov Adami; Mark A Rubin; Massimo Loda; Todd R Golub; Ove Andrén; Meir J Stampfer; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Farhad Kosari; Jan Marie A Munz; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Craig Spiro; Eric W Klee; Dagmar Marie Kube; Lori Tillmans; Jeff Slezak; R Jeffrey Karnes; John C Cheville; George Vasmatzis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joost L Boormans; Hanneke Korsten; Angelique J C Ziel-van der Made; Geert J L H van Leenders; Carola V de Vos; Guido Jenster; Jan Trapman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Tohru Nakagawa; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Bruce W Morlan; S Keith Anderson; Eric J Bergstralh; Brian J Davis; Yan W Asmann; George G Klee; Karla V Ballman; Robert B Jenkins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Valentino; A Calarco; A Di Salle; M Finicelli; S Crispi; R A Calogero; F Riccardo; A Sciarra; A Gentilucci; U Galderisi; S Margarucci; G Peluso Journal: Oncogene Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Elizabeth V Nguyen; Margaret M Centenera; Max Moldovan; Rajdeep Das; Swati Irani; Andrew D Vincent; Howard Chan; Lisa G Horvath; David J Lynn; Roger J Daly; Lisa M Butler Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Ha T N Nguyen; Haoliang Xue; Virginie Firlej; Yann Ponty; Melina Gallopin; Daniel Gautheret Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Min A Jhun; Milan S Geybels; Jonathan L Wright; Suzanne Kolb; Craig April; Marina Bibikova; Elaine A Ostrander; Jian-Bing Fan; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-06-27
Authors: Mitchell G Lawrence; Ruth Pidsley; Birunthi Niranjan; Melissa Papargiris; Brooke A Pereira; Michelle Richards; Linda Teng; Sam Norden; Andrew Ryan; Mark Frydenberg; Clare Stirzaker; Renea A Taylor; Gail P Risbridger; Susan J Clark Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 6.551